AndersonR. C., & BiddleW. B. (1975). On asking people questions about what they are reading. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 9, pp. 9–129). New York: Academic Press.
2.
AndersonR. C., & PearsonP. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In PearsonP. D., BarrR., KamilM. L., & MosenthalP. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). New York: Longman.
3.
AndersonR. C., WilkinsonI. A. G., MasonJ. M., & ShireyL. (1987, December). Prediction versus word-level questions. In R. C. Anderson (Chair), Experimental investigations of prediction in small-group reading lessons. Symposium conducted at the 37th annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, St. Petersburg Beach, FL.
4.
ArmbrusterB. B., & AndersonT. H. (1980). The effect of mapping on the free recall of expository text (Tech. Rep. No. 160). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
5.
ArmbrusterB. B., AndersonT. H., & MeyerJ. L. (1990). The framing project: A collaboration to improve content area reading using instructional graphics (Tech. Rep.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
6.
ArmbrusterB. B., AndersonT. H., & OstertagJ. (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text?Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 331–346.
7.
AuK. H., & RaphaelT. E. (1998). Curriculum and teaching in literature-based programs. In RaphaelT. E., & AuK. H. (Eds.), Literature-based instruction: Reshaping the curriculum (pp. 123–148). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
8.
AusabelD. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
9.
BartlettB. J. (1978). Top-level structure as an organizational strategy for recall of class room text. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.
10.
BaumannJ. F., Seifert-KesselN., & JonesL. A. (1992). Effect of think-aloud instruction on elementary students' comprehension monitoring abilities. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 143–172.
11.
BeanT. W., & SteenwykF. L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders' summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 297–306.
12.
BeckI. L., McKeownM. G., & GromollE. W. (1989). Learning from social studies texts. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 99–158.
13.
BeckI. L., McKeownM. G., HamiltonR. L., & KucanL. (1997). Questioning the author: An approach for enhancing student engagement with text.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
14.
BeckI. L., McKeownM. G., SandoraC., & WorthyJ. (1996). Questioning the author: A yearlong classroom implementation to engage students with text. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 385–414.
15.
BereiterC., & BirdM. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 131–156.
BrownA. L., CampioneJ. C., & DayJ. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10, 14–21.
18.
BrownA. L., & PalinscarA. S. (1985). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strategies: A natural history of one programme for enhancing learning. (Tech. Rep. No. 334). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
19.
BrownR., PressleyM., Van MeterP., & SchuderT. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low-achieving second-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 18–37.
20.
CunninghamJ. W. (1982). Generating interactions between schemata and text. In NilesJ. A., & HarrisL. A. (Eds.), New inquiries in reading research and instruction (pp. 42–47). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
21.
DavisJ. N., LangeD. L., & SamuelsS. J. (1988). Effects of text structure instruction on foreign language readers' recall of a scientific journal article. Journal of Reading Behavior, 20, 203–214.
22.
DoleJ. A., BrownK. J., & TrathenW. (1996). The effects of strategy instruction on the comprehension performance of at-risk students. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 62–88.
23.
DoleJ. A., DuffyG. G., RoehlerL. R., & PearsonP. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239–264.
24.
DurkinD (1978). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481–533.
25.
FieldingL. G., AndersonR. C., & PearsonP. D. (1990). How discussion questions influence children's story understanding (Tech. Rep. No. 490). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
26.
FitzgeraldJ., & SpiegelD. L. (1983). Enhancing children's reading comprehension through instruction in narrative structure. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 1–17.
27.
GallagherM., & PearsonP. D. (1989). Discussion, comprehension, and knowledge acquisition in content area classrooms (Tech. Rep. No. 480). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
28.
GevaE (1983). Facilitating reading comprehension through flowcharting. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 384–405.
29.
GordonC. J., & PearsonP. D. (1983). The effects of instruction in meta-comprehension and inferencing on children's comprehension abilities (Tech. Rep. No. 277). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
30.
GreenewaldM. J., & RossingR. L. (1986). Short-term and long-term effects of story grammar and self-monitoring training on children's story comprehension. In NilesJ. A., & LalikR. V. (Eds.), Solving problems in literacy: Learners, teachers, and re searchers (35th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, pp. 210–213). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
31.
