Over the past 50 years, substantial changes have occurred in the texts used for the instruction for beginning reading. This article analyzes four prominent perspectives that have most influenced beginning reading instruction texts in the United States over this period. This article examines changes in beginning reading texts in relation to changes in the nation's demographics and young children's literacy-related experiences, including media exposure, availability of children's books, and time spent in nonparental care. These analyses are followed by an examination of the research underlying three assumptions that shape the reading instruction found in all current core reading programs: (a) earlier is better, (b) word repetition is not a factor in learning to read, and (c) one size fits all. The review ends with a call for the careful design and selection of texts for students whose literacy levels are impacted greatly by the quality of their school experiences–-children in high-poverty communities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AaronI. E., ArtleyA. S., GoodmanK. S., HuckC. S., JenkinsW. A., ManningJ. C., … WepmanJ. M. (1971). Scott Foresman reading systems.Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Company.
2.
AdamsM. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print.Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
AfferbachP., BeersJ., BlachowiczC., BoydC. D., DifflyD., Gaunty-PorterD., … WixsonK. K. (2000). Scott Foresman reading.Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Company.
5.
AfferbachP., BlachowiczC., BoydC. D., CheyneyW., JuelC., Kame'enuiE., … WixsonK. K. (2008). Reading street.Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Company.
6.
AfferbachP., BlachowiczC., BoydC. D., IzquierdoE., JuelC., Kame'enuiE., … WixsonK. K. (2013). Scott Foresman reading street: Common core.Glenview IL: Pearson.
7.
AllingtonR. L., AskewB. J., BlachowiczC., ButlerA., ColeJ., EdwardsP. A., … TierneyR. J. (1993). Celebrate reading.Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Company.
8.
AndersonR. C., HiebertE. H., ScottJ. A., & WilkinsonI. A. G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission on Reading.Champaign, IL: The Center for the Study of Reading, National Institute of Education, National Academy of Education.
9.
AustinM. C., & MorrisonC. (1963). The first R: The Harvard report on reading in elementary schools (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Macmillan.
10.
BearD. R., DoleJ. A., EchevarriaJ., HasbrouckJ. E., ParisS. G., ShanahanT., & TinajeroJ. V. (2008). Macmillan/McGraw-Hill treasures.Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.
BeckI. L., & McCaslinE. S. (1978). An analysis of dimensions that affect the development of code-breaking ability in eight beginning reading programs (Technical Report #6). Pittsburgh, PA: Learning Research and Development Center.
13.
BloomfieldL., & BarnhartC. L. (1961). Let's read: A linguistic approach.Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
14.
BogartD. (2010). Library and book trade almanac (55th ed.). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
15.
BradleyR. H., & CorwynR. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development.Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371–399.
16.
BrysbaertM., WarrinerA. B., & KupermanV. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas.Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911.
17.
California English/Language Arts Committee (1987). English-Language Arts framework for California public schools (kindergarten through grade twelve).Sacramento, CA: Department of Education.
18.
California English/Language Arts Committee (1999). English-Language Arts framework for California public schools (kindergarten through grade twelve).Sacramento: CA Department of Education.
19.
California State Board of Education (2006). Reading/Language Arts framework for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve.Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
20.
CamarotaS. A. (2012). Immigrants in the United States, 2010: A profile of America's foreign-born population.Washington, DC: Center for Immigration Studies.
21.
CampbellJ., DonahueP., ReeseC. M., & PhillipsG. (1996). NAEP 1994 reading report card for the nation and the states.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
22.
CarlisleJ. F., & KatzL. (2006). Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading of derived words.Reading and Writing, 19(7), 669–693.
23.
ChallJ. S. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
24.
ChallJ. S. (1983a). Learning to read: The great debate (Updated ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
25.
ChallJ. S. (1983b). Stages of reading development.New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
26.
ChallJ. S., & SquireJ. R. (1991). The publishing industry and textbooks. In BarrR., KamilM. L., MosenthalP. B., & PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 120–146). White Plains, NY: Longman.
27.
ClaessensA., DuncanG., & EngelM. (2009). Kindergarten skills and fifth-grade achievement: Evidence from the ECLS-K.Economics of Education Review, 28, 415–427.
28.
