Despite a relative lack of attention on the part of both developmental and educational researchers, there are some grounds for believing that Piaget's stage of formal operations is the single stage in his sequence having the most profound and far-reaching implications for education. Following a review of the existing theory and research pertaining to formal operations, some of these potential implications are explored. They arise primarily, it is argued, from indications that the stage of formal operations, unlike the earlier stages in Piaget's sequence, may never be attained by some significant number of individuals. Lastly, some obstacles to fully realizing these implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsC.Inducing formal operational reasoning during old age. Unpublished master's thesis, California State University, Fullerton, 1978.
2.
BynumT., ThomasJ., & WeitzL.Truth-functional logic in formal operational thinking: Inhelder and Piaget's evidence.Developmental Psychology, 1972, 7, 129–132.
3.
CaponN., & KuhnD.Logical reasoning in the supermarket: Adult females' use of a proportional reasoning strategy in an everyday context.Developmental Psychology, 1979, in press.
4.
EnnisR.Children's ability to handle Piaget's propositional logic: A conceptual critique.Review of Educational Research, 1975, 45, 1–41.
5.
FeldmanC., & ToulminS.Logic and the theory of mind. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1975.
6.
HooperF., & SheehanN.Logical concept attainment during the aging years: Issues in the neo-Piagetian research literature. In OvertonW., & GallagherJ. (Eds.), Knowledge and development (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum, 1977.
7.
InhelderB., & PiagetJ.The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence.New York: Basic Books,1958.
8.
KamiiC., & DeVriesR.Piaget for early education. In DayM. C., & ParkerR. (Eds.), The preschool in action (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1978.
9.
KeatingD.Adolescent thinking. In AdelsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of adolescence.New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1979.
10.
KuhnD.Inducing development experimentally: Comments on a research paradigm.Developmental Psychology, 1974, 10, 590–600.
11.
KuhnD.Relation of two Piagetian stage transitions to IQ.Developmental Psychology, 1976, 12, 157–161.
12.
KuhnD., & AngelevJ.An experimental study of the development of formal operational development.Child Development, 1976, 47, 697–706.
13.
KuhnD., & BrannockJ.Development of the isolation of variables scheme in experimental and “natural experiment” contexts.Developmental Psychology, 1977, 13, 9–14.
14.
KuhnD., & HoV.The role of self-directed activity in the development of logical reasoning. Preliminary version to appear in Yearbook of the Jean Piaget Society. New York: Plenum, 1978.
15.
Labouvie-ViefG.Adult cognitive development: In search of alternative interpretations.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 1977, 23, 227–263.
16.
LovellK.A follow-up study of Inhelder and Piaget's “The growth of logical thinking.”British Journal of Psychology, 1961, 52, 143–153.
17.
NeimarkE.Intellectual development during adolescence. In HorowitzF. (Ed.), Review of child development research (Vol. 4). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975.
18.
ParsonsC.Inhelder and Piaget's “The growth of logical thinking,” II: A logician's viewpoint.British Journal of Psychology, 1960, 51, 75–84.
19.
SinnottJ.Everyday thinking and Piagetian operativity in adults.Human Development, 1975, 8, 430–443.