GuthrieJ. T., Van MeterP., McCannA. D., WigfieldA., BennettL., PoundstoneC. C. (1996). Growth of literacy engagement: Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 306–332.
32.
GuthrieJ. T., & WigfieldA. (Eds.). (1997). Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
33.
GuzzettiB. J., SnyderT. E., GlassG. V., & GamasW. S. (1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: A comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 116–159.
34.
HansenJ (1981). The effects of inference training and practice on young children's reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 391–417.
35.
HansenJ., & PearsonP. D. (1983). An instructional study: Improving the inferential comprehension of good and poor fourth-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 821–829.
36.
HolleyC. D., & DansereauD. F. (1984). Spatial learning strategies: Techniques, applications, and related issues.New York: Academic Press.
37.
IdolL (1987). Group story mapping: A comprehension strategy for both skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 196–205.
38.
KintschW., & Van DijkT. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
39.
KlingerJ. K., & VaughnS. (1999). Promoting reading comprehension, content learning, and English acquisition through Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR). The Reading Teacher, 52, 738–747.
40.
KucanL., & BeckI. L. (1997). Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research: Inquiry, instruction and social interaction. Review of Educational Research, 67, 271–299.
41.
LevinJ. R., & PressleyM. (1981). Improving children's prose comprehension: Selected strategies that seem to succeed. In SantaC. M., & HayesB. L. (Eds.), Children's prose comprehension: Research and practice (pp. 44–71). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
42.
LipsonM. Y., & WixsonK. K. (1991). Assessment and instruction of reading disability: An interactive approach.New York: HarperCollins.
43.
MandlerJ. M. (1978). A code in the mode: The use of a story schema in retrieval. Discourse Processes, 1, 14–35.
44.
McGinleyW. J., & DennerP. R. (1987). Story impressions: A prereading/writing activity. Journal of Reading, 31, 248–253.
45.
McNeilJ., & DonantL. (1982). Summarization strategy for improving reading com prehension. In NilesJ. A., & HarrisL. A. (Eds.), New inquiries in reading research and instruction (pp. 215–219). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
46.
MeichebaumD., & AsnarowJ. (1979). Cognitive behavior modification and metacognitive development: Implications for the classroom. In KendallP., & HollonS. (Eds.), Cognitive behavioral interventions: Theory research and procedures (pp. 11–35). New York: Academic Press.
47.
MeyerB. J. F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effect on memory.Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland Publishing.
48.
MeyerB. J. F., BrandtD. M., & BluthG. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 72–103.
49.
MeyerB. J. F., & RiceG. E. (1984). The structure of text. In PearsonP. D., BarrR., KamilM. L., & MosenthalP. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 319–351). New York: Longman.
50.
MooreP. J. (1988). Reciprocal teaching and reading comprehension: A review. Journal of Research in Reading, 11, 3–14.
51.
MorrowL. M. (1984a). Effects of story retelling on young children's comprehension and sense of story structure. In NilesJ. A., & HarrisL. A. (Eds.), Changing perspectives on re search in reading language processing and instruction (33rd Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, pp. 95–100). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
52.
MorrowL. M. (1984b). Reading stories to young children: Effects of story structure and traditional questioning strategies on comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 16, 273–288.
53.
National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (National Institute of Health Pub. No. 00-4769). Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
54.
NeumanS (1988). Enhancing children's comprehension through previewing. In ReadenceJ., & BaldwinR. S. (Eds.), Dialogues in literacy research (37th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, pp. 219–224). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
55.
NolteR., & SingerH. (1985). Active comprehension: Teaching a process of reading comprehension and its effects on achievement. The Reading Teacher, 39, 24–31.
56.
PalincsarA. S. (1982). Improving the reading comprehension of junior high students through the reciprocal teaching of comprehension-monitoring strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
57.
PalincsarA. S., & BrownA. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
58.
PalincsarA. S., & BrownA. L. (1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text. The Reading Teacher, 39, 771–777.
59.
PalincsarA. S., BrownA. L., & MartinS. M. (1987). Peer interaction in reading com prehension instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22, 231–253.
60.
