HilgardErnest R.Theories of Learning, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc. 2 ed.; 1956, p. 17.
2.
HilgardErnest R. (ed.). Theories of Learning and Instruction, The Sixty-third Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1963, p. 11.
3.
Theories of Learning and Instruction, p. 217.
4.
Theories of Learning and Instruction, p. 220.
5.
BurnsHobart W. (ed.). Sociological Backgrounds of Adult Education, Chicago: Center for the Study of Liberal Education of Adults, 1964, p. 110.
6.
MillerHarry L.Teaching and Learning in Adult Education, New York: The Macmillan Co., 1964, pp. 9–11.
7.
KuhlenRaymond G, (ed.). Psychological Backgrounds of Adult Education, Chicago: Center for the Study of Liberal Education of Adults, 1962, pp. 43–77.
8.
Burns, op. cit., p. 25.
9.
op. cit., pp. 8–42.
10.
SolomonDaniel (ed.). The Continuing Learner, Chicago: Center for the Study of Liberal Education of Adults, 1961, pp. 25f.
11.
The Continuing Learner, pp. 2f.
12.
Hilgard, loc. cit., p. 220.
13.
For further analysis of the Lewinian model see: BennisWarren, BenneKenneth, and ChinRobert. The Planning of Change, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1962, pp. 235–49.
14.
BennisWarren, Interpersonal Dynamics, Homewood, Illinois: The Dorsey Press, 1964.
15.
BradfordLeland P., GibbJack R., and BenneKenneth D.T-Group Theory and Laboratory Method, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.1964, p. 2.
16.
For presentation of different trainor roles see Bradford, Gibb and Benne, T-Group Theory and Laboratory Method
17.
ArgyrisChris“T-Groups for Organizational Effectiveness,”Harvard Business Review, Vol. XLII, March-April 1964, pp. 60–74.
18.
BlakeRobert R., “Breakthrough in Organization Development,”Harvard Business Review, Vol. XLII, Nov.-Dec., 1964, pp. 133–55.
