AhrensA.Untersuchungen uber die Bewegung der Augen beim Schreiben, Rostock, 1891.
2.
AndersonIrving and WalterF. DearbornThe Psychology of Teaching Reading.New York: The Ronald Press Company, 1952.
3.
BallantineF. A. “Age Changes in Measures of Eye Movements in Silent Reading.” Studies in the psychology of reading. Monographs in Education, No. 4.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1931.
4.
BentleyM. “Leading and Legibility,” Psychological Monographs, 1921.
5.
BurtSir CyrilA Psychological Study of Typography.Cambridge: University Press, 1959.
6.
BuswellGuy Thomas “An Experimental Study of the Eye-Voice Span in Reading,” Supplementary Educational Monographs, No. 17. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1930.
7.
BuswellGuy Thomas “Fundamental Reading Habits: A Study of Their Development,” Supplementary Educational Monographs, No. 45, 1937.
8.
CroslandH. R. and Georgia Johnson “The Range of Apprehension as Affected by Inter-letter Hair Spacing and by the Characteristics of Individual Letters,” Journal of Psychology, VIII, 1897, 315–93.
9.
DavidsonH. P. “An Experimental Study of the Bright, Average and Dull Children at the Four Year Mental Level,” Genetic Psychological Monographs, 1941, 9:3–4.
10.
DearbornW. F.The Psychology of Reading.Archives of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, 1906.
11.
DelabarreE. B. “A Method of Recording Eye-Movements in Reading,” American Journal of Psychology, 1901, 9:572–74.
12.
DodgeR. and ClineT. S. “The Angle Velocity of Eye Movements,” Psychological Review, 1901, 8:145–157.
13.
ErdmanB. and DodgeR.Psychologische Untersuchungen uber das Lesen auf experimenteller Grundlage.Niemeyer, 1898.
GillilandA. R. “The Effect on Reading of Changes in the Size of Type,” Elementary School Journal, 1933. 24:138–146.
16.
GoldscheiderAlfred and Robert Muller “Zur Physiologie und Pathologie des Lesens,” Zeitschrift fur klinische Medicin, XXIII, 1893, 131–67.
17.
HueyE. B. “On the Psychology and Physiology of Reading. I,” American Journal of Psychology, 1900, 11:283–302.
18.
JuddC. H. and McAllisterC. N. “General Introduction to a Series of Studies of Eye Movements by Means of Kinetoscopic Photographs,” Psychological Monographs, 1905, 7:1–16.
19.
KurtzJ. I. “General and Ocular Fatigue Problems,” American Journal of Optometry, 1377, 14, part I, 273–280, part II, 308–317.
20.
LeeMarshallBookmaking: The Illustrated Guide to Design and Production.New York: R. R. Banker Company, 1965.
21.
LuckieshM. and MossF. K. “The Effect of Line Length on Readability,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 1948, 25:67–75.
22.
LuckieshM. and MossF. K.The Science of Seeing.New York: Van Nostrand, 1937.
23.
LuckieshM. and MossF. K. “The Visibility of Print in Various Qualities of Paper,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 1941, 25:152–58.
24.
McNamaraW. G., PatersonD. G. and TinkerM. A. “The Influence of Size of Type on Speed of Reading in the Primary Grades.” Sight Saving Review, 1953, 23:28–33.
25.
MilesW. R. “The Peep-hole Method for Observing Eye Movements in Reading,” Journal of General Psychology, 1908, 1:373–74.
26.
PatersonD. G. and TinkerM. A.How To Make Type Readable.New York: Harper, 1940.
27.
PatersonD. B. and TinkerM. A. “Influences of Line Width on Eye Movements.” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1940, 27:572–577.
28.
PillsburyWalter Bowers “The Reading of Words: A Study in Apperception,” American Journal of Psychology, VIII, 1897, 315–93.
29.
PykeR. L. “Report on the Legibility of Print,” London: His Majesty's Stationery Office, 1936.
30.
Quantz. “Problems in the Psychology of Reading,” Psychological Review Monograph Supplements. II. December, 1897, 1–51.
31.
SpaethR. A. “The Problem of Fatigue,” Journal of Industrial Hygiene, 1919–20, I, 22–53.
32.
StantonF. N. and BurttH. E. “The Influence of Surface and tint of Paper in the Speed of Reading,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 1945, 19, 43–52.
33.
StarchD.Principles of Advertising.Chicago: A. W. Shaw Company, 1943.
34.
TinkerMiles A.Bases for Effective Reading.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1965.
35.
TinkerMiles “Legibility of Print for Children in the Upper Grades,” American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry, 1963, 40:614–621.
36.
TinkerM. A. and PatersonD. G. “Reader Preferences and Typography,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 1952, 26:38–40.
37.
WebsterH. A. and TinkerM. A. “The Influence of Paper Surface on the Perceptibility of Print,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 1945, 19:683–693.
38.
WebsterH. A. and TinkerM. A. “Fatigue and What to Do about it.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 1952, 44:67–79.
39.
WilkinsMinna Cheves “A Tachistoscopic Experiment in Reading.” Unpublished Master's thesis, Columbia University, 1917.
40.
WoodworthR. S.Experimental Psychology, New York: Holt, 1938.
41.
ZachrissonB. “Some Experiments With Children Regarding the Readability of Printed Text,” Research Bulletin No. 9, Stockholm: The Institute of Education, University of Stockholm, 1956.