AlibertD. (1988, June). Towards new customs in the classroom.For the learning of mathematics, 8(2), 31–35, 43.
3.
AndersonJ. R. (1976). Language, memory, and thought.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
AndersonJ. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
5.
AndersonJ. R. (1985). Cognitive Psychology and its implications (2nd ed.). New York: Freeman.
6.
BalacheffN. (1987). Devolution d'un probleme et construction d'une conjecture: Le cas de “la somme des angles d'un triangle.”Cahier de didactique des mathematiques No. 39. Paris: 1REM Universite Paris VII.
7.
BallD. (1988). Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy: Examining what prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
8.
BarwiseK. J., & PerryJ. (1983). Situations and attitudes.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
BauersfeldH. (1979). Hidden dimensions in the so-called reality of a mathematics classroom. In LeshR., & SecadaW. (Eds.), Some theoretical issues in mathematics education: papers from a research presession (pp. 13–32). Columbus, OH: ERIC.
10.
BegleE. (1979). Critical variables in mathematics education.Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
11.
BloomB. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook I. Cognitive domain. Handbook II: Affective domain.New York: David McKay.
12.
BrownA. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In ReinerF., & KluweR. (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
BrownJ. S., & BurtonR. R. (1978). Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills.Cognitive Science,2, 155–192.
14.
BrownJ. S., CollinsA., & DuguidP. (1989, January–February). Situated cognition and the culture of learning.Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
15.
BurkhardtH. (1988). Teaching problem solving. In BurkhardtH., GrovesS., SchoenfeldA., & StaceyK. (Eds.), Problem solving—A world view (Proceedings of the problem solving theme group, ICME 5) (pp. 17–42). Nottingham: Shell Centre.
16.
BurkhardtH., GrovesS., SchoenfeldA., & StaceyK. (Eds.). (1988). Problem solving—A world view. (Proceedings of the problem solving theme group, ICME 5).Nottingham: Shell Centre.
17.
California State Department of Education. (1985). Mathematics framework for California public schools kindergarten through grade twelve.Sacramento, CA: California State Department of Education.
18.
California State Department of Education. (1989). A question of thinking.Sacramento, CA: State Department.
19.
California State Department of Education. (forthcoming). Mathematics framework for California public schools kindergarten through grade twelve.Sacramento, CA: California State Department of Education.
20.
CarpenterT. P. (1985). Learning to add and subtract: An exercise in problem solving. In SilverE. A. (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 17–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
CarpenterT. P., LindquistM. M., MatthewsW., & SilverE. A. (1983). Results of the third NAEP mathematics assessment: Secondary School.Mathematics Teacher,76(9), 652–659.
22.
CarssM. (Ed.). (1986). Proceedings of the Fifth International Congress on Mathematics Education.Boston.: Birkhäuser.
23.
CharlesR., & SilverE. A. (Eds.). (1988). The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
CollinsA., BrownJ. S., & NewmanS. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. In ResnickL. B. (Ed.), Knowing learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
CooneyT. (1985). A beginning teacher's view of problem solving.Journal for research in mathematics education, 16(5). 324–336.
26.
DavisP., & HershR. (1981). The mathematical experience.Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
27.
deGrootA. (1965). Thought and choice in chess.The Hague: Mouton
28.
DescartesR. (1952). Rules for the direction of the mind (E. S. Haldane and G. R. I. Ross, Trans.). In Great Books of the Western World (Vol. 31). Chicago: Encyclopedia Brittanica, Inc.
29.
diSessaA. (1983). Phenomenology and the evolution of intuition. In GentnerD., & StevensA. (Eds.), Mental Models (pp. 15–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
DosseyJ., MullisI., LindquistM., & ChambersD. (1988). The mathematics report card: Are we measuring up? Trends and achievement based on the 1986 National Assessment.Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
31.
DunckerK. (1945). On problem solving.Psychological Monographs 58, No. 5 (Whole # 270.) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
32.
EricssonK., & SimonH. (1980). Verbal reports as data.Psychological review,87(3), 215–251.
33.
FawcettH. P. (1938). The nature of proof (1938 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). New York: Columbia University Teachers College Bureau of Publications.
34.
