This study examined the impact of explicit comprehension strategy instruction supported by guided reading and partner reading on at-risk students’ strategy knowledge and reading comprehension. Participants were 47 first graders (25 in the treatment group; 22 in the control group) and 44 second graders (19 in the treatment group; 25 in the control group). Treatment group participants developed more specific knowledge of strategies, were more likely to apply those strategies during reading, and demonstrated statistically significant growth in reading comprehension. Strong correlations appeared between students’ strategic knowledge and overall comprehension. Implications are addressed at length following the discussion of results.
AltwergerB.AryaP.LasterB.JinL.JordanN.MartensP.. . . WiltzN. (2004). When research and mandates collide: The challenges and dilemmas of teacher education in the era of NCLB. English Education, 36, 119-133.
2.
BartonJ.SawyerD. M. (2003-2004). Our students are ready for this: Comprehension instruction in the elementary school. The Reading Teacher, 57, 334-347.
3.
BeaverJ. M.CarterM. A. (2006). Developmental Reading Assessment–Second Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
4.
BerkeleyS.ScruggsT.MastropieriM. (2010). Reading comprehension instruction for students with learning disabilities, 1995-2006: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 423-436.
5.
BlockC. C.DellamuraR. J. (2000-2001). Better book buddies. The Reading Teacher, 54, 364-370.
6.
BlockC. C.ParisS. R.WhiteleyC. S. (2008). CPMs: A kinesthetic comprehension strategy. The Reading Teacher, 61, 460-470. doi:10.1598/RT.61.6.3
7.
BlockC. C.PressleyM. (2003). Best practices in comprehension instruction. In MorrowL. M.GambrellL. B.PressleyM. (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (2nd ed., pp. 111-126). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
8.
CarlisleJ.KelceyB.BerebitskyD.PhelpsG. (2011). Embracing the complexity of instruction: A study of the effects of teachers’ instruction on students’ reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 409-439.
9.
ChangS. H. (2011). Grade level and gender differences in a reading tutoring program. Reading Horizons, 51, 63-80.
10.
CobbJ. B. (2017). Investigating reading metacognitive strategy awareness of elementary children: A developmental continuum emerges. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 31, 401-418. doi:10.1080/02568543.2017.1309481
11.
ConnorC. M.MorrisonF. J.PetrellaJ. N. (2004). Effective reading comprehension instruction: Examining child x instruction interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 682-698. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.682
12.
DewitzP.JonesJ.LeahyS. (2009). Comprehension strategy instruction in core reading programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 102-126.
13.
DoleJ. A.NokesJ. D.DritsD. (2009). Cognitive strategy instruction. In IsraelS. E.DuffyG. G. (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 347-372). New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
EilersL. H.PinkleyC. (2006). Metacognitive strategies help students to comprehend all text. Reading Improvement, 43, 13-29.
15.
FairbanksC. M.CooperJ. E.MastersonL.WebbS. (2009). Culturally relevant pedagogy and reading comprehension. In IsraelS. E.DuffyG. G. (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 587-606). New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
FawsonP. C.ReutzelD. R. (2000). But I only have a basal: Implementing guided reading in the early grades. The Reading Teacher, 54, 84-97.
17.
FlintT. K. (2010). Making meaning together: Buddy reading in a first grade classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38, 289-297. doi:10.1007/s10643-010-0418-9
18.
FordM. P.OpitzM. F. (2008). A national survey of guided reading practices: What we can learn from primary teachers. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47, 309-331. doi:10.1080/19388070802332895
19.
FountasI. C.PinnellG. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
20.
FountasI. C.PinnellG. S. (2012). Guided reading: The romance and the reality. The Reading Teacher, 66, 268-284. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01123
21.
GarcíaG. E.PearsonP. D.TaylorB. M.BauerE. B.StahlK. A. D. (2011). Socio-constructivist and political views on teachers’ implementation of two types of reading comprehension approaches in low-income schools. Theory Into Practice, 50, 149-156. doi:10.1080/00405841.2011.558444
22.
GuthrieJ.McRaeA.CoddingtonC.LutzK. S.WigfieldA.BarbosaP. (2009). Impacts of comprehensive reading instruction on diverse outcomes of low- and high-achieving readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 195-214.
