This paper discusses the factors affecting the behaviours for coping with fake news among young people. The data were collected from a survey conducted in late 2019, which sampled 2112 secondary school students from 21 partnering schools. This study aims to understand the opinions and behaviours of teenagers towards disinformation when fake news was prevalent during the anti-extradition bill protests in Hong Kong. It finds that awareness of the problem alone had limited influence in facilitating coping strategies. Civic awareness and interaction with social media were useful predictors of internal and external coping behaviours, respectively. Confidence about one’s ability to detect fake news was a crucial factor, yet a concern for the value of truth stood out as the strongest predictor of fake news coping behaviours.
ApukeO. D.OmarB. (2021). Fake news and COVID-19: Modelling the predictors of fake news sharing among social media users. Telematics and Informatics, 56(2021), 101475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101475.
2.
ArbuthnottK. D. (2009). Education for sustainable development beyond attitude change. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370910945954
3.
ArltD.HoppeI.WollingJ. (2011). Climate change and media usage: Effects on problem awareness and behavioural intentions. International Communication Gazette, 73(1–2), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048510386741
BaronN. S. (2010). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford University Press.
7.
BaymG. (2005). The daily show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22(3), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600591006492
8.
BennettW. L.LivingstonS. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
BodeL.VragaE. K. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12166
11.
BoulianneS. (2016). Online news, civic awareness, and engagement in civic and political life. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1840–1856. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616222
12.
BoydD. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
13.
BraunJ. A.EklundJ. L. (2019). Fake news, real money: Ad tech platforms, profit-driven hoaxes, and the business of journalism. Digital Journalism, 7(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1556314
ChenM.-F. (2016). Extending the theory of planned behavior model to explain people’s energy savings and carbon reduction behavioral intentions to mitigate climate change in Taiwan–moral obligation matters. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(2), 1746–1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.043.
16.
ChuD. (2020). Civic intentionality in youth media participation: The case of Hong Kong. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(4), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1809450
GalanL.OssermanJ.ParkerT.TaylorM. (2019). How young people consume news and the implications. For Mainstream Media.
22.
GorsuchR. L.OrtbergJ. (1983). Moral obligation and attitudes: Their relation to behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(5), 1025–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.5.1025
23.
HadlingtonL.HarkinL. J.KussD.NewmanK.RydingF. C. (2022). Perceptions of fake news, misinformation, and disinformation amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative exploration. Psychology of Popular Media. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000387
24.
HayesA. F.ScheufeleD. A.HugeM. E. (2006). Nonparticipation as self-censorship: Publicly observable political activity in a polarized opinion climate. Political Behavior, 28(3), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-006-9008-3
25.
HermidaA. (2011). Fluid Spaces, Fluid Journalism: The role of the “active recipient” in participatory journalism. In SingerJ.DomingoD.HeinonenA.HermidaA.PaulussenS.QuandtT.ReichZ.VujnovicM. (Eds), Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers (pp. 177–191). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
26.
ItoM.BaumerS.BittantiM.BoydD.CodyR.Herr StephensonB.HorstH. A.LangeP. G.MahendranD.MartínezK. Z.PascoeC. J.PerkelD.RobinsonL.SimsC.TrippL. (2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8402.001.0001
27.
KahanD. M. (2017). Misconceptions, misinformation, and the logic of identity-protective cognition. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2973067.
28.
KangH.BaeK.ZhangS.SundarS. S. (2011). Source cues in online news: Is the proximate source more powerful than distal sources?Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(4), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800403
LeeF. L. F.YuenS.TangG.ChengE. W. (2019). Hong Kong’s summer of uprising: From anti-extradition to anti-authoritarian protests. China Review, 19(4), 1–32.
32.
LEGCO (2019). Measures to tackle online disinformation. LEGCO.
33.
LewandowskyS.EckerU. K. H.CookJ. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008
34.
MarchiR. (2012). With facebook, blogs, and fake news, teens reject journalistic “objectivity. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36(3), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859912458700
35.
MihailidisP. (2018). Civic media literacies: Re-imagining engagement for civic intentionality. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1428623
36.
MindichD. T. (2005). Tuned out: Why Americans under 40 don’t follow the news. Oxford University Press.
37.
NaqshbandiK. Z.LiuC.TaylorS.LimR.AhmadpourN.CalvoR. (2020). I Am most grateful.” using gratitude to improve the sense of relatedness and motivation for online volunteerism. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(14), 1325–1341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1746061
PennycookG.CheyneJ. A.BarrN.KoehlerD. J.FugelsangJ. A. (2015). On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(6), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500006999
41.
PennycookG.RandD. G. (2020). Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of Personality, 88(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12476
42.
PoonK. (2020). The impact of socioeconomic status on parental factors in promoting academic achievement in Chinese children. International Journal of Educational Development, 75(2020), 102175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102175.
43.
Portwood-StacerL. (2013). Media refusal and conspicuous non-consumption: The performative and political dimensions of Facebook abstention. New Media & Society, 15(7), 1041–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812465139
SchudsonM.ZelizerB. (2017). Fake news in context. Understanding and Addressing the Disinformation Ecosystem, 1–4.
47.
SouthwellB.BoudewynsV. (2017). Using behavioral theory to curb misinformation sharing. Understanding and Addressing the Disinformation Ecosystem, 58–63.
48.
SubramanianS. (2017). Inside the Macedonian fake-news complex. Wired Magazine, 15.
49.
TandocE. C. (2019). The facts of fake news: A research review. Sociology Compass, 13(9), Article e12724. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12724
50.
TandocE. C.LimD.LingR. (2020). Diffusion of disinformation: How social media users respond to fake news and why. Journalism, 21(3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919868325
51.
TandocE. C.LingR.WestlundO.DuffyA.GohD.Zheng WeiL. (2018). Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework. New Media & Society, 20(8), 2745–2763. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731756
TingT. (2020). From ‘be water’ to ‘be fire’: Nascent smart mob and networked protests in Hong Kong. Social Movement Studies, 19(3), 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1727736
54.
Van BavelJ. J.PereiraA. (2018). The partisan brain: An identity-based model of political belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004
55.
van der LindenS.RoozenbeekJ.ComptonJ. (2020). Inoculating against fake news about COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(2020), 566790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566790.
56.
VargoC. J.GuoL.AmazeenM. A. (2018). The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society, 20(5), 2028–2049. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817712086
WalterN.CohenJ.HolbertR. L.MoragY. (2020). Fact-checking: A meta-analysis of what works and for whom. Political Communication, 37(3), 350–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894
WattsD. J.RothschildD. M. (2017). The minority report on the fake news crisis: (Spoiler alert: It’s the real news). Understanding and Addressing the Disinformation Ecosystem, 23–37.
61.
YangJ.TianY. (2021). Others are more vulnerable to fake news than I Am”: Third-person effect of COVID-19 fake news on social media users. Computers in Human Behavior, 125(2021), 106950–106950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106950.
62.
ZsókaÁ.SzerényiZ. M.SzéchyA.KocsisT. (2013). Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.030.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