FlavellJ. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In ResnickL. (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
FlavellJ. H., FriedrichsA. G., & HoytJ. D. (1970). Developmental changes in memorizations processes.Cognitive psychology1, 323–340.
36.
GarofaloJ., & LesterF. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and mathematical performance.Journal for research in mathematics education., 16(3), 163–176.
37.
GeertzC. (1983). Local knowledge.New York: Basic Books.
38.
GreenoJ. (1988). For the study of mathematics epistemology. In CharlesR., & SilverE. (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 23–31). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
39.
GronerR., GronerM., & BischofW. (Eds.). (1983). Methods of heuristics.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
GrovesS., & StaceyK. (1984). The Burwood Box.Melbourne, Australia: Victoria College, Burwood.
42.
HadamardJ. (1945). An essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
43.
HalmosP. (1980). The heart of mathematics.American Mathematical Monthly, 87, 519–524.
44.
HarveyJ. G., & RombergT. A. (1980). Problem-Solving studies in mathematics.Madison, WI: Wisconsin Research and Development Center Monograph Series.
45.
Hayes-RothB., & Hayes-RothF. (1979). “A cognitive model of planning.Cognitive Science,3, 275–31.
46.
HellerJ., & HungateH. (1985). Implications for mathematics instruction of research on scientific problem solving. In SilverE. A. (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 83–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
47.
HiebettJ. (1985). (Ed.) Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case of mathematics.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
HinsleyD. A., HayesJ. R., & SimonH. A.From words to equations: meaning and representation in algebra word problems. In JustM., & CarpenterP. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in comprehension (pp. 89–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
HoffmanK. (1989, March). The science of patterns: A practical philosophy of mathematics education. Paper presented to the Special Interest Group for Research in Mathematics Education at the 1989 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (1987). The underachieving curriculum: assessing U.S. school mathematics from an international perspective.Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing Company.
52.
JamesW. (1890). Principles of Psychology (2 volumes). New York: Holt.
53.
JanvierC. (Ed.). (1897). Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
KantowskiM. G. (1977). Processes involved in mathematical problem solving.Journal for research in mathematics education, 8, 163–180.
55.
KaputJ. (1985). Representation and problem solving: Issues related to modeling. In SilverE. A. (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 381–398). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56.
KaputJ. (1989). Linking representations in the symbol system of algebra. In WagnerS., & KieranC. (Eds.), Research Issues in the learning and teaching of algebra (pp. 167–194). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57.
Karmiloff-SmithA. (1979) Problem solving construction and representations of closed railway circuits.Archives of psychology, 47, 37–59.
58.
KilpatrickJ. (1967). Analyzing the solution of word problems in mathematics: An exploratory study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University).Dissertation Abstracts International,28, 4380A (University Microfilms 68–5, 442.)
59.
KilpatrickJ. (1978). Variables and methodologies in research on problem solving. In HatfieldL. (Ed.), Mathematical problem solving (pp. 7–20). Columbus, OH: ERIC.
60.
KilpatrickJ. (1985). A retrospective account of the past twenty-five years of research on teaching mathematical problem solving. In SilverE. A., Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 1–16). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
61.
KitcherP. (1984). The nature of mathematical knowledge.New York: Oxford University Press.
62.
KrulikS. (Ed.). (1980). Problem solving in school mathematics. (1980 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). Reston, VA: NCTM.
63.
KrutetskiiV. A. (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in school children (TellerJ., Trans; KilpatrickJ., & WirszupI., Eds.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64.
LakatosI. (1977). Proofs and refutations (revised ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
LakatosI. (1978). Mathematics, science, and epistemology.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66.
LampertM. (1990). When the problem is not the problem and the solution is not the answer. Mathematical knowing and teaching.American Educational Research Journal,27(1), 29–63.
67.
LaveJ. (1988). Cognition in practice.Boston: Cambridge University Press.
68.
LaveJ. (in preparation). Tailored learning: Apprenticeship and everyday practice among craftsmen in West Africa.
69.
LaveJ., SmithS., & ButlerM. (1988). Problem solving as everyday practice. In CharlesR., & SilverE. (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 61–81). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
70.