23.
HagamanJ. L.LuschenK.ReidR. (2010). The “RAP” on reading comprehension. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43, 22-29.
24.
HarrisK. R.PressleyM. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392-405.
25.
HarveyS.GoudvisA. (2007). Strategies that work: Teaching comprehension for understanding and engagement (2nd ed.). Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
26.
KeeneE. O.ZimmermannS. (2007). Mosaic of thought (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
27.
KnappM. S.ShieldsP. M.TurnbullB. J. (1995). Academic challenge in high-poverty classrooms. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 770-776.
28.
LeeS. W.MinS. (2017). Riding the implementation curve: Teacher buy-in and student academic growth under comprehensive school reform programs. The Elementary School Journal, 117, 371-395.
29.
LoweryR. M.Sabis-BurnsD.Anderson-BrownS. (2008). Book buddies: Kindergartners and fifth graders explore books together. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 36(3), 31-37.
30.
LyonsW.ThompsonS. A. (2012). Guided reading in inclusive middle years classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 47, 158-166.
31.
MacGillivrayL.HawesS. (1994). “I don’t know what I’m doing—They all start with B”: First Graders Negotiate Peer Reading Interactions. The Reading Teacher, 48, 210-217.
32.
MahdaviJ. N.TensfeldtL. (2013). Untangling reading comprehension strategy instruction: Assisting struggling readers in the primary grades. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57(2), 77-92.
33.
MartinL. E.KraglerS. (2011). Becoming a self-regulated reader: A study of primary-grade students’ reading strategies. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50, 89-104. doi:10.1080/19388071003594697
34.
MeisingerE. B.SchwanenflugelP. J.BradleyB. A.StahlS. A. (2004). Interaction quality during partner reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 36, 111-140. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3602_1
35.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). National Assessment of Educational Progress: 2015 Reading state snapshot report. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
36.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National reading panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
37.
NessM. (2011). Explicit reading comprehension instruction in elementary classrooms: Teacher use of reading comprehension strategies. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25, 98-117. doi:10.1080/02568543.2010.531076
38.
ParisA. H.ParisS. G. (2007). Teaching narrative comprehension strategies to first graders. Cognition and Instruction, 25, 1-44.
39.
ParisS. G. (2002). Measuring children’s reading development using leveled texts. The Reading Teacher, 56, 168-170.
40.
ParisS. G.HoffmanJ. V. (2004). Reading assessments in kindergarten through third grade: Findings from the Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 105, 199-217.
41.
ParisS. G.LipsonM. Y.WixsonK. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293-316.
42.
ParisS. G.WasikB. A.TurnerJ. C. (1991). The development of strategic readers. In BarrR.KamilM. L.MosenthalP. B.PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: Volume II (pp. 609-640). New York, NY: Longman.
PearsonP. D.DukeN. K. (2002). Comprehension instruction in the primary grades. In BlockC. C.PressleyM. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 247-258). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
45.
PearsonP. D.GallagherM. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317-334.
46.
PilonietaP. (2017). First- and second-grade urban students’ path to comprehension strategy use: A practitioner’s framework. Reading Psychology, 38(4), 369-389.
47.
PressleyM. (2002). Comprehension strategies instruction: A turn-of-the-century status report. In BlockC. C.PressleyM. (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 11-27). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
48.
PressleyM. (2006, April). What the future of reading research could be. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Association, Chicago, IL.
StahlK. A. D. (2004). Proof, practice, and promise: Comprehension strategy instruction in the primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 57, 598-609.
51.
ValentiJ. E.TraceyD. H. (2009). Full-day, half-day, and no preschool: Effects on urban children’s first-grade reading achievement. Education and Urban Society, 41, 695-711. doi:10.1177/0013124509336060
52.
Van den BroekP.KendeouP.LousbergS.VisserG. (2011). Preparing for reading comprehension: Fostering text comprehension skills in preschool and early elementary school children. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 259-268.
53.
WilliamsJ. P. (2005). Instruction in reading comprehension for primary-grade students: A focus on text structure. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 6-18.
54.
WilsonP.MartensP.AryaP. (2005). Accountability for reading and readers: What the numbers don’t tell. The Reading Teacher, 58, 622-631.
