The article investigates how a change in educational status from general education to special education is associated with students’ social confidence and academic outcomes. This study uses longitudinal data, a difference-in-difference model, and propensity score matching techniques. Findings indicate that students placed in special education, on average, have lower social confidence and perform worse academically than similarly performing students who remain in general education. Special education can have unintended consequences, and more research is needed to improve students’ educational and social outcomes.
Amrein-BeardsleyA. (2008). Methodological concerns about the education value-added assessment system. Educational Researcher, 37(2), 65–75.
2.
BachmanJ. G.O’MalleyP. M.Freedman-DoanP.TrzesniewskiK. H.DonnellanM. B. (2011). Adolescent self-esteem: Differences by race/ethnicity, gender, and age. Self and Identity, 10(4), 445–473.
3.
BeckerH. S. (2008). Outsiders. Simon & Schuster.
4.
Booher-JenningsJ. (2005). Below the bubble: “Educational triage” and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231–268.
5.
ChenJ.LinT.-J.JusticeL.SawyerB. (2019). The social networks of children with and without disabilities in early childhood special education classrooms. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(7), 2779–2794.
6.
CvencekD.FrybergS. A.CovarrubiasR.MeltzoffA. N. (2018). Self-concepts, self-esteem, and academic achievement of minority and majority North American elementary school children. Child Development, 89(4), 1099–1109.
7.
DipreteT. A.JenningsJ. L. (2012). Social and behavioral skills and the gender gap in early educational achievement. Social Science Research, 41(1), 1–15.
8.
DunnL. M. (1968). Special education for the mildly retarded—Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35(1), 5–22.
9.
DurkheimE. (1951). Suicide: A study in sociology (SpauldingJ. A.SimpsonG., Trans.). Free Press.
10.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.McMasterK. L.LemonsC. J. (2018). Students with disabilities’ abysmal school performance: An introduction to the special issue. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33, 127–130.
11.
GartnerA.LipskyD. K. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students. Harvard Educational Review, 57(4), 367–396.
12.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigm: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice Hall.
13.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2002). Inferring program effects for special populations: Does special education raise achievement for students with disabilities?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4), 584–599.
14.
JonesR. L. (1972). Labels and stigma in special education. Exceptional Children, 38(7), 553–564.
15.
KaufmanS. B.ReynoldsM. R.LiuX.KaufmanA. S.McGrewK. S. (2012). Are cognitive g and academic achievement g one and the same g? An exploration on the Woodcock–Johnson and Kaufman tests. Intelligence, 40(2), 123–138.
16.
MarshH. W.ParkerJ. W. (1984). Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don’t learn to swim as well?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(1), 213–231.
17.
MartínezR. S.Semrud-ClikemanM. (2004). Emotional adjustment and school functioning of young adolescents with multiple versus single learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(5), 411–420.
18.
MorganP. L.FriscoM.FarkasG.HibelJ. (2010). A propensity score matching analysis of the effects of special education services. The Journal of Special Education, 43(4), 236–254.
PijlS. J.FrostadP. (2010). Peer acceptance and self-concept of students with disabilities in regular education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25(1), 93–105.
21.
RosenbergM. (1965). Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Princeton University Press.
22.
RosenbergM.SchoolerC.SchoenbachC.RosenbergF. (1995). Global self-esteem and specific self-esteem: Different concepts, different outcomes. American Sociological Review, 60(1), 141–156.
23.
RosenthalR.JacobsonL. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
24.
SantelicesM. V.WilsonM. (2010). Unfair treatment? The case of freedle, the SAT, and the standardization approach to differential item functioning. Harvard Educational Review, 80(1), 106–134.
25.
ShifrerD. (2013). Stigma of a label educational expectations for high school students labeled with learning disabilities. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 54(4), 462–480.
26.
ShifrerD.CallahanR. M.MullerC. (2013). Equity or marginalization? The high school course-taking of students labeled with a learning disability. American Educational Research Journal, 50(4), 656–682.
27.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629.
28.
StoneW. L.GrecaA. M. L. (1990). The social status of children with learning disabilities: A reexamination. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(1), 32–37.
29.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.LevineP.MarderC. (2007). Perceptions and expectations of youth with disabilities (NCSER 2007-3006). https://ies.ed.gov/ncser/pdf/20073006.pdf
30.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson III tests of achievement. Riverside.
