Mexican-American third and fourth graders (n = 162) were administered a language proficiency test (Moreno Test of Oral Proficiency) and vocabulary test (Peabody Picture Vocabulary) in English and Spanish on two occasions. Males scored significantly higher on Spanish proficiency contrary to general research findings. The sample was further divided into high and low Spanish-ability groups and analyzed with parallel results. However, female scores on Spanish proficiency were even lower for the high group than the low. A cultural inhibition hypothesis was proposed based, in part, on Maccoby's integrative hypothesis to account for these results.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmstrongM. A. S.Children's responses to animal and human figures in Thematic Pictures. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1954, 13, 67–70.
2.
BayleyN.Data on the growth of intelligence between 16 and 21 years as measured by the Wechsler-Bellevue Scale. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1957, 90, 3–15.
3.
BereiterC.Verbal and ideational fluency in superior tenth grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1960, 51, 337–345.
4.
BoneauC. A.The effect of violations of assumptions underlying the t test. Psychological Bulletin, 1960, 57, 49–64.
5.
DarleyF. L.Comparison of male and female kindergarten children on the WISC. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1961, 99, 41–49.
6.
Diaz-GuerreroR., & PeckR. F.Estilo de confrontación y aprovechamiento: Un programa de investigación. Revista Interamerican de Psicologia, 1967, 1, 127–136.
ErvinS. M.Learning and recall in bilinguals. American Journal of Psychology, 1961, 74, 446–451.
9.
GanslI.Vocabulary: Its measurement and growth. Archives of Psychology, 1939, No. 236.
10.
GaraiJosef E., & ScheinfeldAmramSex differences in mental and behavioral traits. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 1968, 77, 169–299.
11.
HavighurstR. J., & BreeseF. F.Relation between ability and social status in a midwestern community: III. Primary mental abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1947, 38, 241–247.
12.
HerefordC. F., SelzN., StenningW., & NatalicioL.A cross-cultural comparison of the active-passive dimension of social attitudes. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 1967, 1, 33–39.
13.
HollingheadA. B.Two-factor index of social position. Unpublished manuscript, 1957. (Available from August B. Hollingshead, 1965 Yale Station, New Haven, Connecticut.)
14.
LevinsonB. M.Comparative study of verbal and performance ability of monolingual and bilingual native-born Jewish children of traditional parentage. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1960, 97, 93–112.
15.
McCarthyD.Language development in children. In CarmichaelL. (Ed.), Manual of Child Psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1954.
16.
MaccobyE. E. (Ed.). The Development of Sex Differences.Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1966.
17.
MoriartyA.Coping patterns of preschool children in response to intelligence test demands. Genetic Psychological Monographs, 1961, 64, 3–127.
18.
PavlosA. J.Sex differences among rural Negro children on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Proceedings of the West Virginia Academy of Sciences, 1961, 55, 109–114.
19.
SarasonI. G.Test anxiety and intellectual performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963, 66, 73–75.
20.
ShawD. J.Sexual bias in the WAIS. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1965, 29, 590–591.
21.
TemplinM. C.Certain language skills in children. Institute of Child Welfare Monograph, No. 26, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1967.
22.
TylerL. (Ed.). The Psychology of Human Differences (3rd ed.) New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.
23.
WallachM. A., & CaronA. J.Attribute criteriality and sex-linked conservatism as determinants of psychological similarity. Journal of Abnormal it Social Psychology, 1959, 59, 43–50.
24.
WechslerD.Sex differences in intelligence. The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence (4th ed.). Baltimore, Md.: Williams & Wilkins, 1958. Pp. 144–151.
25.
YongeG. D.Sex differences in cognitive functioning as a result of experimentally induced frustration. Journal of Experimental Education, 1964, 32, 275–280.
