The “hidden population” of illicit drug users has recently attracted increased attention from public health research organizations. This article explores the ways in which the term hidden population is constructed using Foucault's metaphor of the gaze of power. I argue that the construction of the hidden population through the gaze of power is sustained through the rituals and rhetorics of examination of the hidden population. The rituals of examination include quantitative methods that aim to enumerate the hidden population, as well as qualitative methods that aim to provide a realist language for that which has previously been hidden. The rhetoric of examination is the language used to justify exposure of the hidden population. The political implications of this analysis are discussed in terms of a resistance to examination. The “agency” or “capacity for choice” on the part of the researchers and the researched to not take part in the gaze of power, or at least to have more control of their participation, is also discussed, with recent examples from the literature.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AtkinsonP.1990The ethnographic imagination: Textual constructions of reality. London: Routledge.
2.
BeharR.1993Women writing culture: Another telling of the story of American anthropology. Critique of Anthropology13:307–325.
3.
BlumbergH.H.DronfieldB.E.1976Nomination techniques in the study of largely invisible groups: Opiate users not at drug dependence clinics. Social Science and Medicine10:415–422.
4.
BroadheadR.S.HeckathornD.D.1994AIDS prevention outreach among injection drug users: Agency problems and new approaches. Social Problems41:473–495.
5.
CheekJ.RudgeT.1993The power of normalisation: Foucauldian perspectives on contemporary Australian health care practices. Australian Journal of Social Issues28(4):271–284.
6.
CliffordJ.1986Introduction: Partial truths. In Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography, eds. CliffordJ.MarcusG.E., Berkeley: University of California Press.
7.
CotterillP.LetherbyG.1993Weaving stories: Personal autobiographies in feminist research. Sociology27:67–79.
8.
DenzinN.LincolnY.S.1994Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research Ch 1, eds. DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S., London: Sage.
9.
FeldmanH.W.AldrichM.R.1990The role of ethnography in substance abuse research and public policy: Historical precedent and future prospects. In The collection and interpretation of data from hidden populations, ed. LambertE.Y., National Institute on Drug Abuse, Maryland. NIDA Research Monograph 98.
10.
FitzgeraldJ.L.HamiltonM.H.1994An exploratory study of hallucinogen users in Melbourne. Report to the Drug Rehabilitation and Research Fund. Melbourne.
11.
FoucaultM.1973The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception. New York: Vintage Books.
12.
FoucaultM.1977Discipline and punish. London: Tavistock.
13.
FoucaultM.1978The history of sexuality, Volume I: An introduction. London: Penguin.
14.
FoucaultM.1980The politics of health in the eighteenth century. In Power/knowledge, selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977, ed. GordonC.Brighton: Harvester Press.
15.
FoxN.J.1993Postmodernism, sociology and health. Buckingham: Open University Press.
16.
FriedmanS.R.1993Going beyond education to mobilising subcultural change. International Journal of Drug Policy4:91–95.
17.
KaneS.1993National discourse and the dynamics of risk: Ethnography and AIDS intervention. Human Organization. 225–228.
18.
Knorr-CetinaK.D.1981The scientist as a socially situated reasoner: From scientific communities to transcientific fields. In The manufacture of knowledge: An essay on the constructivist and contextual nature of science, ed. Knorr-CetinaK.D., Oxford: Pergamon Press.
19.
KoesterS.K.1994Copping, running, and paraphernalia laws: Contextual variables and needle risk behavior among injection drug users in Denver. Human Organization53:287–295.
20.
KorfD.J.ReijneveldS.A.ToetJ.1994Estimating the number of heroin users: A review of methods and empirical findings from the Netherlands. The International Journal of the Addictions29:1393–1417.
21.
LambertE.Y.1990The collection and interpretation of data from hidden populations. Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse. NIDA Research Monograph 98.
22.
LeeR.L.M.AckermanS.E.1994Farewell to ethnography? Global embourgeoisement and the disprivileging of the narrative. Critique of Anthropology14:339–354.
23.
LincolnY.S.DenzinN.K.1994The fifth moment. In Handbook of qualitative research, eds. DenzinN.K.LincolnY.S., Ch 36. London: Sage.
24.
PoolR.1991Postmodern ethnography. Critique of Anthropology11:309–331.
25.
RabinowP.1986Representations are social facts: Modernity and post-modernity in anthropology. In Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography, eds. CliffordJ.MarcusG., Berkeley: University of California Press.
26.
SingerM.1993Knowledge for use: Anthropology and community-centered substance abuse research. Social Science and Medicine. 37:15–25.
27.
SingerM.IrizarryR.SchensulJ.J.1991Needle access as an AIDS prevention strategy for IV drug users: A research perspective. Human Organization50:142–152.
28.
SpreenM.1992Rare populations, hidden populations, and link-tracing designs: What and why?Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique36:34–58.
29.
SudmanS.SirkenM.G.CowanC.D.1988Sampling rare and elusive populations. Science240:991–996.
30.
van de GoorL.A.M.GarretsenH.F.L.KaplanC.KorfD.SpruitI.P.de ZwartW.M.1994Research methods for illegal drug use in hidden populations: Summary report of a European invited expert meeting. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs26:33–40.
31.
Van MaanenJ.1988Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32.
WardlawG.1991Epidemiology of illegal drug use in Australia. Proceedings of the Second National Drug Indicators Conference. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
33.
WattersJ.K.1993The significance of sampling and understanding hidden populations. Drugs and Society7:13–21.
34.
WattersJ.K.BiernackiP.1989Targeted sampling: Options for the study of hidden populations. Social Problems36:416–430.
35.
WiebelW.W.1990Identifying and gaining access to hidden populations. In The collection and interpretation of data from hidden populations, ed. LambertE.Y., Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse. NIDA Research Monograph 98.
