Collaboration between professionals allows for optimal student outcomes in the school setting. A shift in the educational system, including the reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) in 2004, the use of Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) and changes in curriculum standards have increased the need and expectation for school-based speech-language providers to engage in collaborative practices. The aim of this study was to identify practices used in speech-language providers in public schools to collaborate and barriers to collaboration. To address this question, speech-language providers working in public schools (n = 151) were surveyed. Data was analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. Most collaborated regularly with special education teachers, occupational therapists (OTs), and school psychologists. Lack of time was reported to be a major barrier to more significant collaboration. Few providers reported having shared planning time with special education teachers. Clinical practices, implications, and real-world solutions are discussed.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2016). Scope of practice in speech language pathology. [Professional Issues Statement]. https://www.asha.org/policy/sp2016-00343/
American Speech-Language Hearing Association (n.d.a). Interprofessional education/interprofessional practice (IPE/IPP). https://www.asha.org/practice/ipe-ipp/
AmirR.JonesS. E.FrankelD.FritzschJ. (2021). Job satisfaction of school-based speech language pathologists in New York state as a function of workplace features. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 6(2), 470–484. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_PERSP-20-00196
10.
BakerE.McLeodS. (2011). Evidence-based practice for children with speech sound disorders: Part 1 narrative review. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 42(2), 102–139. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2010/09-0075)
11.
BelliniS.PetersJ. K.BennerL.HopfA. (2007). A metaanalysis of school-based social skills interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 28(3), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280030401
BrimoD.HuffmanH. E. (2023). A survey of speech-language pathologists’ and teachers’ perception of collaborative service delivery. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 54(3), 873–887. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_LSHSS-22-00107
14.
BruceL.LyndeS.WeinholdJ.PeterB. (2018). A team approach to response to intervention for speech sound errors in the school setting. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 3(16), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1044/persp3.SIG16.110
15.
CaswellT.Dickson-ProkopchakJ.NataliC. (2024). A shared adaptive storybook reading collaborative with SLPs and preschool teachers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 53(3), 741–757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-023-01619-z
16.
DeLucaT.KomesidouR.PelletierR.HoganT. (2023). What works in collaboration? Identifying key ingredients to improve service delivery in schools. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 54(4), 1103–1116. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_LSHSS-22-00180
FarquharsonK.CabbageK. L.ReedA. C.MoodyM. A. (2023). Subtract before you add: Toward the development of a de-implementation approach in school-based speech sound therapy. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 54(4), 1052–1065. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_LSHSS-22-00176
IrelandM.ConradB. J. (2016). Evaluation and eligibility for speech-language services in schools. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 1(16), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1044/persp1.SIG16.78
KatzL. A.MaagA.FallonK. A.BlenkarnK.SmithM. K. (2010). What makes a caseload (un) manageable? School-Based speech-language pathologists speak. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 41(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0090)
28.
KleeckA. V. (2008). Providing preschool foundations for later reading comprehension: The importance of and ideas for targeting inferencing in storybook‐sharing interventions. Psychology in the Schools, 45(7), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20314
29.
LancasterG.KeuschS.LevinA.PringT.MartinS. (2010). Treating children with phonological problems: Does an eclectic approach to therapy work?International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 45(2), 174–181. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682820902818888
30.
MitchellM. P.EhrenB. J.TowsonJ. A. (2020). Collaboration in schools: Let’s define it. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 5(3), 732–751. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_PERSP-19-00125
31.
MitchellM. P.EhrenB. J.TowsonJ. A. (2022). Vocabulary outcomes with third graders in a teacher and speech-language pathologist collaboration. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 7(6), 2067–2087. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_PERSP-22-00008
32.
MountM. (2014). Facilitating cohesive service delivery through collaboration. Perspectives on School-Based Issues, 15(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1044/sbi15.1.15
33.
National Center for Interprofessional Practice and Collaboration. (n.d.). About interprofessional practice and collaboration. https://nexusipe.org/informing/about-ipe
OcampoA.KennedyK. (2019). The relationship of collaboration and job satisfaction between speech-language pathologists and school psychologists. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 4(1), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1044/PERS-SIG16-2018-0003
39.
PetersonP. (2009). Promoting generalization and maintenance of skills learned via natural language teaching. Journal of Speech - Language Pathology and Applied Behavior Analysis, 4(1), 90–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100252
40.
PfeifferD. L.PavelkoS. L.Hahs-VaughnD. L.DuddingC. C. (2019). A National survey of speech-language pathologists’ engagement in interprofessional collaborative practice in schools: Identifying predictive factors and barriers to implementation. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50(4), 639–655. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS-18-0100
41.
PlumbA. M.PlexicoL. W. (2013). Autism spectrum disorders: Experience, training, and confidence levels of school-based speech-language pathologists. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 44(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2012/11-0105)
RusselS. C.KaderavekJ. N. (1993). Alternative models for collaborations. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in. Schools, 24(2), 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.2402.76
SteeleS. C. (2019). Vocabulary intervention: A national survey of school-based speech-language pathologists. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 41(3), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740119827008
46.
Sum ToC. K.McLeodS.SamS. L.LawT. (2022). Predicting which children will normalize without intervention for speech sound disorders. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65(5), 1724–1741. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00444
WeadmanT.SerryT.SnowP. (2022). Oral language and emergent literacy strategies used by Australian early childhood teachers during shared book reading. Early Childhood Education Journal, 51(8), 1335–1348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-022-01381-8
50.
WilcoxM. J.KouriT. A.CaswellS. B. (1991). Early language intervention: A comparison of classroom and individual treatment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360.0101.49
51.
WilliamsonP.HoppeyD.McLeskeyJ.BergmannE.MooreH. (2020). Trends in LRE placement rates over the past 25 years. The Journal of Special Education, 53(4), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919855052
52.
WuM. J.ZK.Fils-AimeF. (2022). Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100206
