Increasingly, national standards require K-12 students to develop digital literacy practices. In literacy, teachers’ use of digital media platforms has unrecognized potential to impact students’ literacy engagement. Moreover, students gain English Language Arts skills and knowledge of the writing process when completing digital literacy storytelling projects. This study records the preparedness and willingness of participants in a graduate-level teaching English Language Arts to implement digital literacy storytelling projects in K-12 settings. Results indicate that some participants unlocked the possibilities of using the Digital Literacy. Storytelling Project as a learning tool for English Language Arts, while others remained blocked to the potential for the Digital Literacy Storytelling Project due to their challenges with technology. The study highlights the implications of supporting the digital development of K-12 teachers.
AndersonK. M.,MackR. (2019). Digital storytelling: A narrative method for positive identity development in minority youth. Social Work with Groups, 42(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/01609513.2017.1413616
BarrettH (2006). Researching and evaluating digital storytelling as a deep learning tool. n C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.). In Proceedings of SITE 2006--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 647–654). Orlando, FL: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Technology and Teacher Education. Technology and Teacher Education Annual. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22117/
4.
BloomB. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, handbook: The cognitive domain. David McKay.
5.
BradleyB. A.,ReinkingD. (2011). Revisiting the connection between research and practice using design research and formative experiments. In: DukeN.MalletteM. (eds) Literacy research methodologies (2nd ed.), (pp. 188–212). Guilford Press.
6.
BrodC. (1984). Technostress: The human cost of the computer revolution. Addison-Wesley.
7.
BrownJ. S.DenningS.GrohK.PrusakL. (2004). Storytelling in organizations: Why storytelling is transforming 21st-century organizations and management. Butterworth-Heinemann.
8.
Brushwood RoseC.,GrangerC. A. (2013). Unexpected self-expression and the limits of narrative inquiry: Exploring unconscious dynamics in a community-based digital storytelling workshop. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(2), 216–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2012.666286
BurnettC. (2011). Pre-service teachers’ digital literacy practices: Exploring contingency in identity and digital literacy in and out of educational contexts. Language and Education, 25(5), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.584347
ChaiC. S.KohJ. H. L.TsaiC. C. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology and Society, 13(4), 63–73.
13.
ChanB. S. K.ChurchillD.ChiuT. K. F. (2017). Digital literacy learning in higher education through digital storytelling approach. Journal of International Education Research, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v13i1.9907
14.
ConleyM. W.FriedhoffJ. R.GritterK.DuinenD. V. (2008). Strategies that improve adolescents’ performance with content-area texts. In ConleyM. (Ed) Adolescent literacy policy and instruction: The research we have and the research we need (pp. 88–104). Guilford Press.
15.
CreswellJ. W. (1999). Mixed method research: Introduction and application. In CijekT. (Ed.), 472) (p. 455). San Deigo, CA: Academic Press.
16.
EarlyJ.,HernandezA. (2021). Digital disenfranchisement and COVID-19: Broadband internet access as a social determinant of health. Health Promotion Practice, 22(5)–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399211014490
ErikssonJ.,GiacomelloG. (2013). Content analysis in the digital age: Tools, functions, and implications for security. In KrügerJ.NickolayB.GayckenS. (Eds) The secure information society. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4763-3_6
19.
FantozziV.JohnsonC.ScherfenA. (2018). Technology and play: An important intersection for 21st century literacies. Young Children, 73(2), 88–93.
20.
Fernández-BataneroJ. M.Román-GravánP.Reyes-RebolloM. M.Montenegro-RuedaM. (2021). Impact of educational technology on teacher stress and anxiety: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(2), 548. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020548
21.
GayG. (2018). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (3rd ed.). Teachers College Press.
GirmenP.ÖzkanalÜ.DayanG. (2019). Digital storytelling in the Language Arts classroom. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070108
24.
GlaserB. G.,StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
25.
GlassG. V.,StanleyJ. C. (1970). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Prentice-Hall.
26.
GreenhowC. M. (2011). Research methods unique to digital contexts: An introduction to virtual ethnography. In DukeN.MalletteM. (Eds) Literacy research methodologies (2nd ed.) (pp. 70–87). Guilford Press.
HammondZ. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among the culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin/Sage Publications.
29.
HerringtonJ.ReevesT. C.OliverR. (2014). Authentic learning environments. In SpectorJ. M.MerrillM. D.EllenJ.BishopM. J. (eds) Handbook of research on educational communication and technology (pp 401–412). Springer.
30.
KoehlerM. J.MishraP.KereluikK.ShinT. S.GrahamC. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In SpectorJ. M. (eds) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
31.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). But that’s just good teaching! The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159–165, https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849509543675
LisenbeeP. S.,FordC. M. (2018). Engaging students in traditional and digital storytelling to make connections between pedagogy and children’s experiences. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0846-x
34.
Lohnes WatulakS. (2018). Making space for preservice teacher agency through connected learning in preservice educational technology courses. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(3), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1453894
MishraP.,KoehlerM. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge. A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810610800610
38.
MojeE. B. (2008). Responsive literacy teaching in secondary school content-areas: The research we have, the research we need. In ConleyM. (Ed),Adolescent literacy policy and instruction: The research we have and the research we need (pp. 58–87). Guilford Press.
39.
MolinL.,Lantz-AnderssonA. (2016). Significant structuring resources in the reading practices of a digital classroom. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 131–156. https://doi.org/10.28945/3513
NairV.,YunusM. M. (2021). A systematic review of digital storytelling in improving speaking skills. Sustainability, 13(17), 9829. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179829
42.
National Council of Teachers of English and International Reading Association (1996). Standards for the english language arts. National Council of Teachers of English.
National Center for Education Statistics (2019). Nation’s report card. National Assessment of Educational Progress.
46.
NeumanS. B.WongK. M.FlynnR.KaeferT.2019, Learning vocabulary from educational media: The role of pedagogical supports for low-income preschoolers, 111(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000278
47.
PandyaJ. Z. (2012). Unpacking pandora’s box: Issues in the assessment of English Learners’ literacy skill development in multimodal classrooms. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 56(3), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.00124
48.
PressleyT.HaC.LearnE. (2021). Teacher stress and anxiety during COVID-19: An empirical study. School Psychology, 36(5), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000468
49.
Price-DennisD.HolmesK. A.SmithE. (2015). Exploring digital literacy practices in an inclusive classroom. The Reading Teacher, 69(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1398
50.
ReynoldsR.AromiJ.McGowanC.ParisB. (2022). Digital divide, critical-and crisis-informatics perspectives on K-12 emergency remote teaching during the pandemic. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 73(12), 1665–1680. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24654
51.
RobinB. R. (2006). The educational uses of digital storytelling. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.),Proceedings of SITE 2006--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. (pp. 709-716). Orlando, Florida, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/22129/
52.
RobinB. (2007). The effective uses of digital storytelling as a teaching and learning tool. Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (vol. 2). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53.
RobinB. R. (2008). Digital storytelling: A powerful technology tool for the 21st-century classroom. Theory Into Practice, 47(3), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802153916
54.
RobinB. R.,McNeilS. G. (2019). Digital storytelling. In HobbsR.MihailidisP. (Eds), The international encyclopedia of media literacy (pp. 1–8). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118978238.ieml0056
Sanchez-CruzadoC.CampionR. S.Sanchez-CompanaM. T. (2021). Teachers’ digital literacy: The indisputable challenge after COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(4), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000278
57.
SteinkuehlerC. A.BlackR.ClintonK. A. (2005). Researching literacy as a tool, place, and way of being. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(1), 95–100.
