In this article, we focus on the past, the present, and the future. We consider the ways in which Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading (BNR) (Anderson, Hiebert, Scott, & Wilkinson, 1985) fulfilled the authors’ aspirations to introduce into schools everywhere “the practices seen in the classrooms of the best teachers in the best schools” (p. 3). We focus on the emerging literacy chapter and conclude that the authors offered significant insights for the field at a critical time in reading research and in a way that anticipated the future. We also examine some changes in literacy theory and practice since the report was published, including fundamental shifts in the ways many researchers have come to explore literacy as an emerging social practice both at the individual and societal levels. We consider the literacy as a social practice turn, first in relation to literacy theory, and then in two areas critically related to literacy practices in schools today: teaching bi/multilingual children and teacher preparation in literacy. We conclude with a cautionary note regarding reports like BNR and their potential to shape policy, research, and practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersP. L., HoffmanJ. V., & DuffyG. G. (2000). Teaching teachers to teach reading: Paradigm shifts, persistent problems, and challenges. In KamilM. L., MosenthalP. B., PearsonP. D., & BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 719–742). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
AndersonL. M., & StillmanJ. A. (2013, March 01). Student teaching's contribution to preservice teacher development: A review of research focused on the preparation of teachers for urban and high-needs contexts.Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 3–69.
3.
AndersonR. C., HiebertE. H., ScottJ. A., & WilkinsonI. A. G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading.Washington, DC: National Academy of Education, National Institute of Education, & Center for the Study of Reading.
4.
AuerP. (1984). Bilingual conversation.Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins.
5.
AustinM. C., & MorrisonC. (1961). The torch lighters: Tomorrow's teachers of reading.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
AustinM. C., & MorrisonC. (1963). The first r: The Harvard report on reading in elementary schools.New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.
7.
BallD., & CohenD. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as a learning profession (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
8.
BartonD., & HamiltonM. (1998). Local literacies: Reading and writing in one community.London, UK: Routledge.
9.
BartonD., HamiltonM., & IvanicR. (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context.London, UK: Routledge.
10.
BerryB., MontgomeryD., RachelC., HernandezM., WurtzelJ., & SnyderJ. (2008). Creating and sustaining urban teacher residencies: A new way to recruit, prepare, and retain effective teachers in high-needs districts.Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
11.
BlommaertJ. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13.
BrownA., CollinsA., & DuguidP. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher,18(1), 32–42.
14.
ChallJ. S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
15.
CreeseA., & BlackledgeA. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching?The Modern Language Journal,94(1), 103–115.
16.
DanielsonK. (2016). Literacy content and core practices: Teacher educator pedagogy as the bridge between knowing and doing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
17.
DanielsonK., & SchutzK. M. (2015, December). Rehearsing interactive read alouds: Fertile ground for targeting literacy content, core practices and principles of teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Literacy Research Association, Carlsbad, CA.
18.
Darling-HammondL. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education,57(3), 300–314.
19.
Darling-HammondL., & Baratz-SnowdenJ. (2007). A good teacher in every classroom: Preparing the highly qualified teachers our children deserve.Educational Horizons,85(2), 111–132.
20.
DeGraffT. L., SchmidtC. M., & WaddellJ. H. (2015). Field-based teacher education in literacy: Preparing teachers in real classroom contexts.Teaching Education,26(4), 366–382.
21.
DeweyJ. (1910). How we think.Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
22.
DuffyG. G. (2004). Teachers who improve reading achievement: What research says about what they do and how to develop them. In StricklandD., & KamilM. (Eds.), Improving reading achievement through professional development (pp. 3–22). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
23.
DuffyG. G., & HoffmanJ. V. (1999). In pursuit of an illusion: The flawed search for a perfect method.The Reading Teacher,53(1), 10–16.
24.
FreireP. (1998). Pedagogy of freedom.Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
25.
GarciaE. E., JensenB. T., & ScribnerK. P. (2009). The demographic imperative.Educational Leadership,66(7), 8–13.
26.
GarcíaO. (2007). Foreword. In MakoniS., & PennycookA. (Eds.), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. xi–xv). Clevedon, UK: Mulitilingual Matters.
27.
GarciaO. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective.Malden, MA: Wiley/Blackwell.
28.
GarciaO., & KleifgenJ. (2010). Emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs, and practices for English language learners.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
29.
GarciaO., & KleynT. (2016). Translanguaging with multilingual students: Learning from classroom moments.NewYork, NY: Routledge.
30.
GardinerW., & SalmonD. (2014). Bridging the theory-practice gap in an urban teacher residency: Two interventions and a cautionary note.Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research,10, 87–100.