LaveJ., & WengerE. (1989). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. (Manuscript available from author. School of Education University of California, Berkeley.)
71.
LeshR. (1983). Metacognition in mathematical problem solving. Unpublished manuscript. Available from author, Educational Testing Service, Rosedale Road, Princeton, NJ.
72.
LeshR. (1985). Conceptual analyses of problem solving performance. In SilverE. A. (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 309–330). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
73.
LesterF., GarofaloJ., & KrollD. (1989). The role of metacognition in mathematical problem solving: A study of two grade seven classes. Final report to the National Science Foundation of NSF project MDR 85-50346.
74.
LucasJ. (1974). The teaching of heuristic problem-solving strategies in elementary calculus.Journal for research in mathematics education, 5, 36–46.
MayerR. (1985). Implications of cognitive psychology for instruction in mathematical problem solving. In SilverE. A. (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 123–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
77.
McLeodD., & AdamsV. (1989). Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new perspective.New York: Springer-Verlag.
78.
MeadG. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79.
MillerG. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review63, 81–97.
80.
MilneW. J. (1897). A mental arithmetic.New York: American Book.
81.
MinskyM. (1961). Steps toward artificial intelligence.Proceedings of the institute of radio engineers,49, 8–30.
82.
MinskyM. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. (1977). In WinstonP. (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 170–195). New York: McGraw-Hill.
83.
MoschkovichJ. (1989). Constructing a problem space through appropriation: A case study of tutoring during computer exploration. Paper presented at the 1989 annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
84.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1983). The third national mathematics assessment: Results, trends, and issues (Report No. 13-MA-01). Denver, CO: Educational Commission of the States.
85.
National Center of Educational Statistics. (1988a). Trends in minority enrollment in higher education. Fall 1986–Fall 1988.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
86.
National Center of Educational Statistics (1988b). Digest of education statistics. 1988.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
87.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
88.
National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics. (1977, October). Position paper on basic mathematical skills.Arithmetic teacher25, 19–22.
89.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1980). An agenda for action.Reston, VA: NCTM.
90.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: NCTM.
91.
National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
92.
National Research Council. (1990a). Reshaping school mathematics. A philosophy and framework for curriculum.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
93.
National Research Council. (1990b). A challenge of numbers.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
94.
NewellA. (1983) “The heuristic of George Pólya and its relation to artificial intelligence. In GronerR., GronerM., & BischofW. (Eds.), Methods of heuristics (pp. 195–243). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
95.
NewellA., & SimonH. (1972). Human problem solving.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
96.
NewmanD., GriffinP., & ColeM. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
97.
NormanD. (Ed.). (1970). Models of human memory.New York: Academic Press.
98.
NovakJ., (Ed.). (1987). Proceedings of the second international seminar on misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics.Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
99.
Oxford University Press. Oxford English Dictionary (compact ed.). Oxford: Author.
100.
PalincsarA., & BrownA. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities.Cognition and Instruction,1(2), pp. 117–175.
101.
PavlovI. P. (1928). Lectures on conditioned reflexes (3rd ed.). (W. H. Gantt, Trans.) New York: International Publishers.
102.
PeaR. (1989). Socializing the knowledge transfer problem. (IRL report IRL 89-0009). Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.
103.
PetersR. S. (1962) Brett's history of psychology (edited and abridged by PetersR. S.). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
104.
PetersonP., FennemaE., CarpenterT., & LoefM. (1989). Teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs in mathematics.Cognition and instruction6(1), 1–40.
105.
PiagetJ. (1928). The language and thought of the child.New York: Harcourt Brace.
106.
PiagetJ. (1930). The child's conception of physical causality.New York: Harcourt Brace.
107.
PiagetJ. (1954). The construction of reality in the child (M. Cook, trans.) New York: Ballantine Books.
108.
PiagetJ. (1971). The child's conception of time. (original French version published 1927). New York: Ballantine Books.
109.
PoincaréH. (1913). The foundations of science (G. H. Halstead, Trans.). New York: Science Press.
110.
PollakH. (1987). Cognitive science and mathematics education: A mathematician's perspective. In SchoenfeldA. H. (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 253–264). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
111.
