This study presents an analysis of two teacher educators’ discursive moves. The participants were two teacher educators (TEs) and 46 prospective teachers enrolled in a classroom teaching program. Five coconstructivist teaching implementations were conducted and video recorded. The video-based data were analyzed through systematic observation in two phases: coding and counting. The TEs staged a wide range of discursive moves incorporating 10 higher-order categories (e.g., communicating, evaluating-judging-critiquing, challenging, and seeking evidence) and 39 subcategories. Communicating, monitoring-framing, and evaluating-judging-critiquing moves were found to be the most prominent enacted moves. Recommendations were offered for the professional development of TEs.
AlexanderR. (2005). Towards dialogic teaching (Vol. 2). Cambridge, UK: Dialogos.
2.
AlexanderR. J. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. New York, NY: Dialogos.
3.
BakhtinM. M. (1934). Discourse in the novel (HolquistM.EmersonC., Trans.). In HolquistM. (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays (pp. 259-422). Austin: University of Texas Press.
4.
BakhtinM. M. (1986). Speech genres & other late essays (EmersonC.HolquistM., Eds., McGeeV. W., Trans). Austin: University of Texas Press.
5.
BereiterC. (1994). Implications of postmodernism for science, or, science as progressive discourse. Educational Psychologist, 29, 3-12.
6.
BerryA. (2007). Reconceptualizing teacher educator knowledge as tensions: Exploring the tension between valuing and reconstructing experience. Studying Teacher Education, 3, 117-134.
7.
BrownK.KennedyH. (2011). Learning through conversation: Exploring and extending teacher and children’s involvement in classroom talk. Social Psychology International, 32, 377-396.
8.
BullockS. M.ChristouT. (2009). Exploring the radical middle between theory and practice: A collaborative self-study of beginning teacher educators. Studying Teacher Education, 5, 75-88.
9.
BrunerJ. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In WertschJ. (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 21-34). England: Cambridge University Press.
10.
ChinC. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 815-843.
11.
Cochran-SmithM.LytleS. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge, and university culture. In LoughranJ.HamiltonM.LaBoskeyV.RussellT. (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 601-649). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
12.
CrawfordB. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 916-937.
13.
Dall’AlbaG. (1991). Foreshadowing conceptions of teaching. In RossB. (Ed.), Research and development in higher education (Vol. 13, pp. 293-297). Sydney, Australia: Higher Education Research & Development Society of Australasia.
14.
Darling-HammondL. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15.
DinkelmanT.MargolisJ.SikkengaK. (2006). From teacher to teacher educator: Experiences, expectations, and expatriation. Studying Teacher Education, 2, 5-23.
16.
DoncheV.PetegemP. (2011). Teacher educators’ conceptions of learning to teach and related teaching strategies. Research Papers in Education, 26, 207-222.
17.
EdwardsD.MercerN. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London, England: Methuen.
18.
EngleR. A.ConantF. R. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 399-484.
19.
GadamerH. (2004). Truth and method. New York, NY: Continuum.
20.
GoodwinA. L.KosnikC. (2013). Quality teacher educators = quality teachers? Conceptualizing essential domains of knowledge for those who teach teachers. Teacher Development, 17, 334-346.
21.
HolquistM.EmersonC. (1981). Glossary for the dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (HolquistM., Ed., HolquistM.EmersonC., Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
22.
John-SteinerV.MahnH. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychological, 31, 191-206.
23.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
LemkeJ. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25.
LeontievA. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In WertschJ. V. (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp: 4-33). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
26.
McMahonK. (2012). Case studies of interactive whole-class teaching in primary science: Communicative approach and pedagogic purposes. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1687-1708.
27.
MercerN. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London, England: Routledge.
28.
MercerN. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistic, 1, 137-168.
29.
MercerN. (2010). The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 1-14.
30.
MercerN.WegerifR.DawesL. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 95-111.
31.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.
MortimerE.ScottP. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
33.
MurrayJ. (2005). Re-addressing the priorities: New teacher educators and induction into higher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28, 67-85.
34.
MurrayJ.KosnikC. (2011). Academic work and identities in teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37, 243-246.
35.
PimentelD. S.McNeillK. L. (2013). Conducting talk in science classrooms: Investigating instructional moves and teachers’ beliefs. Science Education, 97, 367-394.
36.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
SamuelowiczK.BainJ. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93-111.
38.
SamuelowiczK.BainJ. D. (2001). Revisiting academics’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, 41, 299-395.
39.
SchonD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
40.
SchonD. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
41.
ScottP. H.MortimerE. F.AguiarO. G. (2006). The tension between authoritative and dialogic discourse: A fundamental characteristic of meaning making interactions in high school science lessons. Science Education, 90, 605-631.
42.
SimonS.ErduranS.OsborneJ. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 137-162.
43.
SuttonC. (1992). Words, science and learning. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
44.
TytlerR.ArandaG. (2015). Expert teachers’ discursive moves in science classroom interactive talk. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 425-446.
45.
van BoovenD. (2015). Revisiting the authoritative-dialogic tension in inquiry-based elementary science teacher questioning. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 1182-1201.
46.
VanasscheE.KelchtermansG. (2016). A narrative analysis of a teacher educator’s professional learning journey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 39, 355-367.
47.
van der VeenC.van KruistumC.MichaelsS. (2015). Productive classroom dialogue as an activity of shared thinking and communicating: A commentary on Marsal. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 22, 320-325.
48.
van HuizenP.van OersB.WubbelsT. (2005). A Vygotskian perspective on teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 267-290.
49.
van ZeeE. H.MinstrellJ. (1997). Reflective discourse: Developing shared understandings in a physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 209-228.
50.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51.
VygotskyL. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In WertschJ. W. (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144-188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
52.
VygotskyL. S. (1987). Thinking and speech (MinickN., Trans.). In RieberR. W.CartonA. S. (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 39-285). New York, NY: Plenum Press. (Original work published 1934)
53.
WegerifR. (2008). Reason and dialogue in education. In van OersB.WardekkerW.ElbersE.van der VeerR. (Eds.), The transformation of learning: Advances in cultural-historical activity theory (pp. 273-286). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
WertschJ. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
55.
WertschJ. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56.
WertschJ. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
WildmanT. M. (2008). Learning. In NeilJ. S.RasmussenK. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of educational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 573-578). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
58.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
59.
ZeichnerK. (2005). Becoming a teacher educator: A personal perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 117-124.
60.
ZeichnerK. (2008). Accumulating knowledge across self-studies in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 36-46.
