Assessments often fail to clearly answer whether a program “worked” or not. Here, I reflect on the broader purpose of assessment, and offer five questions to consider before undertaking an evaluation: Who are you trying to help? What is the intervention? How will you measure effects? Compared to What? and When will you measure effects? This reflection demonstrates that assessments can reveal more than whether a program worked and provides recommendations for making the most of assessment opportunities.
AbrahamsL.PancorboG.PrimiR.SantosD.KyllonenP.JohnO. P.De FruytF. (2019). Social-emotional skill assessment in children and adolescents: Advances and challenges in personality, clinical, and educational contexts. Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 460–473.
2.
BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263.
3.
BrienzaJ. P.KungF. Y.SantosH. C.BobocelD. R.GrossmannI. (2018). Wisdom, bias, and balance: Toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(6), 1093–1126.
4.
CaspiA.BemD. J.ElderG. H.Jr. (1989). Continuities and consequences of interactional styles across the life course. Journal of Personality, 57(2), 375–406.
5.
ClarkS.SeiderS. (2017, January5–7). How should we teach intellectual character? Student and teacher perspectives on the impact of enculturation on adolescent intellectual character growth [Paper presentation]. Jubilee Centre for Character and Virtues Annual Conference, Oxford, England.
6.
DuckworthA. L.YeagerD. S. (2015). Measurement matters: Assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44(4), 237–251.
7.
H.Gardner (2012). Foreword. In SeiderS. (Ed.), Character compass. Harvard University Press.
8.
HerringtonC. D.MaynardR. (2019). Editors’ introduction: Randomized controlled trials meet the real world: The nature and consequences of null findings. Educational Researcher, 48(9), 577–579.
9.
Lortie-ForguesH.InglisM. (2019). Rigorous large-scale educational RCTs are often uninformative: Should we be concerned?Educational Researcher, 48(3), 158–166.
10.
McCulloughM. E.TsangJ. A.EmmonsR. A. (2004). Gratitude in intermediate affective terrain: Links of grateful moods to individual differences and daily emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 295–309.
11.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451.
12.
YeagerD. S.DweckC. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies?American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269–1285.
13.
ZernikeK. (2016, March1). Testing for grit? Schools pushed on social skills. The New York Times, A1.
