“Needs assessments” have become increasingly important in guiding resource allocations to publicly funded drug and alcohol treatment programs. Although technical progress in conducting needs assessments in recent years has occurred, virtually all approaches used to identify treatment needs of general and special populations suffer from conceptual, empirical, and inferential problems. This article clarifies the more important problems and offers recommendations about how to improve needs assessments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnglinM. D.MaughT. H.II1992Ensuring success in interventions with drug-using offenders. The Annals of the American Academy521: 66–90.
2.
AnglinM. D.CaulkinsJ. P.HserY. I.1993Prevalence estimation: Policy needs, current status, and future potential. Journal of Drug Issues23:345–60.
3.
ApslerR.HardingW. M.1991Cost-effectiveness analysis of drug abuse treatment: Current status and recommendations for future research. In NIDA drug abuse services research series, No. 1: Background papers on drug abuse financing and services research. DHHS Publication No. ADM 91–17777. Washington, D.C.: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
4.
AquillinoW.LoScuitoL.1989Effects of mode of data collection on the validity of reported drug use. Conference proceedings: Health survey research methods, 253–8. DHHS Publication No. PHS 8-9-3447. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
5.
BellR. A.GoldsmithH. F.LinE.HirzelR. K.SobelS.1982Social indicators for human service systems. Louisville, Ky.: University of Louisville, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
6.
CagleL. T.1984Using social indicators to assess mental health needs: Lessons from a statewide study. Evaluation Review8:389–412.
7.
CagleL. T.BanksS. M.1986The validity of assessing mental health needs with social indicators. Evaluation and Program Planning9:127–42.
8.
CahalanD.1976Some background considerations in estimating needs for state's services dealing with alcohol-related problems. Paper prepared for the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.
9.
CartwrightA.ShawS.SpratelyT.1978The relationships between per capita consumption, drinking patterns and alcohol related problems in a population sample, 1965–1974. Part I: Increased consumption and changes in drinking patterns. British Journal of the Addictions73:237–46.
10.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment1992State assistance development program. Washington, D.C.: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
11.
ChaikenM. R.1989In-prison programs for drug-involved offenders. Washington, D.C.: Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
12.
CliffordD. L.1982A critical view of need assessment in community mental health planning. In Social indicators for human service systems, ed. BellR.A.GoldsmithH.F.LinE.HirzelR.K.SobelS., 18–27. Louisville, Ky:. University of Louisville, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
13.
CollinsJ. J.HubbardR .L.RachalJ. V.CavanaughE .R.CraddockS. G.KristiansenP. L.1982Criminality in a drug treatment sample: Measurement issues and initial findings. Report to the National Institute on Drug Abuse under contract 271-79-3611. Research Triangle Park, N.C.: Research Triangle Institute.
14.
ColonI.CutlerH. S.JonesW.C.1981Alcohol control policies, alcohol consumption and alcoholism. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse8:347–62.
15.
De FleurL.1975Biasing influences on drug arrest records: Implications for deviance research. American Sociological Review40:88–103.
16.
de LintJ.SchmidtW.1971Consumption averages and alcoholism prevalence: A brief review of epidemiological investigations. British Journal of the Addictions2:97–107.
17.
EatonW.W.KesslerL.1985Epidemiologic field methods in psychiatry: The NIMH Epidemiological Catchment Area Program. Orlando, Fla.: Academic Press, Inc.
18.
EbenerP.1992Choosing between telephone and face-to-face interviews. In Resource materials for state needs assessment studies. Washington, D.C.: Office for Treatment Improvement, Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration.
19.
FiorentineR.1993Beyond equity in the delivery of alcohol and drug abuse treatment services. Journal of Drug Issues23(4):559–77.
20.
FiorentineR.AnglinM. D.1993Perceiving need for treatment: A look at eight hypotheses. Manuscript submitted for publication, University of California, Neuropsychiatric Institute, Drug Abuse Research Center, Los Angeles.
21.
FiorentineR.AttarY.1992Evaluation of delivery of alcohol and drug services to target populations. Final Report ADP-RFP-91-2. Los Angeles: University of California, Neuropsychiatric Institute, Drug Abuse Research Center.
22.
FurstC. J.BeckmanL. J.1981Alcohol related morality and alcohol consumption statistics: Stability of estimates for small areas. Journal of Studies on Alcohol42:57–63.
23.
GfroererJ. C.HughesA. L.1991The feasibility of collecting drug abuse data by telephone. Public Health Reports106:384–93.
24.
GrayL. C.GoldsmithH. F.LivieratosB. B.DupeyH. G.1983Individual and contextual social status contribution to psychological well-being. Sociology and Social Review68:79–95.
25.
HagedornH.1977A manual on state mental health planning. National Institute of Mental Health DHEW Publication No. ADM 77–273. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
26.
HoughR.LandsverkJ.KarnoM.BurnamA.TimbersD.EscobarJ.RegierD.1987Utilization of health and mental health services by Los Angeles Mexican-Americans and non-Hispanic Whites. Archives of General Psychiatry44:702–9.
27.
HserY. I.1992Prevalence estimation: Summary of common problems and practical solutions. Journal of Drug Issues23:335–40.
