Language Minority Students and School Participation: What Kind of English is Needed? *

Abstract

Students who are learning English as a second language are clearly faced with more than learning the grammar of a new language. Yet, very inadequate descriptions of the full range of language skills required in a classroom are the only ones available to date. This paper will report the preliminary results of an ongoing research project being conducted at the University of California, Berkeley. The study has produced some new insights into the specific language skills students need for school by analyzing the comprehension and production of both oral and written language in a classroom. In addition, insights have been gained regarding the proficiency students must achieve in the use of language to be full participants in the classroom. All of this information has contributed to the design of a language test which attempts to assess proficiency in oral and written language use. This innovative design will be described briefly at the end of the paper.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

, & Bruce

Background knowledge and reading readiness comprehension. Urbana, Ill.: Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois, 1980.

Bransford

J.D.

, Barclay

J.R.

, & Franks

J.J.

Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 1972, 3, 193–209.

Bransford

J.D.

, & Johnson

M.K.

Considerations of some problems in comprehension. In Chase

W.G.

(Ed.), Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press, 1973.

Bransford

J.D.

, & McCarrell

N.S.

A sketch of a cognitive approach to comprehension: Some thoughts about understanding what it means to comprehend. In Weimer

W.B.

, & Palermo

D.S.

(Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1974.

Chomsky

Aspects of a theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1980.

Collins

, Brown

J.S.

, & Larkin

K.M.

Inference in text understanding. In Spiro

R.J.

, Bruce

B.C.

, & Brewer

W.F.

(Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1980.

Cummins

Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, Spring 1979, 49(2), 222–251.

Cummins

The construct of language proficiency in bilingual education. In Alatis

J.E.

(Ed.), Current issues in bilingual education (Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1980.

Fillmore

C.J.

Ideal readers and real readers. Paper presented at the 1981 Georgetown Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics, (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, in press.

10.

Halliday

M.A.K.

Learning how to mean. London: Edward Arnold, 1975.

11.

Oller

J.W.

Jr. A language factor deeper than speech: More data and theory for bilingual assessment. In Alatis

J.E.

(Ed.), Current issues in bilingual education (Georgetown Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1980.

12.

Oller

J.W.

Jr. , & Hinofotis

F.B.

Two mutually exclusive hypotheses about second language ability: Indivisible or partially divisible competence? In Oller

J.W.

Jr. , & Perkins

(Eds.), Research in language testing. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House, 1980.

13.

Olson

D.R.

The formalization of linguistic rules. In Macnamara

(Ed.), Language learning and thought. New York: Academic Press, 1977.

14.

Rosenbaum

The development and structure of the Language Skills Framework of the Student Placement System for Bilingual Programs. In Alatis

J.E.

(Ed.), Current issues in bilingual education (Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1980.