ParisS. G., CrossD. R., & LipsonM. Y. (1984). Informed strategies for learning: A program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1239–1252.
61.
PearsonP. D. (1981). Asking questions about stories. In Ginn Occasional Papers: Writings in reading and language arts (Monograph No. 15). Lexington, MA: Ginn & Co. Reprinted in A. J. Harris & E. R. Sipay (Eds.), Readings in reading instruction (3rd ed.). New York: Longman, 1984.
62.
PearsonP. D., & FieldingL. (1991). Comprehension instruction. In BarrR., KamilM. L., MosenthalP., & PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 815–860). White Plains, NY: Longman.
63.
PearsonP. D., & GallagherM. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317–344.
PearsonP. D., RoehlerL., DoleJ., & DuffyG. (1992). Developing expertise in reading comprehension. In SamuelsS. J., & FarstrupA. E. (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (2nd ed., pp. 145–199). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
66.
PresseyS. L. A. (1926). A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores—and teaches. School and Society, 23, 373–376.
67.
PressleyM (1998). Comprehension strategies instruction. In OsbornJ., & LehrF. (Eds.), Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 113–133). New York: Guilford.
68.
PressleyM (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In KamilM. L., MosenthalP., PearsonP. D., & BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading re search (Vol. 3, pp. 545–561). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
69.
PressleyM., & AfflerbachP. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
70.
PressleyM., AlmasiJ., SchuderT., BergmanJ., HiteS., El-DinaryP. B. (1994). Transactional instruction of comprehension strategies: The Montgomery County, Maryland, SAIL Program. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 10, 5–19.
71.
PressleyM., El-DinaryP. B., GaskinsI., SchuderT., BergmanJ. L., AlmasiJ. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. The Elementary School Journal, 92, 513–555.
72.
PressleyM., & Wharton-McDonaldR. (1998). The development of literacy, part 4: The need for increased comprehension in upper-elementary grades. In PressleyM. (Ed.), Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching (pp. 192–227). New York: Guilford.
73.
RaphaelT. E., & McKinneyJ. (1983). An examination of fifth- and eighth-grade children's question answering behavior: An instructional study in metacognition. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 67–86.
74.
RaphaelT. E., & PearsonP. D. (1985). Increasing students' awareness of sources of in formation for answering questions. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 217–236.
75.
RaphaelT. E., & WonnacottC. A. (1985). Heightening fourth-grade students' sensitivity to sources of information for answering comprehension questions. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 282–296.
76.
RaphaelT. E., WonnacottC. A., & PearsonP. D. (1983). Increasing students' sensitivity to sources of information: An nstructional study in question-answer relationships (Tech. Rep. No. 284). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
77.
RickardsJ. P. (1976). Type of verbatim question interspersed in text: A new look at the position effect. Journal of Reading Behavior, 8, 37–45.
78.
RosenshineB., & MeisterC. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–530.
79.
RosenshineB., MeisterC., & ChapmanS. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181–221.
80.
SilvenM., & VaurasM. (1992). Improving reading through thinking aloud. Learning and Instruction, 2, 69–88.
81.
SingerH., & DonlanD. (1982). Active comprehension: Problem-solving schema with question generation for comprehension of complex short stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 166–186.
82.
SlaterW. H., GravesM. H., & PicheG. H. (1985). Effects of structural organizers on ninth-grade students' comprehension and recall of four patterns of expository test. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 189–202.
83.
StaufferR. B. (1976). Teaching reading as a thinking process.New York: Harper.
84.
StaufferR. B. (1980). Directing the reading-thinking process.New York: Harper & Row.
85.
SteinN. I., & GlennC. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In FreedleR. O. (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (Vol. 2, pp. 53–120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
86.
TaylorB. M. (1980). Children's memory for expository text after reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 15, 399–411.
87.
TaylorB. M., & BeachR. W. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students' comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 134–146.
88.
YoppR. E. (1988). Questioning and active comprehension. Questioning Exchange, 2, 231–238.
89.
The reference section includes references to many books, chapters, and articles that address specific comprehension strategies and approaches to teaching them. There are also references to several reviews of research.
90.
For more comprehensive discussions of comprehension instruction written specifically for teachers, you might consult any of the following recently published books on the topic: