Democratic National Committee.2004. Strong at Home, Respected in the World: The Democratic Platform for America.Washington, DC.
2.
FritzbergGregory J.2004. “Revise and Resubmit: A Critical Response to Title One of the No Child Left Behind Act.”Journal of Education, 184(1): 69–87.
3.
FritzbergGregory J.2001. “From Rhetoric to Reality: Opportunity-to-Learn Standards and the Integrity of American Public School Reform.”Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(1): 169–187.
4.
FritzbergGregory J.2000. “Equal Educational Opportunity versus ‘Excellence’: Keeping the Pressure on Goliath.”Educational Foundations, 14(2): 51–71.
5.
HessFrederick M., and FinnChester E.2004. Leaving No Child Behind? Options for Kids in Failing Schools.New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
6.
HessFrederick M.2004. “No Child Left Behind: Mend It, End it, or Let It Work?”Remarks at American Enterprise Institute panel discussion on the No Child Left Behind Act. September 14, 2004.
7.
HoffDavid J.2004. “Accountability Conflicts Vex Schools.”Education Week. March 10, 2004.
8.
MeierDeborah, and WoodGeorge. 2004. Many Children Left Behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is Damaging Our Children and Our Schools.Boston: Beacon Press.
9.
PetersonPaul E., and WestMartin R.2003. No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability.Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
10.
PophamJames W.2004. America's “Failing” Schools: How Parents and Teachers Can Cope with No Child Left Behind.New York: Rutledge Falmer Press.
11.
RobelenErik W.2004. “Kennedy Bill Would Give States, Districts Leeway.”Education Week. September 22, 2004.
12.
RotchfordHerb. 2004. In “The Two Washingtons” column. Curriculum in Context31(1): 2–3.
13.
U.S. Department of Education.2003. 68 Federal Register, 68698–68708. December 9, 2003.