The process of evaluating the Australian National Campaign Against Drug Abuse (NCADA) is described. The campaign consists of activities in education, treatment, research and legislative controls. Because of the complex nature of the campaign, a range of evaluation activities was used, including activity monitoring, process and outcome evaluations and the establishment of an expert task force to undertake an assessment of the overall impact of the first three years of the campaign. The conduct of the task force's approach is described and some positive and negative lessons are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlewettN.1987National Campaign Against Drug Abuse: Assumption, Arguments and Aspirations, NCADA Monograph Series No. 1. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
2.
CarrollT.LoyJ.1988The Drug Offensive — A review of its approach and progress from April 1986 to September 1988. Australian Drug and Alcohol Review7:487–498.
3.
Commonwealth Department of Finance and Australian Public Service Board1987Evaluating Government Programs: Financial Management Improvement Program. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
4.
Commonwealth Department of Health1985National Campaign Against Drug Abuse: Campaign Document. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing.
5.
HawkeR.1984Australian Labor Party Policy Speech. Sydney.
6.
HeatherN.TebbuttJ. (eds.) 1989The Effectiveness of Treatment for Drug and Alcohol Problems: An Overview. NCADA Monograph Series No. 11. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
7.
LapsleyH.CollinsD.1991Economic Costs of Drug Abuse in Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Community Services and Health.
8.
LowinsonJ.H.RuizP.LangrodJ.MartinezH.L.1981Consumer input in the evaluation of drug addiction services. The International Journal of the Addictions16(1): 165–171.
9.
McAllisterI.MooreR.1988Drugs and Public Opinion: The Sociology of Drug Use in Australia. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Community Services and Health.
10.
McDermottF.PyettP.HamiltonM.1991Evaluate Yourself: A Handbook for Alcohol and Other Drug Treatment Agencies. Canberra: National Campaign Against Drug Abuse.
11.
McDonaldD.1988A review of the processes of evaluating Australia's National Campaign Against Drug Abuse. In Proceedings of a Satellite Conference to the WHO Healthy Public Policy Conference — “A Case Study of the National Campaign Against Drug Abuse: The Australian Experience,” 24–31 March 1988. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Health.
12.
McDonaldD.BrownH.HamiltonM.MillerM.StephensonE.1988Australia drug policies 1988 and beyond — A drugs campaign evaluation. Australian Drug and Alcohol Review7:499–505.
13.
MarkM.M.ShotlandR.L.1985Stakeholder-based evaluation and value judgements. Evaluation Review9(5):605–626.
14.
MooreR.MakkaiT.McAllisterI.1988Perceptions and Patterns of Drug Use: Changes Since the Drug Offensive. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Community Services and Health.
15.
National Campaign Against Drug Abuse1989The National Campaign Against Drug Abuse, 1985–88: Evaluation and Future Directions. NCADA Monograph Series No. 12. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
16.
ReillyC.HomelP.1988Strategies for the Prevention of Drug and Alcohol Problems. Sydney: New South Wales Directorate of the Drug Offensive, In-House Report Series A88/4.
17.
Senate Standing Committee on Social Welfare1979Through a Glass, Darkly: Evaluation In Australian Health and Welfare Services. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Services.
