The research reported in this article explored the methods by which concept maps served as formative assessment by capturing changes in the ways preservice mathematics teachers represented their understanding of algebra. The participants were enrolled in a course on high school algebra for teachers and created the maps on the first and last day of the course. Selected concept maps are presented to illustrate the methodology and results of the concept map analyses. Suggestions for ways instructors can use these analyses to make formative decisions are offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaroodyA. J., & BartelsB. H. (2000). Using concept maps to link mathematical ideas.Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 5(9), 604–609.
2.
BlackP., & WiliamD. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning.Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/09695959
3.
BradshawL., IzsákA., TemplinJ., & JacobsonE. (2014). Diagnosing teachers’ understandings of rational numbers: Building a multidimensional test within the diagnostic classification framework.Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 33(1), 2–14. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12020
4.
CarpenterT. P., & LehrerR. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In FennemaE., & RombergT. A. (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 19–32). New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
ChichekianT., & ShoreB. M. (2013). Concept maps provide a window onto preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge in the teaching and learning of mathematics.Canadian Journal of Education/Revue Canadienne de L'éducation, 36(3), 47–71.
6.
HiebertJ., & CarpenterT. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In GrouwsD. A. (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65–97). New York, NY: Macmillan.
7.
HiebertJ., & LefevreP. (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An introductory analysis. In HiebertJ. (Ed.), Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics (pp. 1–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
HillH. C. (2007). Mathematical knowledge of middle school teachers: Implications for the No Child Left Behind policy initiative.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(2), 95–114. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.3102/0162373707301711
9.
HillH. C., SchillingS. G., & BallD. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics knowledge for teaching.The Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1086/428763
10.
HillH. C., SleepL., LewisJ. M., & BallD. L. (2007). Assessing teachers’ mathematical knowledge: What knowledge matters and what evidence counts? In LesterF. K. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 111–155). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Retrieved from http://hub.mspnet.org/index.cfm/17807
11.
HoughS., O'RodeN., TermanN., & WeissglassJ. (2007). Using concept maps to assess change in teachers’ understandings of algebra: A respectful approach.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(1), 23–41. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9025-0
12.
JinH., & WongK. Y. (2015). Mapping conceptual understanding of algebraic concepts: An exploratory investigation involving grade 8 Chinese students.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 683–703. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9500-2
13.
JohnstoneA. H., & OtisK. H. (2006). Concept mapping in problem based learning: a cautionary tale.Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 84–95. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1039/B5RP90017D
14.
KinchinI. M. (2014). Concept mapping as a learning tool in higher education: A critical analysis of recent reviews.The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 62(1), 39–49. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2014.872011
15.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: Author.
16.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: Authors.
17.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: A quest for coherence.Reston, VA: Authors.
18.
NovakJ. D., & GowinD. B. (1984). Learning how to learn.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Ruiz-PrimoM. A., SchultzS. E., LiM., & ShavelsonR. J. (2001). Comparison of the reliability and validity of scores from two concept-mapping techniques*.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 260–278. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200102)38:2<260::AID-TEA1005>3.0.CO;2-F
20.
SchoenfeldA. H. (2014). What makes for powerful classrooms, and how can we support teachers in creating them? A story of research and practice, productively intertwined.Educational Researcher, 43(8), 404–412. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14554450
21.
SchwendimannB. A. (2011). Mapping biological ideas: Concept maps as knowledge integration tools for evolution education.Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/480804ns
22.
ShahF., & BrakonieckiA. (2016). A comparison of instructor and secondary preservice teacher noticings using concept maps. In WoodM. B., TurnerE. E., CivilM., & EliJ. A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 963). Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona.
23.
ShulmanL. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching.Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
24.
SkempR. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding.Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
25.
StarJ. R. (2005). Reconceptualizing procedural knowledge.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), 404–411.
26.
StrautmaneM. (2012). Concept map-based knowledge assessment tasks and their scoring criteria: An overview. In Concept maps: Theory, methodology, technology. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Concept Mapping (Vol. 1, pp. 80–88). Valletta, Malta.
27.
WilliamsC. G. (1998). Using concept maps to assess conceptual knowledge of function.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(4), 414–421. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.2307/749858