PólyaG. (1945; 2nd edition, 1957). How to solve it.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
112.
PólyaG. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning: Vol. 1. Induction and analogy in mathematics. Vol. 2. Patterns of plausible inference.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
PólyaG., & SzegoG. (1925). Aufgaben und Lebrsätze aus der Analysis I.Berlin, Germany: Springer. An English version, Problems and theorems in analysis I (D. Aeppli, Trans.), was published by Springer (New York) in 1972.
115.
PutnamR. T., LampertM., & PetersonP. (1989). Alternative perspectives on knowing mathematics in elementary schools. Elementary subjects center series number 11. Michigan State University: Center for learning and teaching elementary subjects.
116.
ResnickL. (1988). Treating mathematics as an ill-structured discipline. In CharlesR., & SilverE. (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 32–60). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
117.
RisslandE. (1985). Artificial intelligence and the learning of mathematics: A tutorial sampling. In SilverE. A. (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 147–176). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
118.
RogoffB., & LaveJ. (Eds.). (1984). Everyday cognition: Its development in social context.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
119.
RombergT., & CarpenterT. (1986). Research in teaching and learning mathematics: Two disciplines of scientific inquiry. In WittrockM. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed. pp. 850–873). New York: Macmillan.
120.
RyleG. (1949). The concept of mind.London: Hutchinson.
121.
SacerdotiE. (1974) “Planning in a hierarchy of abstraction spaces.Artificial intelligence5, 115–136.
122.
ScardamaliaM., & BereiterC. (1983). Child as co-investigator: Helping children to gain insight into their own mental processes. In ParisS. G., OlsonM., & StevensonH. W. (Eds.), Learning and Motivation in the Classroom (pp. 61–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
123.
SchankR., & AbelsonR. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
124.
SchoenfeldA. (1983). Problem solving in the mathematics curriculum: A report, recommendations, and an annotated bibliography.Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
125.
SchoenfeldA. (1985a). Mathematical problem solving.New York: Academic Press.
126.
SchoenfeldA. (1985b). Metacognitive and epistemological issues in mathematical understanding. In SilverE. A. (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 361–380). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
127.
SchoenfeldA. (1987a). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In SchoenfeldA. (Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education (pp. 189–215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
128.
SchoenfeldA. (1987b, December). Pólya, problem solving, and education.Mathematics magazine, 60(5), 283–291.
129.
SchoenfeldA. (1988, Spring). When good teaching leads to bad results: the disasters of “well taught” mathematics classes.Educational psychologist, 23(2), 145–166.
130.
SchoenfeldA. (1989a). Problem solving in context(s). In CharlesR., & SilverE. (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving, (pp. 82–92). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
131.
SchoenfeldA. (1989b). Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behavior.Journal for research in mathematics education., 20(4), 338–355.
132.
SchoenfeldA. (1989c). Ideas in the air: Speculations on small group learning, environmental and cultural influences on cognition, and epistemology.International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 71–88.
133.
SchoenfeldA. (1989d). Teaching mathematical thinking and problem solving. In ResnickL. B., & KlopferB. L. (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (pp. 83–103). (1989 Yearbook of the American Society for Curriculum Development). Washington, DC: ASCD.
134.
SchoenfeldA. (Ed.) (1990a). A source book for college mathematics teaching.Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
135.
SchoenfeldA. (1990b). On mathematics as sense-making: An informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics. In PerkinsD. N., SegalJ., & VossJ. (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 281–300). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
136.
SchoenfeldA. (in preparation). Reflections on doing and teaching mathematics. In SchoenfeldA. (Ed.), Mathematical thinking and problem solving.
137.
SchoenfeldA., SmithJ., & ArcaviA. (in press). Learning: The microgenetic analysis of one student's understanding of a complex subject matter domain. In GlaserR. (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
138.
ShaughnessyM. (1985). Problem-solving derailers: The influence of misconceptions on problem solving performance. In SilverE. A. (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 399–416). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
139.
Shell Centre for Mathematical Education. (1984). Problems with patterns and numbers.Nottingham, England: Shell Centre.
140.
SilverE. A. (1979). Student perceptions of relatedness among mathematical verbal problems.Journal for research in mathematics education, 10(3), 195–210.
