Fact-Checking or Not? News Verification Behaviours of Young People in Hong Kong

Abstract

This paper discusses the factors affecting the behaviours for coping with fake news among young people. The data were collected from a survey conducted in late 2019, which sampled 2112 secondary school students from 21 partnering schools. This study aims to understand the opinions and behaviours of teenagers towards disinformation when fake news was prevalent during the anti-extradition bill protests in Hong Kong. It finds that awareness of the problem alone had limited influence in facilitating coping strategies. Civic awareness and interaction with social media were useful predictors of internal and external coping behaviours, respectively. Confidence about one’s ability to detect fake news was a crucial factor, yet a concern for the value of truth stood out as the strongest predictor of fake news coping behaviours.

Keywords

curriculum learning literacy teaching social justice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Apuke

O. D.

Omar

(2021). Fake news and COVID-19: Modelling the predictors of fake news sharing among social media users. Telematics and Informatics, 56(2021), 101475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101475.

Arbuthnott

K. D.

(2009). Education for sustainable development beyond attitude change. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370910945954

Arlt

Hoppe

Wolling

(2011). Climate change and media usage: Effects on problem awareness and behavioural intentions. International Communication Gazette, 73(1–2), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048510386741

Bakir

McStay

(2018). Fake news and the economy of emotions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 154–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645

Banjo

Lung

(2019). How fake news and rumors are stoking division in Hong Kong. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-11-11/how-fake-news-is-stoking-violence-and-anger-in-hong-kong

Baron

N. S.

(2010). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford University Press.

Baym

(2005). The daily show: Discursive integration and the reinvention of political journalism. Political Communication, 22(3), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600591006492

Bennett

W. L.

Livingston

(2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317

Berkowitz

Schwartz

D. A.

(2016). Miley, CNN and the onion. Journalism Practice, 10(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2015.1006933

10.

Bode

Vraga

E. K.

(2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12166

11.

Boulianne

(2016). Online news, civic awareness, and engagement in civic and political life. New Media & Society, 18(9), 1840–1856. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815616222

12.

Boyd

(2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.

13.

Braun

J. A.

Eklund

J. L.

(2019). Fake news, real money: Ad tech platforms, profit-driven hoaxes, and the business of journalism. Digital Journalism, 7(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1556314

14.

Chen

(2017). The Fake-News Fallacy Old fights about radio have lessons for new fights about the Internet. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/09/04/the-fake-news-fallacy

15.

Chen

M.-F.

(2016). Extending the theory of planned behavior model to explain people’s energy savings and carbon reduction behavioral intentions to mitigate climate change in Taiwan–moral obligation matters. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(2), 1746–1753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.043.

16.

Chu

(2020). Civic intentionality in youth media participation: The case of Hong Kong. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(4), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1809450

17.

Csutora

(2012). One more awareness gap? The behaviour–impact gap problem. Journal of Consumer Policy, 35(1), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-012-9187-8

18.

Davis

J. L.

Jurgenson

(2014). Context collapse: Theorizing context collusions and collisions. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 476–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.888458

19.

Derakhshan

Wardle

(2017). Information disorder: Definitions. Understanding and Addressing the Disinformation Ecosystem, 5–12.

20.

Eitam

Kennedy

P. M.

Tory Higgins

(2013). Motivation from control. Experimental Brain Research, 229(3), 475–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3370-7

21.

Galan

Osserman

Parker

Taylor

(2019). How young people consume news and the implications. For Mainstream Media.

22.

Gorsuch

R. L.

Ortberg

(1983). Moral obligation and attitudes: Their relation to behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(5), 1025–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.5.1025

23.

Hadlington

Harkin

L. J.

Kuss

Newman

Ryding

F. C.

(2022). Perceptions of fake news, misinformation, and disinformation amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative exploration. Psychology of Popular Media. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000387

24.

Hayes

A. F.

Scheufele

D. A.

Huge

M. E.

(2006). Nonparticipation as self-censorship: Publicly observable political activity in a polarized opinion climate. Political Behavior, 28(3), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-006-9008-3

25.

Hermida

(2011). Fluid Spaces, Fluid Journalism: The role of the “active recipient” in participatory journalism. In Singer

Domingo

Heinonen

Hermida

Paulussen

Quandt

Reich

Vujnovic

(Eds), Participatory journalism: Guarding open gates at online newspapers (pp. 177–191). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

26.

Ito

Baumer

Bittanti

Boyd

Cody

Herr Stephenson

Horst

H. A.

Lange

P. G.

Mahendran

Martínez

K. Z.

Pascoe

C. J.

Perkel

Robinson

Sims

Tripp

(2010). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8402.001.0001

27.

Kahan

D. M.

(2017). Misconceptions, misinformation, and the logic of identity-protective cognition. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2973067.

28.

Kang

Bae

Zhang

Sundar

S. S.

(2011). Source cues in online news: Is the proximate source more powerful than distal sources? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(4), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901108800403

29.

