Early diagnosis of children with reading disorders is essential for intervention and academic success. Many children with reading difficulties have a deficit in phonemic awareness. A web-based, group-administered screening vehicle, the Risk Factor Screen for Reading (RiFS-Reading), was developed to quickly identify students who are “At Risk” for reading difficulties by assessing knowledge of phonemic awareness. The goal was to establish the validity of the RiFS-Reading measure. Results supported construct validity through factor analysis and criterion validity by comparisons with performance on well-established measures of phonemic awareness and reading. Phonemic awareness on the RiFS-Reading was independent of other language skills.
BaldickC. (1990). The concise oxford dictionary of literary terms. Oxford University Press.
2.
BoatengG. O.NeilandsT. B.FrongilloE. A.Melgar-QuiñonezH. R.YoungS. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6(149), 149–218. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
3.
BreauxK. C. (2020). WIAT 4: Wechsler Individual Achievement Test: Manual. - Gordon College. Pearson Education, Inc.
CattsH. W.GillispieM.LeonardL. B.KailR. V.MillerC. A. (2002). The role of speed of processing, rapid naming, and phonological awareness in reading achievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(6), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194020350060301
6.
Curriculum Associates. (2019). i-Ready efficacy: Research on i-Ready instruction program impact. (Curriculum Associates research report No. RR 2019-55). North Billerica, MA: Author.
7.
DavidC.AdrianR.MoldovanuA. E. (2022). The factorial structure of the phonological awareness construct. A qualitative review. Education, Reflection, Development - ERD2021, vol. 2. European Proceedings of Educational Sciences (pp. 23–40).
8.
DomingueB. W.DellM.LangD.SilvermanR.YeatmanJ.HoughH. (2022). The effect of COVID on oral reading fluency during the 2020–2021 academic year. AERA Open, 8(1), 233285842211202. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221120254
9.
EhriL. C.NunesS. R.StahlS. A.WillowsD. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National reading panel's meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393–447. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543071003393
10.
FrancisD. J.ShaywitzS. E.StuebingK. K.ShaywitzB. A.FletcherJ. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.3
GoodR. H.GrubaG. G.KaminskiR. A. (2001). Best practices in using dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (DIBELS). In ThomasA.GrimesJ. (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 679–700). National Association of School Psychologists.
13.
HamiltonS. S.,GlascoeF. P. (2006). Evaluation of children with reading difficulties. American Family Physician, 74(12), 2079–2084.
14.
HernandezD. J. (2011). Double Jeopardy: How third-grade reading skills and Poverty Influence high school Graduation. Annie E. Casey Foundation. https://www.aecf.org
15.
HøienT.LundbergI.StanovichK. E.BjaalidI. K. (1995). Components of phonological awareness. Reading and Writing, 7(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01027184
16.
KilpatrickD. (2016). Equipped for reading success: A comprehensive guide step-by-step program for developing phoneme awareness and fluent word recognition. Casey & Kirsch.
17.
LyonG. (1998, March). Why reading is not a natural process. Educational Leadership, 55(6), 14–18.
MilankovV.GolubovićS.KrstićT.GolubovićŠ. (2021). Phonological awareness as the foundation of reading acquisition in students reading in transparent orthography. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10), 5440. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105440
20.
Northwest Evaluation Association. (2016). Linking the Kentucky K-PREP assessments to NWEA MAP tests. Northwest Evaluation Association. https://www.nwea.org/about/
21.
SchrankF. A.MatherN.McGrewK. S. (2014). Woodcock-johnson IV: Tests of Achievement. Riverside Publishing Company.
22.
SiegelmanN.RuecklJ. G.van den BuntM.FrijtersJ. C.ZevinJ. D.LovettM. W.SeidenbergM. S.PughK. R.MorrisR. D. (2022). How you read affects what you gain: Individual differences in the functional organization of the reading system predict intervention gains in children with reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(4), 855–869. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000672
23.
TorgesenJ. K. (1999). Assessment and instruction for phonemic awareness and word reading skills. In CattsH. W.KamhiA. G. (Eds.), Language Basis of reading disabilities. Allyn & Bacon.
24.
TorgesenJ. K.WagnerR. K.RashotteC. A.HerronJ.LindamoodP. (2010). Computer-assisted instruction to prevent early reading difficulties in students at risk for dyslexia: Outcomes from two instructional approaches. Annals of Dyslexia, 60(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-009-0032-y
25.
WagnerR. K.,TorgesenJ. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 192–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192
26.
WagnerR. K.TorgesenJ. K.RashotteC. A.PearsonN. A. (2013). Comprehensive test of phonological processing–2nd ed. (CTOPP-2). Pro-Ed.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
