BartonPaul E., & ColeyR. J. (1996). Captive students: Education and Training in America's prisons.Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
2.
BennerA. D. (2000). The cost of teacher turnover.Austin, TX: Texas Center for Educational Research.
3.
BettsJ. R., RuebenK. S., & DanenbergA. (2000). Equal resources, equal outcomes? The distribution of school resources and student achievement in California.San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
4.
BondH. M. (1934). The education of the Negro in the American social order.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
BoydD., GrossmanP., LankfordH., LoebS., & WyckoffJ. (2005). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1(2), 176–216.
6.
BoydD., LankfordH., LoebS., & WyckoffJ. (2006). The draw of home: How teacher preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(1), 113–132.
7.
BuchbergerF., & BuchbergerI. (2004). Problem solving capacity of a teacher education system as condition of success? An analysis of the “Finnish case.” In BuchbergerF., & BerghammerS. (Eds.), Education policy analysis in a comparative perspective (pp. 222–237). Linz, Austria: Trauner.
8.
ChungR., PecheoneR., & StansburyK. (2005). Survey of participants in the Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
9.
Darling-HammondL. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
Darling-HammondL. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8nl.
11.
Darling-HammondL. (2003). Access to quality teaching: An analysis of inequality in California's public schools. Santa Clara Law Review, 43, 101–239.
12.
Darling-HammondL. (2004a). The color line in American education: Race, resources, and student achievement. W E B. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 1(2), 213–246.
13.
Darling-HammondL., (2004b). Standards, accountability, and school reform. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1047–1085.
14.
Darling-HammondL. (2005). Teaching as a profession: Lessons in teacher preparation and professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(3), 237–240.
15.
Darling-HammondL. (2006). (In collaboration with Fickel, L., Koppich, J., Macdonald, M., Merseth, K., Miller, L., Ruscoe, G., Silvernail, D., Snyder, J., Whitford, B. L., & Zeichner, K.) Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
Darling-HammondL., AncessJ., & OrtS. (2002). Reinventing high school: Outcomes of the Coalition Campus School Project. American Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 639–673.
17.
Darling-HammondL., & BransfordJ. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
Darling-HammondL., HoltzmanD., GatlinS. J., & HeiligJ.V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n42/.
19.
Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (2003). Wanted: A national teacher supply policy for education: The right way to meet the “highly qualified teacher” challenge. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(3). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/vlln33/.
20.
Darling-HammondL., WiseA. E., & KleinS. (1999). A license to teach: Building a profession for 21st century schools.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
DeweyJ (1968). The school and society.Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1900)
22.
Du BoisW. E. B. (1970). The freedom to learn. In FonerP. S. (Ed.), W.E.B. Du Bois Speaks (pp. 230–231). New York: Pathfinder. (Original work published 1949)
23.
EckstromR., & VillegasA. M. (1991). Ability grouping in middle grade mathematics: Process and consequences. Research in Middle Level Education, 15(1), 1–20.
24.
Educational Testing Service. (1991). The state of inequality.Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
25.
ElmoreR., & BurneyD. (1997). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement in Community School District #2, New York City.New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
26.
ElmoreR., & FuhrmanS. (1993). Opportunity to learn and the state role in education. In The debate on opportunity-to-learn standards: Commissioned papers.Washington, D.C.: National Governors Association.
27.
FergusonR. F. (1991, Summer). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28(2), 465–498.
28.
FergusonR. F., & LaddH. F. (1996). How and why money matters: An analysis of Alabama Schools. In LaddH. (Ed.), Holding schools accountable (pp. 265–298). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
29.
FetlerM (1999). High school staff characteristics and mathematics test results. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(9). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v7n9.
30.
FullerE (1998, November). Do properly certified teachers matter? A comparison of elementary school performance on the TAAS in 1997 between schools with high and low percentages of properly certified regular education teachers.Austin, TX: Charles A. Dana Center, University of Texas at Austin.
31.
FullerE (2000, April). Do properly certified teachers matter? Properly certified Algebra teachers and Algebra I achievement inTexas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
32.
GamoranA., & BerendsM. (1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: Synthesis of survey and ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 57, 415–436.
33.
GamoranA., & MareR. (1989). Secondary school tracking and educational inequality: Compensation, reinforcement or neutrality?American Journal of Sociology, 94, 1146–1183.
34.
GemignaniR. J. (1994, October). Juvenile correctional education: A time for change. Update on research. Juvenile Justice Bulletin.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
35.
GideonseH (1993). The governance of teacher education and systemic reform. Educational Policy, 7(4), 395–426.
36.
GoeL (2002). Legislating equity: The distribution of emergency permit teachers in California. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(42). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/vlOn42/.