Kiousis

McDevitt

(2005). The genesis of civic awareness: Agenda setting in political socialization. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 756–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb03021.x

30.

Lee

F. L. F.

(2020). Solidarity in the Anti-Extradition Bill movement in Hong Kong. Critical Asian Studies, 52(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2020.1700629

31.

Lee

F. L. F.

Yuen

Tang

Cheng

E. W.

(2019). Hong Kong’s summer of uprising: From anti-extradition to anti-authoritarian protests. China Review, 19(4), 1–32.

32.

LEGCO (2019). Measures to tackle online disinformation. LEGCO.

33.

Lewandowsky

Ecker

U. K. H.

Cook

(2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008

34.

Marchi

(2012). With facebook, blogs, and fake news, teens reject journalistic “objectivity. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36(3), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859912458700

35.

Mihailidis

(2018). Civic media literacies: Re-imagining engagement for civic intentionality. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(2), 152–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1428623

36.

Mindich

D. T.

(2005). Tuned out: Why Americans under 40 don’t follow the news. Oxford University Press.

37.

Naqshbandi

K. Z.

Liu

Taylor

Lim

Ahmadpour

Calvo

(2020). I Am most grateful.” using gratitude to improve the sense of relatedness and motivation for online volunteerism. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(14), 1325–1341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1746061

38.

Neves

B. B.

de Matos

J. M.

Rente

Martins

S. L.

(2015). The ‘non-aligned. YOUNG, 23(2), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1103308815569393

39.

(2018). Most people say they can spot fake news but falter when tested: Survey. The Strait Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/most-people-say-they-can-spot-fake-news-but-falter-when-tested-survey

40.

Pennycook

Cheyne

J. A.

Barr

Koehler

D. J.

Fugelsang

J. A.

(2015). On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(6), 549–563. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500006999

41.

Pennycook

Rand

D. G.

(2020). Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of Personality, 88(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12476

42.

Poon

(2020). The impact of socioeconomic status on parental factors in promoting academic achievement in Chinese children. International Journal of Educational Development, 75(2020), 102175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102175.

43.

Portwood-Stacer

(2013). Media refusal and conspicuous non-consumption: The performative and political dimensions of Facebook abstention. New Media & Society, 15(7), 1041–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812465139

44.

Richardson

(2017). Fake news and journalism education. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 27(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1326365X17702268

45.

RTHK (2020). Fake news” turning young people into criminals: DAB. RTHK News. https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1525884-20200513.htm?spTabChangeable=0

46.

Schudson

Zelizer

(2017). Fake news in context. Understanding and Addressing the Disinformation Ecosystem, 1–4.

47.

Southwell

Boudewyns

(2017). Using behavioral theory to curb misinformation sharing. Understanding and Addressing the Disinformation Ecosystem, 58–63.

48.

Subramanian

(2017). Inside the Macedonian fake-news complex. Wired Magazine, 15.

49.

Tandoc

E. C.

(2019). The facts of fake news: A research review. Sociology Compass, 13(9), Article e12724. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12724

50.

Tandoc

E. C.

Lim

Ling

(2020). Diffusion of disinformation: How social media users respond to fake news and why. Journalism, 21(3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919868325

51.

Tandoc

E. C.

Ling

Westlund

Duffy

Goh

Zheng Wei

(2018). Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework. New Media & Society, 20(8), 2745–2763. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731756

52.

Thorson

(2016). Belief echoes: The persistent effects of corrected misinformation. Political Communication, 33(3), 460–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1102187

53.

Ting

(2020). From ‘be water’ to ‘be fire’: Nascent smart mob and networked protests in Hong Kong. Social Movement Studies, 19(3), 362–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2020.1727736

54.

Van Bavel

J. J.

Pereira

(2018). The partisan brain: An identity-based model of political belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(3), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004

55.

van der Linden

Roozenbeek

Compton

(2020). Inoculating against fake news about COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(2020), 566790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566790.

56.

Vargo

C. J.

Guo

Amazeen

M. A.

(2018). The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society, 20(5), 2028–2049. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817712086

57.

Waisbord

(2018). Truth is what happens to news. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1866–1878. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1492881

58.

Walter

Cohen

Holbert

R. L.

Morag

(2020). Fact-checking: A meta-analysis of what works and for whom. Political Communication, 37(3), 350–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894

59.

Wardle

(2017). Fake news. It’s complicated. First Draft. https://firstdraftnews.org/latest/fake-news-complicated/

60.

Watts

D. J.

Rothschild

D. M.

(2017). The minority report on the fake news crisis: (Spoiler alert: It’s the real news). Understanding and Addressing the Disinformation Ecosystem, 23–37.

61.

Yang

Tian

(2021). Others are more vulnerable to fake news than I Am”: Third-person effect of COVID-19 fake news on social media users. Computers in Human Behavior, 125(2021), 106950–106950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106950.

62.

Zsóka

Á.

Szerényi

Z. M.

Széchy

Kocsis

(2013). Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.030.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.24 MB