CooperJ. D., PikulskiJ. J., AckermanP. A., AuK. H., ChardD. J., GarciaG., … VogtM. (2002). Houghton Mifflin reading.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
29.
DavisM. R. (2011, March 17). Moving beyond one-size-fits-all.Education Week, pp. 10–11.
30.
DentonK., & WestJ. (2002). Children's reading and mathematics achievement in kindergarten and first grade.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
31.
DentonK., WestJ., & WalstonJ. (2003). Reading—young children's achievement and classroom experiences from the condition of education (NCES-2003-070). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
32.
DurkinD. (1966). Children who read early: Two longitudinal studies.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
33.
DurkinD. (1987). A classroom-observation study of reading instruction in kindergartenEarly Childhood Research Quarterly,2(3), 275–300. doi:10.1016/0885-2006(87)90036-6
34.
EhriL. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In BarrR., KamilM. L., MosenthalP. B., & PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 383–417). New York, NY: Longman.
35.
ElsonW. H., & GrayW. S. (1930). Elson basic readers.Chicago, IL: Scott Foresman and Company.
36.
EricssonK. A., & LehmannA. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptations to task constraints.Annual Review of Psychology, 47(1), 273–305.
37.
EsquithR. (2004). There are no shortcuts.New York, NY: Anchor.
38.
FischS. M. (2004). Children's learning from educational television: Sesame Street and beyond.New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
FitzgeraldJ., ElmoreJ., Relyea-KimE. J., HiebertE. H., & StennerA.J. (in press). Has first-grade core-reading-program text-complexity changed across six decades?Reading Research Quarterly.
40.
FitzgeraldJ., HiebertE. H., BowenK., ElmoreJ., Relyea-KimE.J., & KungM. (2015). Text complexity: Primary teachers' views.Literacy Research and Instruction, 54(1), 19–44.
41.
FlanaganK. D., McPheeC., & MulliganG. (2009). The children born in 2001 at kindergarten entry: First findings from the kindergarten data collections of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B). (NCES 2010-005). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
42.
FleschR. (1955). Why Johnny can't read: And what you can do about it.New York, NY: Harper.
43.
FoormanB. R., FrancisD. J., DavidsonK. C., HarmM. W., & GriffinJ. (2004). Variability in text features in six grade 1 basal reading programs.Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(2), 167–197.
44.
GambrellL. B., WilsonR. M., & GanttW. N. (1981). Classroom observations of task-attending behaviors of good and poor readers.Journal of Educational Research, 74(6), 400–404.
45.
GamseB. C., JacobR. T., HorstM., BoulayB., & UnluF. (2008). Reading First impact study final report.Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
46.
GatesA. I. (1930). Interest and ability in reading.New York, NY: Macmillan.
47.
GatesA. I., & HuberM. B. (1930). Round the year.New York, NY: Macmillan.
48.
GibsonC. J., & LennonE. (1999, February). Historical census statistics on the foreign-born population of the United States: 1950-1990.Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
49.
GravesM. F., JuelC., & GravesB. B. (2004). Teaching reading in the 21st century (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
50.
GrayW. S. (1925). Reading activities in school and in social life. In WhippleG. M. (Ed.), The twenty-four th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Part I (pp. 1–8). Bloomington, IL: Public School Publishing Company.
51.
GrayW. S., BaruchD., & MontgomeryE. (1940). Basic readers: Curriculum foundation series.Chicago, IL: Scott Foresman and Company.
52.
GriecoE. M., AcostaY. D., de la CruzG. P., GambinoC., GrynT., LarsenL. J., … WaltersN. P. (2012, May). The foreign-born population in the United States: 2010.Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/acs-19.pdf
HiebertE. H. (1983). A comparison of young children's self-selected reading words and basal reading words.Reading Improvement, 20(1), 41–44.
55.
HiebertE. H. (1999). Text matters in learning to read (Distinguished Educators Series).The Reading Teacher, 52(6), 552–568.
56.
HiebertE. H. (2005). State reform policies and the task textbooks pose for first-grade readers.Elementary School Journal, 105(3), 45–266. Hiebert, E. H., & Papierz, J. M. (1990). The emergent literacy construct and kindergarten and readiness books of basal reading series. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 5(3), 317-334.
57.
