The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of managerial performance on school climate and school quality directly and indirectly. This study used a quantitative method with structural equation model (SEM) analysis on 162 teachers in Bandung, West Java Province, Indonesia. The results of the study showed that school climate mediated the influence of managerial performance on school quality. The influence of managerial performance on school quality was performed directly and indirectly. Managerial performance and school climate simultaneously strongly explained the high and low school quality of 89.2%, whereas the remaining 10.8% was influenced by other factors not examined in this study. It can be concluded that the improvement of school quality is developed on managerial performance and is oriented toward a conducive school climate.
AbrahamS. E.KarnsL. A.ShawK.MenaM. A. (2001). Managerial competencies and the managerial performance appraisal process. Journal of Management Development, 20(10), 842–852.
2.
AgasistiT.BonomiF.SibianoP. (2012). Do the managerial characteristics of schools influence their performance?International Journal of Educational Management, 266(6), 593–609.
3.
AquinoG. V. (1998). Educational administration: Theory and practice. Rex Bookstore.
4.
ChyeL. T.TatH. N.OsmanM. H. M.RasliA. M. D. (2010). Are managerial competencies a blessing to the performance of innovative SMEs in Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Management, 4(1), 120–136.
CohenJ.MccabeE. M.MichelliN. M.PickeralT. (2009). School climate: Research, Policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180–213.
7.
CruzC. D. P.VillenaD. K.NavarroE. V.BelencinaR. R.GarvidaM. D.BelencianaR. R.GarvidaM. D. (2016). Towards enhancing the managerial performance of school heads. International Review of Management and Business Research, 5(2), 705–714.
8.
DanimS. (2012). Motivation, Leadership, and Group Effectiveness. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
9.
DeWittP.SladeS. (2014). School climate change. ASCD.
10.
EngkoswaraA. K.KomariahA. (2020). Motivation, Leadership, and Group Effectiveness. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
11.
Feigenbaum. (1986). Total quality control. McGraw-Hill.
12.
FreibergH. J. (1999). School climate: Measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments. Falmer Press.
13.
HallingerP.WangW. C.ChenC. W. (2013). Assessing the measurement properties of the principal instructional management rating scale: A meta-analysis of reliability studies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 492(2), 272–309.
HolbecheL. (2005). The high performance organization: Creating dynamic stability and sustainable success. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
16.
HolsingerD. B.CowellR. N. (2000). Positioning secondary school education in developing countries. International Institute for Educational, UNESCO
17.
HoyW. K.MiskelC. G. (2001). Educational administration theory: Research, and practice (6th ed., International ed.). McGraw-Hill.
18.
HuangF. L.CornellD. (2018). The relationship of school climate with out-of-school suspensions. Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 378–389.
19.
KomariahA.KurniadyD.RusdinalA. (2019). The relationship between principal role and quality of school academic service: The mediating function of teacher commitment. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 93, 19–34.
20.
LadoA. A.WilsonM. C. (2013). Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective. Journal Academy of Management Review, 194, 699–727.
21.
LaiM.WangL.ShenW. (2017). Educational leadership on the Chinese mainland: A case study of two secondary schools in Beijing. London Review of Education, 152(2), 317–328.
22.
LunenburgF. C. (2010). Communication: The process, barriers, and improving effectiveness. Schooling, 1(1), 1–11.
PanditS. (2001). Thought leaders. Tata McGraw-Hill.
26.
RaoT. V. (2007). Global leadership and managerial competencies of Indian managers (W. P. no. 2007-06-05). Research and Publications, IIMA.
27.
RobbinsP.AlvyH. (2015). The new principal’s fieldbook: Strategies for success. ASCD.
28.
RossD. J.CozzensJ. A. (2016). The principalship: Essential core competencies for instructional leadership and its impact on school climate. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(9). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i9.1562
29.
SammonsP.HillmanJ.MortimoreP. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research [A report by the Institute of Education for the Office for Standards in Education P8]. Institute of Education for the Office for Standards in Education.
30.
SantosoS. (2015). SPSS20 Pengolahan Data Statistik di Era Informasi. PT. Alex Media Komputindo, Kelompok Gramedia.
31.
ScheerensJ.BoskerR. J. (1997). The foundation of education effectiveness. Pergamon Press.
32.
SekaranU. (2006). Research method for business: A skill building approach. Salemba Empat Publisher.
33.
ShannonG. S.BylsmaP. (2005). Promising programs and practices for dropout prevention: Report to the legislature. Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
34.
ShiraziA.MortazviS. (2009). Effective management performance a competency-based perspective. International Review of Business Research Papers, 5(1), 1–10.
35.
SpencerL.SpencerS. (1993). Competence at work: Models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons.
36.
StanleyJ. M. (2016). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass Publishers.
37.
StonerJ. A. F. (1996). Manajemen. Penerbit PT. Prenhallindo.
38.
TanwanichkulN.NgamkanokS.PanhoonS. (2020). An indicator development of effective school management in the eastern region of Thailand. Hatyai Academic Journal, 18(1), 61–79.
39.
ZhengQ.LiL.ChenH.LoebS. (2017). What aspects of principal leadership are most highly correlated with school outcomes in China?Educational Administration Quarterly, 533(3), 409–447.
