Abstract

Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ethel Gardner
, Minority Report on Platoon Schools, submitted to the Board of School Directors of Milwaukee , May 6, 1924
2.
Gilmore
, “The Platoon School as it Functions Academically.” Pennsylvania School Journal, April, 1921 ,—451.
3.
Johnson
, “Some Statistics on the Platoon School.” Chicago School Journal, January, 1926 .
4.
Kirby
, “The Platoon School.” Educator-Journal, 23: 216 –218 . February, 1923 .
5.
Overturf
, “The Companion Class Plan in Sacramento.” Journal of Education, September 3, 1925 .
6.
Palmer
, “Advantages of the Platoon School.” Popular Education, 29: 548 –550 . June, 1922 .
7.
Rossman
, “Comparative Costs,” American School Board Journal, June, 1924 , 53 –54 .
8.School Board, Newark, New Jersey , “Some Features of the Gary and Detroit School Systems.” In Newark School Bulletin, Vol. 2 , No. 7 , March, 1922 , 122 .
9.
Spain
, “The Platoon School.”
10.Superintendent, Passaic, New Jersey, School Program. Blue Print.
11.Superintendent, Passaic, New Jersey, School Program. No. 12 School.
12.United States Bureau of Education. “How the Work-Study-Play Plan Would Relieve Congestion, Etc.” Bulletin 1920 , No. 27.