HustonA. C., AndersonD. R., WrightJ. C., LinebargerD. L., & SchmittK. L. (2000). Sesame Street viewers as adolescents: The recontact study. In FischS. M., & TruglioR. T. (Eds.), G for “growing”: Thirty years of research on children and Sesame Street (pp. 131–143). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
58.
JacksonR., McCoyA., PistorinoC., WilkinsonA., BurghardtJ., ClarkM., … SwankP. (2007). National evaluation of Early Reading First: Final report.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
59.
JenkinsJ. R., PeytonJ. A., SandersE. A., & VadasyP. F. (2004). Effects of reading decodable texts in supplemental first-grade tutoring.Scientific Studies of Reading, 8(1), 53–85.
60.
JohnstonF. R. (2000). Word learning in predictable text.Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 248–255.
61.
JuelC. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of fifty-four children from first through fourth grades.Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437–447.
62.
JuelC., & Roper/SchneiderD. (1985). The influence of basal readers on first grade reading.Reading Research Quarterly, 20(2), 134–152.
63.
KandelW. A. (2011, January). The U.S. foreign-born population: Trends and selected characteristics.Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41592.pdf
64.
KochharR. (2008). Sharp decline in income for non-citizen immigrant households, 2006-2007.Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center.
65.
KupermanV., Stadthagen-GonzalezH., & BrysbaertM. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words.Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 978–990.
66.
LackE. (2011, November 22). Tell me how to deal with Angry Birds! [Web log message]. Retrieved from blogs.babycenter.com
67.
LandauerT. K., KireyevK., & PanaccioneC. (2011). Word maturity: A new metric for word knowledge.Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(1), 92–108.
68.
LaxonV., GallagherA., & MastersonJ. (2002). The effects of familiarity, orthographic neighbourhood density, letter-length and graphemic complexity on children's reading accuracy.British Journal of Psychology, 93(2), 269–287.
69.
LevineA. (1996). America's reading crisis: Why the whole language approach to teaching reading has failed millions of children.Parents, 16, 63–65, 68.
70.
LevittS. D., & DubnerS. J. (2005). Freakonomics.New York, NY: HarperCollins.
71.
LoniganC. J., & ShanahanT. (2009). Executive summary: Developing early literacy—Report of the National Early Literacy Panel.Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
72.
MacKinnonA. R. (1959). How do children learn to read? An experimental investigation.Toronto, ON: The Copp Clark Publishing Co.
73.
MartinetC., ValdoisS., & FayolM. (2004). Lexical orthographic knowledge develops from the beginning of literacy acquisition.Cognition, 91(2), 11–22.
74.
MenonS., & HiebertE. H. (2005). A comparison of first graders' reading with little books or literature-based basal anthologies.Reading Research Quarterly, 40(1), 12–38.
75.
MesmerH. A., CunninghamJ. W., & HiebertE. H. (2012). Toward a theoretical model of primary-grade text complexity: Learning from the past, anticipating the future.Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3), 235–258.
76.
MesmerH. A., & HiebertE. H. (in press). Third graders' reading proficiency with texts varying in complexity and length: Responses of students in an urban, high-needs school.Journal of Literacy Research.
77.
MielkeK. W. (2000). A review of research on the educational and social impact of Sesame Street. In FischS. M., & TruglioR. T. (Eds.), G is for growing: Thirty years of research on children and Sesame Street (pp. 85–96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
78.
MulliganG. M., HastedtS., & McCarrollJ. C. (2012). First-time kindergartners in 2010-11: First findings from the kindergarten rounds of the early childhood longitudinal study, kindergarten class of 2010-11 (ECLS-K: 2011). NCES 2012-049.National Center for Education Statistics.
79.
MurrayM., MungerK. A., & HiebertE. H. (2014). An analysis of two reading intervention programs: How do the words, texts, and programs compare?Elementary School Journal, 114(4), 479–500.
80.
NagyW. E., & HiebertE. H. (2011). Toward a theory of word selection. In KamilM.L., PearsonP. D., MojeE. B., & AfflerbachP. P. (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 4; pp. 388–404). New York, NY: Longman.
81.
NationP. (2004). A study of the most frequent word families in the British National Corpus. In BogaardsP., & LauferB. (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language (pp. 3–14). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
82.
