The visual arts and media historically employed by teachers as a corollary to “traditional” social education can play a more vital role in promoting critical inquiry among students. The use of short films like The Flying Man (2013), a 2013 motion picture which depicts an almost mythic vigilante in a realistic world, can help educators highlight relevant contemporary issues and support an active, constructivist role for student critique. This article describes the role of visual media, the applications of visual art pedagogy, and the potential of works like The Flying Man to foster critical inquiry in a nontraditional manner.
BartonK. C., & LevstikL. (2004). Teaching history for the common good.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
BersonI. R., & BersonM. J. (2001). Growing up in the aftermath of terrorism. Social Studies and the Young Learner, November/December, 7–9.
4.
BrileyR. (1997). Hollywood and the rebel image in the 1950s. Social Education, 61(6), 352–358.
5.
BritzmanD. P. (1998). Lost subjects, contested objects: Toward a psychoanalytic inquiry of learning.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
6.
ButlerA., ZarombF., LyleK., & RoedigerH. (2009). Using popular films to enhance classroom learning: The good, the bad, and the interesting. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1161–1168.
CaseR., & WrightI. (1997). Taking seriously the teaching of critical thinking. In CaseR., & ClarkP. (Eds.), The Canadian anthology of social studies (pp. 179–93). Vancouver, BC: Pacific Educational Press.
9.
CromerM., & ClarkP. (2007). Getting graphic with the past: Graphic novels and the teaching of history. Theory & Research in Social Education35(4), 574–591.
10.
DuncumP. (2002). The theories and practices of visual culture in art education. Arts Education Policy Review, 105(2), 19–25.
11.
EisnerE. W. (1991). Art, music, and literature within the social studies. In ShaverJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching and learning (pp. 551–558). New York, NY: Macmillan.
12.
GabellaM. S. (1994). Beyond the looking glass: Bringing students into the conversation of historical inquiry. Theory & Research in Social Education, 22(3), 340–363.
GarrettH. J. (2011). The routing and re-routing of difficult knowledge: Social studies teachers encounter When the levees broke. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(3), 320–347.
GunnJ. H. (2012). Using feature films to teach history and social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 38(4), 647–650.
17.
HessD. E. (2002). Discussing controversial public issues in secondary social studies classrooms: Learning from skilled teachers. Theory & Research in Social Education, 30(1), 10–41.
18.
HessD. (2007). From “Banished” to “Brother Outsider,” “Miss Navajo” to “An Inconvenient Truth”: Documentary films as perspective-laden narratives. Social Education, 71(4), 194–99.
19.
HobbsR. (1999). The uses (and misuses) of mass media resources in secondary schools. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED439452)
20.
HouserN. O. (2005). Arts, aesthetics, and citizenship education: Democracy as experience in a postmodern world. Theory & Research in Social Education, 33(1), 45–72.
21.
LewisonM., FlintA. S., & SluysK.V. (2002). Taking on critical literacy: The journey of newcomers and novices. Language Arts, 79(5), 382–392.
22.
MackeyM., & McClayJ. K. (2000). Graphic routes to electronic literacy: Polysemy and picture books. Changing English, 7(2), 191–201.
23.
MarcusA. (2005). “It is as it was”: Feature film in the history classroom. The Social Studies, 96(2), 61–67.
24.
MarcusA. (2007). Students making sense of the past: “It's almost like living the event.” In MarcusA. (Ed.), Celluloid blackboard: Teaching history with film (pp. 121–166). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
25.
MarcusA. S., & LevineT. H. (2007). Exploring the past with feature film. In MarcusA. (Ed.), Celluloid blackboard: Teaching history with film (pp. 1–13). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
26.
MarcusA. S., PaxtonR. J., & MeyersonP. (2006). “The reality of it all”: History students read the movies. Theory & Research in Social Education, 34(4), 516–552.
27.
MarcusA. S., & StoddardJ. (2007). Tinsel town as teacher: Hollywood film in the high school classroom. The History Teacher, 40(3), 303–330.
28.
MarcusA. S., & StoddardJ. D. (2009). The inconvenient truth about teaching history with documentary film: Strategies for presenting multiple perspectives and teaching controversial issues. The Social Studies, November/December, 279–284.
29.
MathewsS. A. (2009). Disrupting The Amazing Race: Education, exploration, and exploitation in reality television. Theory & Research in Social Education, 37(2), 247–271.
30.
McDonnellM. (2002). Making a case for the case-study method. Social Education, 66(1), 68–69.
31.
MetzgerS. A. (2005). The kingdom of heaven: Teaching the Crusades. Social Education, 69(5), 256–262.
32.
MetzgerS. A., & SuhY. (2008). Significant or safe? Two cases of instructional uses of history feature films. Theory & Research in Social Education, 36(1), 88–109.
33.
MeyersL. E., HolbrookT., & MayL. A. (2009). Beyond heroes and role models: Using biographies to develop young change agents. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 21(3), 10–14.
34.
ParkerW. C. (1996). Curriculum for democracy. In SodorR. (Ed.), Democracy, education, and the schools (pp. 182–210). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
PittA. J., & BritzmanD. P. (2003). Speculations on qualities of difficult knowledge in teaching and learning: An experiment in psychoanalytic research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(6), 755–776.
37.
RosenstoneR. A. (1995). Visions of the past: The challenge of film to our idea of history.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
RosenstoneR. (2006). History on film/film on history.Harlow, UK: Pearson.
39.
RussellW. B. (2009). Teaching social issues with film.Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
40.
ScheurmanG., & NewmannF. (1998). Authentic intellectual work in social studies: Putting performance before pedagogy. Social Education, 62(1), 23–25.
41.
SeixasP. (1994a). Confronting the moral frames of popular film: Young people respond to historical revisionism. American Journal of Education, 102(1), 261–285.
42.
SeixasP. (1994b). Students’ understanding of historical significance. Theory and Research in Social Education, 22(3), 281–304.
43.
SeixasP. (2001). Review of research on social studies. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 545–65). New York, NY: Macmillan.
StoddardJ. (2007). Attempting to understand the lives of others: Film as a tool for developing historical empathy. In MarcusA. (Ed.), Celluloid blackboard: Teaching history with film (pp. 187–214). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
47.
StoddardJ. (2009). The ideological implications of using “educational” film to teach controversial events. Curriculum Inquiry, 39(3), 407–433.
48.
StoddardJ., & MarcusA. (2010). More than “showing what happened”: Exploring the potential for teaching history with film. The High School Journal93(2), 83–90.
ThorntonS. (1991). Teacher as curricular-instructional gatekeeper in social studies. In ShaverJ. (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies: Teaching and learning (pp. 237–248). New York, NY: Macmillan.
51.
WeinsteinP. B. (2001). Movies as the gateway to history: The history and film project. The History Teacher, 35(1), 183–192.
52.
WernerW. (2002). Reading visual texts. Theory & Research in Social Education, 30(3), 401–428.
53.
RuckaG., & BrubakerE. (2003). Gotham Central.New York, NY: DC Comics.
54.
CampbellJ. (1972). The hero with a thousand faces.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
