Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper examines the drug policy priorities of the federal government as expressed in the collection of drug strategies produced since 1973. It compares rhetorical emphases with the reported budgeted amounts for Federal programs. The paper finds that, in general, the priorities expressed in the strategies match the relative distribution of supply and demand reduction resources. Recent attempts by the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) to increase spending on drug treatment in the 1990s stand out as an exception, however. The factors accounting for the difficulty ONDCP encounters in realizing its budget goals include (1) the cross-cutting nature of the drug budget, (2) the fact that earlier legislative decisions “front-loaded” the drug budget with law enforcement programs, and (3) the fragmented nature of the Federal budget process. This paper concludes that if legislators want to hold ONDCP responsible for the outcomes of Federal anti-drug programs, they should provide the Office with discretionary control over marginal resources, an authority the Drug Czar currently does not have.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Graham

1997 McCaffrey blasts Pentagon for spending on drug war. November 7, Washington Post A3.

MacCoun

Reuter

Schelling

1996 Assessing alternative drug control regimes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15(3):330–52.

Murphy

P.J.

1994 Keeping Score: The Frailties of the Federal Drug Budget. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

Murphy

P.J.

1996 Why Agencies Can or Cannot Work and Play Well Together: Drug Policy at the State and Federal Level. Unpublished dissertation. Political Science Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Nadelmann

1992 Thinking seriously about alternatives to drug prohibition. Daedalus 121(3):85–132.

Office of National Drug Control Policy. Executive Office of the President 1997a National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Office of National Drug Control Policy. Executive Office of the President 1997b Andean Program Review. (Prepared by the Office of Program, Budget, Research, and Evaluation). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Office of National Drug Control Policy. Executive Office of the President 1996a National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Office of National Drug Control Policy. Executive Office of the President 1996b The National Drug Control Strategy, 1996: Program, Resources, and Evaluation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

10.

Office of National Drug Control Policy. Executive Office of the President 1995 National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

11.

Office of National Drug Control Policy. Executive Office of the President 1994a. National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

12.

Office of National Drug Control Policy. Executive Office of the President 1994b National Drug Control Strategy: Budget Summary. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

13.

Office of National Drug Control Policy. Executive Office of the President 1993 National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

14.

Office of National Drug Control Policy. Executive Office of the President 1992 National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

15.

Office of National Drug Control Policy. Executive Office of the President 1991 National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

16.

Office of National Drug Control Policy. Executive Office of the President 1990 National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

17.

Office of National Drug Control Policy. Executive Office of the President 1989 National Drug Control Strategy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

18.

Reuter

1994 Setting priorities: Budget and program choices for drug control. University of Chicago Legal Forum 1994:145–73.

19.

Reuter

1992 Hawks ascendant: The punitive trend of American drug policy. Daedalus. 121(3):15–38.

20.

Rydell

C.P.

Everingham

S.S.

1994 Controlling Cocaine: Supply vs. Demand Programs. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

21.

Strategy Council on Drug Abuse. Executive Office of the President 1979 Federal Strategy for Drug Abuse and Drug Traffic Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

22.

Strategy Council on Drug Abuse. Executive Office of the President 1976 Federal Strategy for Drug Abuse and Drug Traffic Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

23.

Strategy Council on Drug Abuse. Executive Office of the President 1975 Federal Strategy for Drug Abuse and Drug Traffic Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

24.

Strategy Council on Drug Abuse. Executive Office of the President 1974 Federal Strategy for Drug Abuse and Drug Traffic Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

25.

Strategy Council on Drug Abuse. Executive Office of the President 1973 Federal Strategy for Drug Abuse and Drug Traffic Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

26.

U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary 1989 Confirmation Hearings on Dr. William J. Bennett to be Director of National Drug Control Policy. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

27.

Wildavsky

A. B.

Caiden

1997 The New Politics of the Budgetary Process, Third Edition. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

Matching Rhetoric to Dollars: Twenty-Five Years of Federal Drug Strategies and Drug Budgets

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References