National Center for Education Statistics (2009). The nation's report card: Reading 2009 (NCES 2010-458). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
83.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers [NGACBP & CCSSO] (2010). Common Core state standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects (with Appendices A & B).Washington, DC: Author.
84.
ParisS. G. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills.Reading Research Quarterly, 40(2), 184–202.
85.
RobinsonH., MonroeM., & ArtleyA. S. (1962). The new basic readers.Chicago, IL: Scott Foresman and Company.
86.
SadoskiM., & PaivioA. (2000). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
87.
SchrammW. L. (1968). Television in the lives of children.Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
88.
ShareD. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition.Cognition, 55(2), 151–218.
89.
SmithN. B. (1965). American reading instruction: Its development and its significance in gaining a perspective on current practices in reading.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
90.
SnowC. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension.Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
91.
SteinM. L., JohnsonB. J., & GutlohnL. (1999). Analyzing beginning reading programs: The relationship between decoding instruction and text.Remedial and Special Education, 20(5), 275–287.
92.
StickneyJ. H. (1885/1985). A primer.Boston, MA: Ginn and Company.
93.
SuggateS. P. (2009). School entry age and reading achievement in the 2006 Programme for International Student Achievement (PISA).International Journal of Educational Research, 48(3), 151–161.
94.
SuggateS., SchaughencyE., & ReeseE. (2008). Age of beginning formal reading instruction and later literacy: Evidence from longitudinal research.Proceedings from the International Congress of Psychology. Berlin, Germany.
95.
Texas Education Agency (1990). Proclamation of the State Board of Education advertising for bids on textbooks.Austin, TX: Author.
96.
Texas Education Agency (1997). Proclamation of the State Board of Education advertising for bids on textbooks.Austin, TX: Author.
97.
Texas Education Agency (2005). Proclamation of the State Board of Education advertising for bids on textbooks.Austin, TX: Author.
98.
ThompsonG. B., CottrellD. S., & Fletcher-FlinnC. M. (1996). Sublexical orthographic-phonological relations early in the acquisition of reading: The knowledge sources account.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62(2), 190–222.
99.
ThorndikeE. L. (1903). Educational psychology.New York, NY: Lemcke & Buechner.
100.
ThorndikeE. L. (1921). The teacher's word book.New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
101.
TrosethG. L., SaylorM. M., & ArcherA. H. (2006). Young children's use of video as a source of socially relevant information.Child Development, 77(3), 786–788.
102.
U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, Education & Social Stratification Branch, Fall school enrollment of the civilian noninstitutional population 5 to 34 years old, by level of school, age, color, and sex, for the United States: October 1961, Table 5. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/school/p20-117.html
U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, Education & Social Stratification Branch, Fall school enrollment of the population 3 to 34 years old, by level and control of school, race, sex, and metropolitan-monmetropolitan residence, for the United States: October 1970, Table 4. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/school/p20-222.html
105.
U.S. Congress (January, 2002). The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Pub. L. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425, enacted January 8, 2002).
106.
U.S. Congress (October 3, 1965). The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 (Pub. L. 89-236, 79 Stat. 911, enacted June 30, 1968).
107.
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, 1986 State Summaries of Elementary and Secondary School Civil Rights Survey and National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data Survey, Table 44 (prepared May 2000). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d00/dt044.asp
108.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Schools and Staffing Survey, Public School Data File, 2003-04. Percentage distribution of public school students, by sex, race/ethnicity, percentage minority, and state: 2003-04. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/sass/tables/state_2004_02.asp
109.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD), State Nonfiscal Survey of Public Elementary/Secondary Education, 1996-97 and 2006-07. (Table prepared October 2008). Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d08/tables/dt08_041.asp
110.
Van SteenselR. (2006). Relations between socio-cultural factors, the home literacy environment and children's literacy development in the first years of primary education.Journal of Research in Reading, 29(4), 367–382.
111.
ZenoS. M., IvensS. H., MillardR. T., & DuvvuriR. (1995). The educator's word frequency guide.Brewster, NY: TASA.
112.
GeiselT. S. (1957). The cat in the hat.New York, NY: Random House.
113.
GeiselT. S. (1960). Green eggs and ham.New York, NY: Random House.
114.
MartinB. (1967). Brown bear, brown bear, what do you see?New York, NY: Henry Holt & Co.
