We explore the dynamics of nurturing, caring, and enabling in a social justice school and how a problematic context of educational enabling can develop when notions of nurturing are not balanced with consistent disciplinary consequences. In-depth interviews were conducted with eight school staff, teachers, and a student at a social justice urban school. Observational data and institutional documents were also analyzed, and three main themes emerged revealing the tension between nurturing and enabling: (a) sentimentalist standards, (b) perceptions of authority as oppressive, and (c) contradictions in social justice values. We discuss implications for school policy, multicultural education, and school leadership.
AdamsM.BellL. A.GriffinP. (Eds.). (2007). Teaching for diversity and social justice. New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
AgirdagO.Van AvermaetP.Van HoutteM. (2013). School segregation and math achievement: A mixed-method study on the role of self-fulfilling prophecies. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-50.
3.
AkomA. A. (2003). Reexamining resistance as oppositional behavior: The Nation of Islam and the creation of a Black achievement ideology. Sociology of Education, 76, 305-325.
4.
AvelingN. (2006). “Hacking at our very roots”: Rearticulating White racial identity within the context of teacher education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 9, 261-274.
5.
BalesB. L.SaffoldF. (2011). A new era in the preparation of teachers for urban schools linking multiculturalism, disciplinary-based content, and pedagogy. Urban Education, 46, 953-974.
6.
BergB. L.LuneH.LuneH. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (Vol. 5). Boston, MA: Pearson.
7.
BogotchI. E. (2000). Educational Leadership and Social Justice: Theory into Practice, 2-14.
8.
BondyE.RossD. D. (2008). The teacher as warm demander. Educational Leadership, 66, 54-58.
9.
BorreroN. (2011). Entering teaching for and with love: Visions of pre-service urban teachers. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 7, 18-26.
10.
BoserU. (2011). Teacher diversity matters: A state-by-state analysis of teachers of color. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
11.
BoutteG. S. (2008). Beyond the illusion of diversity: How early childhood teachers can promote social justice. The Social Studies, 99, 165-173.
12.
CharlesworthS. J. (2000). A phenomenology of working-class experience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
ChubbuckS. M. (2010). Individual and structural orientations in socially just teaching: Conceptualization, implementation, and collaborative effort. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 197-210. doi:10.1177/0022487109359777
14.
Duncan-AndradeJ. M. R.MorrellE. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities for moving from theory to practice in urban schools. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
15.
EnnsC. Z. E.SinacoreA. L. (2005). Teaching and social justice: Integrating multicultural and feminist theories in the classroom. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
FlickU. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. New York, NY: SAGE.
17.
GinwrightS.JamesT. (2002). From assets to agents of change: Social justice, organizing, and youth development. New Directions for Youth Development, 2002(96), 27-46.
18.
GoldsteinL. S.LakeV. E. (2000). “Love, love, and more love for children”: Exploring preservice teachers’ understandings of caring. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 861-872.
19.
GoodenM. A.DantleyM. (2012). Centering race in a framework for leadership preparation. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 7, 237-253.
20.
GlasserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The development of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Alden.
21.
HackmanH. W. (2005). Five essential components for social justice education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 38, 103-109.
22.
HargreavesA. (1998). The emotional practice of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 835-854.
23.
HemmingsA. (2006). Moral order in high school authority Dis/enabling care and (un)scrupulous achievement. In PaceJ. L.HemmingsA. (Eds.), Classroom authority: Theory, research and practice (pp. 135-150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
HenryF.TatorC. (2000). The theory and practice of democratic racism in Canada. In KalbachM. A.KalbachW. E. (Eds.), Perspectives on ethnicity in Canada (pp. 285-302). Toronto, Ontario: Harcourt Canada.
25.
HeylB. S. (2001). Ethnographic interviewing. In Handbook of ethnography (pp. 369-383).
26.
IddingsA. C. D.KatzL. (2007). Integrating home and school identities of recent-immigrant Hispanic English language learners through classroom practices. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 6, 299-314.
27.
KleinfeldJ. (1975). Effective teachers of Eskimo and Indian students. The School Review, 83, 301-344.
28.
KumashiroK. K. (2012). Bad teacher!: How blaming teachers distorts the bigger picture. Chicago: Teachers College Press.
29.
LamontM.LamontM. (2009). The dignity of working men: Morality and the boundaries of race, class, and immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
LandsmanJ. (2004). Confronting the racism of low expectations. The Journal of Educational Leadership, 62, 28-32.
31.
LewisJ. L.ReamR. K.BocianK. M.CardulloR. A.HammondK. A.FastL. A. (2012). Con cariño: Teacher caring, math self-efficacy, and math achievement among Hispanic English learners. Teachers College Record, 114(7), 1-42.
32.
MedinaM. A.MorroneA. S.AndersonJ. A. (2005). Promoting social justice in an urban secondary teacher education program. The Clearing House, 78, 207-212.
33.
MilnerH. R. (2008a). Critical race theory and interest convergence as analytic tools in teacher education policies and practices. Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 332-346.
34.
MilnerH. R. (2008b). Disrupting deficit notions of difference: Counter-narratives of teachers and community in urban education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1573-1598.
35.
MintropH.TrujilloT. (2007). The practical relevance of accountability systems for school improvement: A descriptive analysis of California schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29, 319-352. doi:10.3102/0162373707309219
36.
NelsonJ. R.BennerG. J.LaneK.SmithB. W. (2004). Academic achievement of K-12 students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 71, 59-73.
37.
NoddingsN. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
PattersonJ. A.HaleD.StessmanM. (2008). Cultural contradictions and school leaving: A case study of an urban high school. The High School Journal, 91(2), 1-15.
39.
PayneA. A.WelchK. (2010). Modeling the effects of racial threat on punitive and restorative school discipline practices. Criminology, 48(4), 1019-1062.
40.
SeidmanI. (2012). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
41.
SkibaR. J.MichaelR. S.NardoA. C.PetersonR. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34, 317-342.
42.
SpelmanE. V. (1995). Changing the subject: Studies in the appropriation of pain. In BellL.BlumenfeldD. (Eds.), Overcoming racism and sexism (pp. 181-196). London: Rowan & Littlefield.
43.
SueL. (2005). A sociocultural approach to understanding teacher identity, agency and professional vulnerability in a context of secondary school reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 899-916. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.003
WilentzS. (2004). Chants democratic: New York City and the rise of the American working class, 1788-1850. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
46.
ZinnH. (1984). The twentieth century: A people’s history. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
47.
ZembylasM.ChubbuckS. (2009). Emotions and social inequalities: Mobilizing emotions for social justice education. In SchutzP.ZembylasM. (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research (pp. 343-363). Boston, MA: Springer.