28.
HserY. I.AnglinM. D.1992Multimethod approaches for estimating numbers of illicit drug users. Needs Assessment Studies, the Office for Treatment Improvement.
29.
HserY. I.AnglinM. D.WickensT. D.BrechtM.HomerJ.1992Techniques for the estimation of illicit drug-use prevalence: An overview of relevant issues. National Institute of Justice Research Report no. NCJ 133786. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
30.
JonesC. L.LopezR.1990Drug abuse and pregnancy. In New perspectives on prenatal care, ed. MerkatzI.R.ThompsonJ.T., 273–318. New York:Elsevier.
31.
KandelD. B.MaloffD. R.1983Commonalities in drug use: A sociological perspective. In Commonalities in substance abuse and habitual behavior, ed. LevisonP.K.GersteinR.R.MaloffD.R., Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
32.
KimmelW.A.1990Alternative approaches to the assessment of need, demand and problems for the development and improvement of alcohol and drug treatment services: Overview and practical guidance. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Treatment Improvement, Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration.
33.
LiuW.YuE.1985Ethnicity, mental health, and the urban delivery system. In Urban ethnicity in the United States: New immigrants and old minorities, ed. MaldonadoL.MooreJ., 211–48. Beverly Hills, Calif.:Sage Publications.
34.
LongshoreD.HsiehS.AnglinM. D.AnnonK.1992Ethnic patterns in drug abuse treatment utilization. Journal of Mental Health Administration19:268–77.
35.
McAuliffeW. E.1990Health care policy issues in the drug abuser treatment field. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law15:357–85.
36.
McBrideD. C.McCoyC. B.1985The methodologies of performing needs assessments of drug use. Forecasting Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office
37.
MorgensternH, 1982Uses of ecologic analysis in epidemiologic research. American Journal of Public Health72:1336–44.
38.
National Institute on Drug Abuse1991National household survey on drug abuse: Main findings 1990. Rockville, Md.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
39.
PophamR. E.SchmidtW.W.de LintJ.1975The prevention of alcoholism: Epidemiological studies of the effects of government control measures. British Journal of the Addictions70:125–44.
40.
RobinsonW. S.1950Ecological correlation and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review15:351–7.
41.
RosenB. M.LawrenceL.GoldsmithH. F.WindleC. D.ShambaughJ. P.1975Mental health demographic profile system description: Purpose, contents and exemplar of uses. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
42.
RouseB. A.KozelN. J.RichardsL. G., eds. 1985Self-report methods of estimating drug abuse: Meeting current challenges to validity. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series 57. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
43.
SingleE.KandelK.JohnsonB.1975The reliability and validity of drug use responses in a large scale longitudinal survey. Journal of Drug Issues5:426–43.
44.
SlatinG. T.1969Ecological analysis of delinquency: Aggregation effects. American Sociological Review34:894–907.
45.
StrueningE. L.1975Social area analysis as a method of evaluation, In Handbook of evaluation research, ed. StrueningE.L.GuttentagM., vol. 1, 519–36. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.
46.
SueS.1977Community mental health services to minority groups: Some optimism, some pessimism. American Psychologist32:616–24.
47.
TyebjeeT. T.1979Telephone survey methods: The state of the art. Journal of Market Research43:68–78.
48.
U.S. Bureau of the Census1982Statistical abstract of the United States: 1982–83. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
49.
U.S. Congress. Senate Committee on the Judiciary1990Hard-core cocaine addictions: Measuring — and fighting — the epidemic. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
50.
U.S. Department of Justice1989Drug use forecasting annual report: Drugs and crime. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice.
51.
WarheitG .J.BellR. A. R. A.SchwabJ. J.1977Needs assessment approaches: Concepts and methods. Department of Health Education and Welfare Publication no. ADM 77–472. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
52.
WarheitG. J.BuhlJ. M.BellR. A.1978A critique of social indicators analysis and key informant surveys as needs assessment methods. Evaluation and Program Planning1:239–47.
53.
WellingtonS.1982A timely approach to needs assessment and mental health planning. In Social indicators for human service systems, ed. BellR.A.GoldsmithH.F.LinE.HirzelR.K.SobelS., 8–14. Louisville, Ky.:University of Louisville, School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
54.
WestonI.IvinsB.ZuckermanB.JonesC.LopezR.1989Drug exposed babies: Research and clinical issues. Zero to Three: Bulletin of the National Center for Clinical Infant Programs9:1–7.
55.
WhiteheadP. C.HarveyC.1974Explaining alcoholism: An empirical test and reformulation. Journal of Health and Social Behavior15:57–65.
56.
WindleC.RosenB. M.GoldsmithH. F.ShambaughJ. P.1975A demographic system for comparative assessment of “needs” for mental health services. Evaluation2:73–6.
57.
YoungF. W.YoungR. C.1961Key informant reliability in rural Mexican villages. Human Organization20:141–3.
58.
ZdepS. M.RhodesI. N.SchwarzR. M.KilkennyM. J.1979The validity of the randomized response technique. Public Opinion Quarterly43:544–9.
