HartP.D., and WinstonD. (2005). Ready for the real world? Americans speak on high school reform.Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
5.
HessF. M. (2003). Refining or retreating? High stakes accountability in the states. In PetersonP.E., and WestM.R. (Eds.), No Child Left Behind? The politics and practice of school accountability (pp. 55–79). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
6.
KerryJ. F. (2004). The promise of opportunity. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(2). Retrieved November 8, 2005 online from http://www.pdkmembers.org/.
7.
McDonnellL. M. (2005). No Child Left Behind and the federal role in education: Evolution or revolution?Peabody Journal of Education, 80(2), 19–38.
8.
MelendezM., and DellerM. (2001, January 28). Bush education plan gets mixed response. Fort Worth Star-Telegram, p. 1.
9.
MillerG., and AliR. (2003, March 18). The fate of our schools. San Francisco Chronicle, p. A25.
10.
NoddingsN (2005, February 23). Rethinking a bad law. Education Week, 24(24), 38.
11.
Office of the White House Press Secretary (2002, January 8). Press release: President signs landmark education bill.
12.
Public Education Network (2004). Learn. Vote. Act.: The public's responsibility for public education.Washington, DC: Public Education Network.
13.
RoseL.C., and GallupA.M. (2005). The 37th Annual Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll of the Public's Attitudes toward the Public Schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 87(1), 41–57.
14.
RudalevigeA (2003). No Child Left Behind. In PetersonP.E., and WestM.R. (Eds.), No Child Left Behind? The politics and practice of school accountability.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 23–54.
15.
ThernstromA.M., and ThernstromS. (2003). No excuses: Closing the racial gap in learning.New York: Simon and Schuster.
16.
UzzellL. A. (2005). No Child Left Behind: The dangers of centralized education policy.Washington, DC: Cato Institute.