English Language Teachers’ Emotion Labor in Response to Online Teaching: An Interpretative Phenomenological Approach

Abstract

Recent iterations of online education emphasize gaining a deeper understanding of teachers’ professional skills, competencies, and performances. In line with this growing scholarship, the present study adopted an interpretative phenomenological analysis approach and examined Iranian English language teachers’ emotion labor in response to online teaching. To this end, data were collected from semi-structured interviews, reflective journals, and narrative frames. Data analysis revealed three themes defining the teachers’ emotion labor: clashes in effective student engagement, conflicts in effective material coverage, and tensions in delivering effective assessment. The study shows how online teaching played an overarching role in the multiplicity and fragmented nature of the teachers’ emotions and how the teachers engaged in surface and deep acting in accordance with the emerging particularities to respond to institutional expectations. Based on the findings, we provide implications for teacher educators and policymakers to run emotion labor-related professional development courses that account for teachers’ emotions and involve them in initiatives responding to their emotion work.

Keywords

emotion labor online teaching online professional development Iranian English teachers interpretative phenomenological analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aagaard

(2017). Introducing postphenomenological research: A brief and selective sketch of phenomenological research methods. International Journal of Qualitative Studies Education, 30(6), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1263884

Acheson

Nelson

(2020). 3. Utilising the emotional labour scale to analyse the form and extent of emotional labour among foreign language teachers in the US public school system. In Gkonou

Dewaele

J.-M.

King

(Eds.), The emotional rollercoaster of language teaching (pp. 31–52). Multilingual Matters.

Acheson

Taylor

Luna

(2016). The burnout spiral: The emotion labor of five rural U.S. foreign language teachers. The Medico-legal Journal, 100(2), 522–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12333

Alemdar

Anılan

(2021). Reflection of social capital in educational processes: Emotional literacy and emotional labor context. Asia Pacific Education Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09701-0

Alshakhi

Le Ha

(2020). Emotion labor and affect in transnational encounters: Insights from Western-trained TESOL professionals in Saudi Arabia. Research in Comparative and International Education, 15(3), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499920946203

Bahcivan

Gurer

M. D.

Yavuzalp

Akayoglu

(2019). Investigating the relations among pre-service teachers’ teaching/learning beliefs and educational technology integration competencies: A structural equation modeling study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(5), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09788-6

Barkhuizen

Wette

(2008). Narrative frames for investigating the experiences of language teachers. System, 36(3), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.02.002

Benesch

(2017). Emotions and English language teaching: Exploring teachers’ emotion labor. Routledge.

Benesch

(2018). Emotions as agency: Feeling rules, emotion labor, and English language teachers’ decision-making. System, 79, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.015

10.

Benesch

(2020a). Emotions and activism: English language teachers’ emotion labor as responses to institutional power. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 17(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2020.1716194

11.

Benesch

(2020b). Theorising emotions from a critical perspective: English language teachers’ emotion labour when responding to student writing. In Gkonou

Dewaele

J.-M.

King

(Eds.), The emotional rollercoaster of language teaching (pp. 53–69). Multilingual Matters.

12.

Colpaert

(2020). Editorial position paper: How virtual is your research? Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1824059

13.

Corlett

Mavin

(2018). Reflexivity and researcher positionality. In Cassell

Cunliffe

Grandy

(Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative business and management research methods (pp. 377–389). Sage.

14.

Dewaele

J.-M.

(2021). Predicting the emotional labor strategies of Chinese English Foreign Language teachers. System, 103, Article 102660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102660

15.

Eatough

Smith

J. A.

(2017). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Willig

Rogers

W. S.

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 193–209). SAGE Publications.

16.

Flores

M. A.

Swennen

(2020). The COVID-19 pandemic and its effects on teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 453–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1824253

17.

Gkonou

Miller

E. R.

(2017). Caring and emotional labour: Language teachers’ engagement with anxious learners in private language school classrooms. Language Teaching Research, 23(3), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817728739

18.

Gkonou

Miller

E. R.

(2021). An exploration of language teacher reflection, emotion labor, and emotional capital. TESOL Quarterly, 55(1), 134–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.580

19.

Her, L., & De Costa, P. (2022). When language teacher emotions and language policy intersect: A critical perspective. System, 105, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102745

20.

Hochschild

A. R.

(1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1086/227049

21.

Hochschild

A. R.

(1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.

22.

Kayi-Aydar

(2021). A framework for positioning analysis: From identifying to analyzing (pre) positions in narrated story lines. System, 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102600

23.

Kocabaş-Gedik

Ortaçtepe Hart

(2021). “It’s not like that at all”: A poststructuralist case study on language teacher identity and emotional labor. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 20(2), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1726756

24.

Lantz-Andersson

Lundin

Selwyn

(2018). Twenty years of online teacher communities: A systematic review of formally-organized and informally-developed professional learning groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 302–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.008

25.

Liu

(2021). Beginning EFL teachers’ emotional labor strategies in the Chinese context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 35–58. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737746

26.

Loh

C. E.

Liew

W. M.

(2016). Voices from the ground: The emotional labour of English teachers’ work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.016

27.

Lyndon

Rawat

P. S.

Pawar

(2020). Is emotional labour a positive experience for teachers? A qualitative study. International Journal of Educational Management, 17. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2020-0149

28.

Miller

E. R.

Gkonou

(2018). Language teacher agency, emotion labor and emotional rewards in tertiary-level English language programs. System, 79, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.002

29.

Naylor

Nyanjom

(2021). Educators’ emotions involved in the transition to online teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(6), 1236–1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1811645

30.

Nazari

Seyri

(2021). Covidentity: examining transitions in teacher identity construction from personal to online classes. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1920921

31.

Nazari, M., & Karimpour, S. (2022). The role of emotion labor in English language teacher identity construction: An activity theory perspective. System, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102811

32.

Nazari, M., & Molana, K. (2022). ‘Predators of emotions’: The role of school assessment policies in English language teachers’ emotion labor. TESOL Quarterly. Advance online Publication September 7, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3188

33.

Neuman

W. L.

(2006). Social research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Pearson Education.

34.

Nias

(1996). Thinking about feeling: The emotions in teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26(3), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764960260301

35.

Smith

J. A.

(2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(1), 39–54.

36.

Smith

J. A.

Flowers

Larkin

(2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. SAGE Publications Ltd.

37.

Song

(2021a). Emotional labour and professional development in ELT. ELT Journal, 75(4), 482–491. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab036

38.

Song

(2021b). Expanding teacher reflection on emotions in online teaching: Grappling with teacher identity and student (non)Participation. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2021.121077

39.

Song

(2022). The emotional landscape of online teaching: An autoethnographic exploration of vulnerability and emotional reflexivity. System, 106, Article 102774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102774

40.

Wang

M. J.

(2014). The current practice of integration of information communication technology to English teaching and the emotions involved in blended learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(3), 188–201.

41.

Zembylas

(2003). Emotions and teacher identity: A poststructural perspective. Teachers and Teaching, 9(3), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600309378