31.
GeeJ. P. (2010). A situated-sociocultual approach to literacy and technology. In BakerE., & LeuD. (Eds.), The new literacies: Multiple perspectives on research and practice (pp. 165–193). NewYork, NY: Guilford.
32.
GeeJ. P. (2015). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (5th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
GrossmanP., ComptonC., IgraD., RonfeldtM., ShahanE., & WilliamsonP. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective.Teachers College Record,111(9), 2055–2100.
GrossmanP., & McDonaldM. (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teacher education.American Educational Research Journal,45(1), 184–205.
36.
GumperzJ. J. (1982). Language and social identity.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
GutierrezK., & RogoffB. (2003). Cultural ways of learning.Educational Researcher,35(5), 19–25.
38.
HammernessK. (2006). From coherence in theory to coherence in practice.Teachers College Record,108(7), 1241–1265.
39.
HeathS. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms.London, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40.
HellerM. (1999). Linguistic minorities and modernity: A sociolinguistic ethnography.London, UK: Longman.
41.
HoffmanJ., RollerC., MalochB., SailorsM., DuffyG., & BeretvasS. (2005). Teachers’ preparation to teach reading and their experiences and practices in the first three years of teaching.The Elementary School Journal,105(3), 267–287.
42.
JanksH. (2010). Literacy and power.NewYork, NY: Routledge.
43.
KennedyM. (1999). The role of preservice teacher education. In Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp., 54–85). Malden, MA: Wiley.
44.
LampertM. (2010). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean?Journal of Teacher Education,61(1–2), 21–34.
45.
LaveJ. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice.Mind, Culture, and Activity,3(4), 149–164.
LewisG., JonesB., & BakerC. (2012). Translanguaging: Origins and development from school to street and beyond.Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice,18, 641–654.
48.
LortieD. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
49.
LukeA., & FreebodyP. (1997). The social practices of reading. In MusprattS., LukeA., & FreebodyP. (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies (pp. 185–225). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
50.
MakoniS., & PennycookA. (2005). Disinventing and (re)constituting languages.Critical Inquiry in Language Studies,2(3), 137–156.
51.
MatskoK. K., & HammernessK. (2014). Unpacking the “urban” in urban teacher education: Making a case for context-specific preparation.Journal of Teacher Education,65(2), 128–144.
52.
McDonaldM., KazemiE., & KavanaghS. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity.Journal of Teacher Education,64(5), 378–386.
53.
NicholsS. L., & BerlinerD. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America's schools.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
54.
PalmerD. K., MartinezR. A., MateusS. G., & HendersonK. (2014). Reframing the debate on language separation: Toward a vision for translanguaging pedagogies in the dual language classroom.The Modern Language Journal,98, 757–772.
55.
PennycookA. (2010). Language as a local practice.London, UK: Routledge.
56.
RogoffB. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In WertschJ. V., RioP. D., & AlvarezA. (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
SchatzkiT. R., CetinaK. K., & SavignyE. (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory.London, UK: Routledge.
58.
SchutzK. M. (2011, April). Learning to teach amidst the buzz: The case of a literacy methods course. In D. Ball (Chair), Design problems in practice-focused teacher education: Identifying and teaching high-leverage practices. Symposium presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, New Orleans, LA.
59.
SmagorinskyP., & BarnesM. E. (2014). Revisiting and revising the apprenticeship of observation.Teacher Education Quarterly,41(4), 29–52.
60.
SmagorinskyP., RhymD., & MooreC. P. (2013). Competing centers of gravity: A beginning English teacher's socialization process within conflictual settings.English Education,45(2), 147–183.
61.
SmithA. T., & PlaceN. A. (2011). Fostering teaching and learning through an inquiry-based literacy methods course.The New Educator,7(4), 305–324.
62.
SnowC. E., GriffinP., & BurnsM. S. (2005). Knowledge to support the teaching of reading: Preparing teachers for a changing world.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
63.
StreetB.V. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice.NewYork, NY: Cambridge University Press.
64.
StreetB. V. (1993). The new literacies studies: Guest editorial.Journal of Research in Reading,16(2), 81–97.
65.
StreetB. V. (2003). What's “new” in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice.Current Issues in Comparative Education,5(2). 77–91.
66.
ValenciaS. W., MartinS. D., PlaceN. A., & GrossmanP. (2009). Complex interactions in student teaching: Lost opportunities for learning.Journal of Teacher Education,60(3), 304–322.
67.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68.
WengerE. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
69.
ZeichnerK. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education.Journal of Teacher Education,89(11), 89–99.