37.
HanushekE (1996). School resources and achievement in Maryland.Baltimore: Maryland State Department of Education.
HenkeR. R., ChenX., GeisS., & KnepperP. (2000). Progress through the teacher pipeline: 1992–93 College graduates and elementary/secondary school teaching as of 1997 (NCES 2000–152). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics.
40.
HerrnsteinR. J., & MurrayC. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life.New York: Free Press.
41.
HumphreyD. L., KoppichJ., & HoughH. (2005). Sharing the wealth: National Board certified teachers and the students who need them most. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(3). Retrieved December 21, 2005, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n3
42.
IrvineJ. J. (2003). Educating teachers for diversity: Seeing with a cultural eye.New York: Teachers College Press.
43.
JacobB. A. (2002). The impact of high-stakes testing on student achievement: Evidence from Chicago. Working paper, Harvard University.
KlugerR (1976). Simple justice.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
46.
KozolJ (1991). Savage inequalities.New York: Crown.
47.
KozolJ (2005). The shame of a nation.New York: Crown.
48.
LeeV. E., & SmithJ. B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement. Sociology of Education, 68(4), 241–270.
49.
LeeV. E., SmithJ. B., & CroningerR. G. (1995, Fall). Another look at high school restructuring. Issues in Restructuring Schools, 9, 1–10.
50.
McKnightC. C., CrosswhiteF. J., DosseyJ. A., KiferE., SwaffordS. O., TraversK. J. (1987). The underachieving curriculum: Assessing U.S. school mathematics from an international perspective.Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing.
51.
MeierK. J., StuartJ.Jr., & EnglandR. E. (1989). Race, class and education: he politics of second-generation discrimination.Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
52.
MikkolaA (2001). Finnish teacher education and research. In ErixonP., FranbergG., & KallosD. (Eds.), The role of graduate and post-graduate studies and research in teacher education reform policies in the European Union.Umea Universitet, Sweden: European Network on Teacher Education Policies.
53.
MillerJ. G. (1997). African American males in the criminal justice system [Kappan special report]. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, K1–K12.
54.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1994). Digest of education statistics, 1994.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
55.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future.New York: Author.
56.
National Center for Education Statistics. (1998). The condition of education, 1998.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
57.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2001). Common core of data.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
58.
National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America's children.New York: Author.
59.
National Council on Education Standards and Testing. (1992). Raising standards for American education.Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
60.
NewmannF. M. (1996). Authentic achievement: Restructuring schools for intellectual quality.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
61.
NewmannF. M., & WehlageG. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators.Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.
62.
OakesJ (2004). Investigating the claims in Williams v. State of California: An unconstitutional denial of education's basic tools?Teachers College Record, 106(10), 1889–1906.
63.
OakesJ (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
64.
OrfieldG (2001). Schools more separate: Consequences of a decade of resegregation.Cambridge, MA: The Civil Rights Project, Harvard University.
65.
ShieldsP. M., HumphreyD. C., WechslerM. E., RielL. M., Tiffany-MoralesJ., WoodworthK. (2001). The status of the teaching profession, 2001.Santa Cruz, CA: Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning.
66.
SlavinR. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 471–500.
67.
SnyderJ (2000). Knowing children, understanding teaching: The Developmental Teacher Education Program at the University of California-Berkeley (pp. 97–172). In Darling-HammondL. (Ed.), Studies of excellence in teacher education: Preparation at the graduate level.Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education and National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
68.
StraussR. P., & SawyerE.A. (1986). Some new evidence on teacher and student competencies. Economics of Education Review, 5(1), 41–48.
69.
TalbertJ. E. (1990). Teacher tracking: Exacerbating inequalities in the high school.Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary Teaching, Stanford University.
70.
ThompsonC. L., & ZeuliJ. S. (1999). The frame and the tapestry: Standards-based reform and professional development. In Darling-HammondL., & SykesG. (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: A handbook of policy and practice (pp. 341–375). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
71.
TyackD (1974). The one best system.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
72.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1996). Statistical abstract of the United States: 1996 (116th ed.). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Commerce.
73.
WaldM., & LosenD. (2003). Deconstructing the school-to-prison pipeline.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
74.
WasleyP.A., FineM., KingS. P., PowellL. C., HollandN. E., GladdenR. M. (2000). Small schools: Great strides. A study of new small schools in Chicago.New York: Bank Street College of Education.
75.
WilsonS. M., Darling-HammondL., & BerryB. (2001). Teaching policy: Connecticut's long-term efforts to improve teaching and learning.Seattle: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
76.
WiseA. E. (1972). Rich schools, poor schools: The promise of equal educational opportunity.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.