This study explores the perspectives of middle school educators and parents in a region with high dropout rates regarding school engagement and social-emotional learning (SEL) competencies. Using a phenomenological approach, data were collected from 16 teachers and 15 parents across three schools through six focus group discussions. Participants reported that low student awareness, lack of interest in lessons, and reluctance to attend school undermined engagement. In the academic context, they emphasized the importance of recognizing students’ achievements and expanding teachers’ authority to enhance engagement. Socially, strengthening teacher–student relationships, providing parent training, and fostering positive parental involvement were seen as critical. Notably, participants perceived that barriers to school engagement and challenges in SEL development—considered essential for fostering engagement—overlapped. Participants emphasized the need for initiatives that promote SEL skills, enhance engagement, and reduce dropout rates. They highlighted the importance of creating multifaceted learning environments that support SEL areas and involving a broader range of stakeholders in this process.
AppletonJ. J.ChristensonS. L.KimD.ReschlyA. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
2.
ArchambaultI.JanoszM.OlivierE.DupéréV. (2022). Student engagement and school dropout: Theories, evidence, and future directions. In In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 331–355): Springer International Publishing.
3.
AstinA. W. (2014). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. In In College student development and academic life (pp. 251–262). Routledge.
4.
AtılganH. (2018). Transition among education levels in Turkey: Past-present and a recommended model. Ege Journal of Education, 19(1), 1–18.
5.
AygünH. E. (2017). The effect of social emotional learning program on development of social emotional learning skills, academic achievement and classroom environment. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University.
6.
BalkısM. (2018). Academic amotivation and intention to school dropout: The mediation role of academic achievement and absenteeism. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 38(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2018.1460258
CefaiC.DownesP.CavioniV. (2021). A formative, inclusive, whole school approach the assessment of social and emotional education in the EU. NESET report. Publications Office of the European Union.
9.
CoelhoV. A.MarchanteM.BrásP. (2023). Positive attitude upper middle school social and emotional learning program: Influences of implementation quality on program outcome. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1172517. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1172517
10.
Collaborative for Academic SocialEmotional Learning(CASEL). (2021). Sel: What are the core competence areas and where are they promoted. https://casel.org/cdi-tenyear-report/
11.
CreswellJ. W. (2015). 30 essential skills for the qualitative researcher. Sage Publications.
12.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
13.
DemetriouA.KaziS.MakrisN.SpanoudisG. (2020). Cognitive ability, cognitive self-awareness, and school performance: From childhood to adolescence. Intelligence (Norwood), 79, Article 101432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101432
14.
DivechaD.BrackettM. (2020). Rethinking school-based bullying prevention through the lens of social and emotional learning: A bioecological perspective. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 2(2), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42380-019-00019-5
15.
DoğanS.OktayY. (2022). Evaluation of high school entrance exam (HSEE) preparation process. İnsan Ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(2), 963–992. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1054829
16.
DottererA. M.WehrspannE. (2016). Parent involvement and academic outcomes among urban adolescents: Examining the role of school engagement. Educational Psychology, 36(4), 812–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1099617
17.
DuckworthA. L.TaxerJ. L.Eskreis-WinklerL.GallaB. M.GrossJ. J. (2019). Self control and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 373–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103230
18.
DupéréV.LeventhalT.DionE.CrosnoeR.ArchambaultI.JanoszM. (2015). Stressors and turning points in high school and dropout: A stress process, life course framework. Review of educational research, 85(4), 591–629. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314559845
19.
DurlakJ. A.DomitrovichC. E.WeissbergR. P.GullottaT. P. (Eds.), (2015). Handbook for social and emotional learning: Research and practice. Guilford Press.
20.
EranılA. K. (2024). School dropout causes in Turkish education system (2009-2022): A pareto analysis by grade level. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 17(2), 451–477. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1291174
ErgünN. S.SarıcaZ. B.AltınsoyE.TanrısevdiF. (2021). Examining levels of 12th grade students’ professional maturity and audit focus according to school types. Bilim Armonisi, 4(2), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.37215/bilar.861602
23.
EroğluY.DemiralpC.GözcüA. C. (2023). A Field study on future choises of students in vocatıonal hıgh schools: The case of Hakkari. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(4), 2234–2253. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.20231353793
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
26.
FredricksJ. A.ParrA. K.AmemiyaJ. L.WangM. T.BrauerS. (2019). What matters for urban adolescents’ engagement and disengagement in school: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 34(5), 491–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558419830638
27.
FrydenbergE.MartinA. J.CollieR. J. (2017). Social and emotional learning in Australia and the Asia-Pacific. In: Social and emotional learning in the Australasian context. Springer.
GreenbergM. T.DomitrovichC. E.WeissbergR. P.DurlakJ. A. (2017). Social and emotional learning as a public health approach to education. The Future of Children, 27(1), 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2017.0001
30.
GubbelsJ.van der PutC. E.AssinkM. (2019). Risk factors for school absenteeism and dropout: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(9), 1637–1667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01072-5
31.
HermanK. C.PrewettS. L.EddyC. L.SavalaA.ReinkeW. M. (2020). Profiles of middle school teacher stress and coping: Concurrent and prospective correlates. Journal of School Psychology, 78, 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.11.003
32.
JiangS.RenQ.JiangC.WangL. (2021). Academic stress and depression of Chinese adolescents in junior high schools: Moderated mediation model of school burnout and self-esteem. Journal of Affective Disorders, 295, 384–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.085
33.
JimersonS. R.CamposE.GreifJ. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. California School Psychologist, 8(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03340893
34.
KılıçH. (2024). Changes in society’s view of teachers and schools; Findings and solution suggestions. Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi, (61), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.17498/kdeniz.1413010
35.
KıroğlanN.BekmezE.KaraY.ÇanS.Demirİ.BıçakcıA. U. (2024). Parental attitudes from a conceptual perspective. Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 10(37), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10498083
KorkmazU.AygülH. H. (2018). The impact of the cultural differences in the interaction between teachers and students on the generation of inequalities in success: The example of Hakkari / Yüksekova. Journal of History School (JOHS), 35, 807–840.
38.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
39.
LowS.SmolkowskiK.CookC. (2016). What constitutes high-quality implementation of SEL programs? A latent class analysis of second step implementation. Prevention Science: The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 17(8), 981–991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0670-3
40.
ManzuoliC. H.Pineda-BáezC.SánchezA. D. V. (2019). School engagement for avoiding dropout in middle school education. International Education Studies, 12(5), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n5p35
41.
MinneyD.GarciaJ.AltobelliJ.Perez-BrenaN.BlunkE. (2019). Social-emotional learning and evaluation in after-school care: A working model. Journal of Youth Development, 14(3), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2019.660
42.
Miranda-ZapataE.LaraL.NavarroJ. J.SaracosttiM.de-ToroX. (2018). Modelling the effect of school engagement on attendance to classes and school performance. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 23(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2018.03.001
43.
OECD. (2022). Education at a glance 2022: OECD ındicators. OECD.
44.
OrpinasP.RaczynskiK.PetersJ. W.ColmanL.BandalosD. (2015). Latent profile analysis of sixth graders based on teacher ratings: Association with school dropout. School Psychology Quarterly: The Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology, American Psychological Association, 30(4), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000107
45.
ÖzbayA.KahramanS.Deniz ÖzdemirH.GüreG. (2023). Locus of control and parent-child communication: The mediating role of general self-efficacy. Cyprus Turkish Journal of Psychiatry & Psychology (CTJPP), 5(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.35365/ctjpp.23.2.03
46.
ÖzdemirM. Ç.IşıkV. (2023). Can future jobs and next-generation skills be a solution for youth unemployment in an underdeveloped region: The case of TRB2 region. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(2), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.36483/vanvetj.1164939
47.
ÖzdemirY. (2015). School burnout in secondary school students: Role of homework, school engagement and academic motivation. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 27–35. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/articlefile/399538
48.
PamukE.KirazZ. (2016). Problems encountered by school administrators in elective course implementations in secondary schools. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(3), 977–1003. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/articlefile/229554
49.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
50.
PereiraN. S.Marques-PintoA. (2017). The role of participant responsiveness on a socio emotional learning program. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20, Article E2. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2016.104
51.
PraveenaK. R.SasikumarS. (2021). Application of Colaizzi’s method of data analysis in phenomenological research. Medico-Legal Update, 21(2), 914–918. https://doi.org/10.37506/mlu.v21i2.2800
ReschlyA. L.ChristensonS. L. (2022). Jingle-jangle revisited: History and further evolution of the student engagement construct. In ReschlyA. L.ChristensonS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–24). Springer.
55.
SadıkoğluB.DoğanM. (2020). Development of educatıonal functıon from republıc to the present ın Hakkari provınce. Journal of Awareness, 5(3), 449. https://doi.org/10.26809/joa.5.032
56.
SamaraM.Da Silva NascimentoB.El-AsamA.HammudaS.KhattabN. (2021). How can bullying victimisation lead to lower academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the mediating role of cognitive-motivational factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(5), 2209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18052209
57.
Schonert-ReichlK. A. (2017). Social and emotional learning and teachers. The Future of Children, 27(1), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2017.0007
58.
SheltonT.BenatowiczC.HealyP.RyanN. D.CameronJ. L. (2023). Development and testing of a curriculum to improve decision‐making skills in middle and high school students. Mind, Brain, and Education, 17(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12339
59.
TaylorR. D.OberleE.DurlakJ. A.WeissbergR. P. (2017). Promoting positive youth development through school‐based social and emotional learning interventions: A meta‐analysis of follow‐up effects. Child Development, 88(4), 1156–1171. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12864
60.
TikkanenL.AnttilaH.PyhältöK.SoiniT.PietarinenJ. (2022). The role of empathy between peers in upper secondary students’ study engagement and burnout. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 978546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.978546
UlusoyB. (2020). An ınvestigation of 8th grade student’s perceptions of high school entrance exam through metaphors. Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Eregli Egitim Fakultesi, Necmettin Erbakan University, 2(2), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.51119/ereegf.2020.5
63.
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education – a tool on whose terms: UNESCO.
64.
UNESCO. (2024). Global education monitoring report, 2024/5, leadership in education: Lead for learning: UNESCO.
WangM. T.HofkensT. L. (2020). Beyond classroom academics: A school-wide and multi contextual perspective on student engagement in school. Adolescent Research Review, 5(4), 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-019-00115-z
67.
WangM. T.KiuruN.DegolJ. L.Salmela-AroK. (2018). Friends, academic achievement and school engagement during adolescence: A social network approach to peer influence and selection effects. Learning and Instruction, 58, 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.06.003
68.
YangC.BearG. G.MayH. (2018). Multilevel associations between school-wide social emotional learning approach and student engagement across elementary, middle, and high schools. School Psychology Review, 47(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-2017-0003.v47-1
69.
YılmazF.ŞekerciH. (2016). The issue of mother tongue: Problems of students based on the experience of primary school teachers. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education – JOQRE, 4(1), 47-63. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.4c1s3m
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
