Survey methods were employed to learn more about teachers’ attitudes toward graphic novels and how graphic novels are used in their classrooms. Questions explored participants’ attitudes and actual classroom use. The survey research sought to determine if teachers are open to using graphic novels and the extent of their willingness to do so. Though teachers report willingness to use graphic novels and other graphica, they are limited in their attempts to do so by lack of instructional models, lack of graphic novels in the classroom, and their own level of comfort with the genre.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarthesR. (1967). Writing degree zero. (A. Lavers & C. Smith, Trans.). New York, NY: Hill and Wang. (Original work published 1953).
2.
BurmarkL. (2008). Visual literacy: What you get is what you see. In FisherD. & FreyN. (Eds.), Teaching visual literacy: Using comic books, graphic novels, anime, cartoons, and more to develop comprehension and thinking skills (pp. 5–25), Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
3.
CarterJ. B. (2009). (2009). Going graphic. Educational Leadership, 66(6), 68–73.
4.
CaryS. (2004). Going graphic: Comics at work in the multilingual classroom.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
5.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts & literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects.Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
6.
CroceK., MartensP., MartensR., & MaderazoC. (2009). Students developing as meaning makers of the pictorial and written texts in picturebooks. In LeanderK. M., RoweD.W., DickinsonD., HundleyM., JimenezR., & RiskoV. (Eds.), 58th National Reading Conference Yearbook (pp. 156–169). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
7.
DemkoM., & HedrickW. (2010). Teachers become zombies: The ugly side of scripted reading curriculum. Voices from the Middle, 17(3), 62–64.
8.
FairbrotherA. (2000). Confessions of a canon-loving multiculturalist: School reform and the language arts classroom. Multicultural Education, 7(3), 12–15.
9.
FreyN. (2010). Reading and writing with graphic novels. The California Reader, 44(1), 15–22.
10.
FreyN., & FisherD. (2004). Using graphic novels, anime, and the Internet in an urban high school. English Journal, 93, 19–25.
HibbingA. N., & Rankin-EricksonJ. L. (2003). A picture is worth a thousand words: Using visual images to improve comprehension for middle school struggling readers. The Reading Teacher, 56, 758–770.
13.
HolmanC. H., & HarmonW. (1992). A handbook to literature (6th ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co.
14.
IsaacS., & MichaelW. B. (1995). Handbook in research and evaluation for education and the behavioral science, (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: EdITS/Educational and Industrial Testing Services.
15.
JacobsD. (2007). More than words: Comics as a means of teaching multiple literacies. English Journal, 96, 19–26.
16.
LankshearC., & KnobelM. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning.Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
17.
LeuD. J.Jr., KinzerC. K., CoiroJ., & CammackD. W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In RuddellR. B., & UnrauN. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1570–1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
18.
McTaggartJ. (2008). Graphic novels: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In FisherD. & FreyN. (Eds.), Teaching visual literacy: Using comic books, graphic novels, anime, cartoons, and more to develop comprehension and thinking skills (pp. 27–46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
19.
MossB. (2008). Getting the picture: Visual dimensions of informational texts. In FloodJ., HeathS. B., & LappD. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 393–398). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
RakesG. C. (1999). Teaching visual literacy in a multimedia age. TechTrends, 43(4), 14–18.
22.
SadoskiM., & PaivioA. (2004). A dual coding theoretical model of reading. In RuddellR. B. & UnrauN. (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1329–1362). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
23.
SipeL. (2008). Young children's visual meaning making in response to picturebooks. In FloodJ., HeathS. B., & LappD. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 381–391). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
24.
SmetanaL., OdelsonD., BurnsH., & GrishamD. L. (2009). Using graphic novels in the high school classroom: Engaging deaf students with a new genre. The Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 53, 228–240.