141.
SilverE. A. (1981). Recall of mathematical problem information: Solving related problems.Journal for research in mathematics education, 12(1), 54–64.
142.
SilverE. A. (1982). Thinking about problem solving: Toward an understanding of metacognitive aspects of problem solving. Paper presented at the Conference on Thinking, Suva, Fiji, January.
143.
SilverE. A. (Ed.). (1985). Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
144.
SilverE. A. (1987). Foundations of cognitive theory and research for mathematics problem solving instruction. In SchoenfeldA. (Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education (pp. 33–60). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
145.
SilverE. A., BrancaN., & AdamsV. (1980). Metacognition: The missing link in problem solving? In KarplusR. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 429–433). Boston: Birkhäuser.
146.
SimonH. (1979). Information processing models of cognition.Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 363–96.
147.
SimonH. (1980). Problem solving and education. In TumaD., & ReifF. (Eds.), Problem solving and education: Issues in teaching and research (pp. 81–96). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
148.
SkinnerB. F. (1974). About behaviorism.New York: Knopf.
149.
SmithJ. P. (1973). The effect of general versus specific heuristics in mathematical problem solving tasks.Dissertation Abstracts International, 34, 2400A. (University Microfilms 73-26, 637.)
150.
SowderL. (1985). Cognitive psychology and mathematical problem solving: A discussion of Mayer's paper. In SilverE. A. (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 139–145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
151.
StanicG., & KilpatrickJ. (1988). Historical perspectives on problem solving in the mathematics curriculum. In CharlesR., & SilverE. (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (pp. 1–22). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
152.
SteenL. (1988, April 29). The science of patterns.Science, 240, 611–616.
153.
StevensonH. W., LeeS-Y., & StiglerJ. W. (14 February 1986). Mathematics Achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American Children.Science, 231, 693–698.
154.
StiglerJ., & PerryM. (1989). Cross cultural studies of mathematics teaching and learning: Recent findings and new directions. In GrouwsD., & CooneyT. (Eds.), Effective Mathematics Teaching (pp. 194–223). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
155.
StipekD. J., & WeiszJ. R. (1981). Perceived personal control and academic achievement.Review of Educational Research51(1), 101–137.
156.
StodolskyS. S. (1985). Telling math: Origins of math aversion and anxiety.Educational Psychologist20, 125–133.
157.
SuinnR. M., EdieC. A., NicolettiJ., & SpinelliP. R. (1972). The MARS, a measure of mathematics anxiety: Psychometric data.Journal of clinical psychology,28, 373–375.
158.
ThompsonA. (1985). Teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and the teaching of problem solving. In SilverE. A., Teaching and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 281–294). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
159.
ThorndikeE. L. (1924). Mental discipline in high school studies.Journal of Educational Psychology, 15, 1–22, 83–98.
160.
ThorndikeE. L., & WoodworthR. S. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function on the efficiency of other mental functions (1).Psychological Review, 8, 247–261.
161.
TobiasS. (1978). Overcoming math anxiety.New York: W. W. Norton.
162.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in Society.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
163.
WagnerS., & KieranC. (Eds.). (1989). Research issues in the learning and teaching of algebra.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
164.
WallasG. (1926). The art of thought. Selections in P. E. Vernon (Ed., 1970), Creativity, Middlesex, England: Penguin, pp. 91–97.
165.
WatsonJ. (1930). Behaviorism (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
166.
WatsonR. I. (1978). The great psychologists.Philadelphia: Lippincott.
167.
Webster's. (1979). New Universal Unabridged Dictionary.Second edition. New York: Simon & Schuster.
168.
WertheimerM. (1945/1959). Productive thinking.New York: Harper and Row.
169.
WilsonJ. (1967) “Generality of heuristics as an instructional variable.Dissertation Abstracts International, 28.2575A. (University Microfilms 67-17, 526).
170.
WundtW. (1904). Principles of physiological psychology (5th German ed., Vol. 1). (E. B. Titchener, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
171.
ZwengM., GreenT., KilpatrickJ., PollakH., & SuydamM. (Eds.). (1983). Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress on Mathematics Education.Boston: Birkhäuser.