The broad context of this paper is the concomitants of ‘normalization’ of deviants. The field work focuses on current and former skid row inebriates.
“Normalization” is not a prominent topic in sociological work on deviance, social control and social problems. A review of specialized literature on spontaneous recovery or intervention outcomes among several forms of deviance lead to hypotheses in six general areas: socio-economic background, degree of involvement in a deviant sub-culture, ‘negative‘ experiences accompanying deviance, stakes in conformity, formal interventions and aging.
The field research involved retrospective accounts of 346 former and current skid row inebriates selected through contact with skid row informants and over 30 treatment and care-taker facilities. Scales were developed to measure each of the hypotheses. Stakes in conformity was found to be highly correlated with recovery in the multiple discriminant analysis. The explanatory power was increased by inclusion of the element of rewards for initiating normalization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnnisH. M.GiesbrechtN.OgborneA.SmartR. G.1976Task Force II: Report on the Operation and Effectiveness of the Ontario Detoxication System, Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation of Ontario
2.
ArmorD. J.PolichJ. M.StambulH. B.1976Alcoholism and Treatment. Prepared for the U.S. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Santa Monica, California: Rand Corporation
BaekelandF.LundwallL.KissinB.1975“Methods for the treatment of chronic alcoholism: A critical appraisal,” in GibbinsR. J.IsraelY.KalantH.PophamR. E.SchmidtW.SmartR. G. (eds.), Research Advances in Alcohol and Drug Problems, Volume II. New York: John Wiley and Sons
5.
BerginA. E.1971“The evaluation of therapeutic outcomes,” in BerginA. E.GarfieldS. L. (eds.), Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behaviour Change: An Empirical Analysis. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc
6.
BriarS.PiliavinI.1965“Delinquency, situational inducements and commitments to conformity.”Social Problems13: 41–51
7.
BrillL.1972The De-addiction Process: Studies in the De-Addition of Confirmed Heroin Addicts. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas
8.
BullingtonB.MunnsJ. G.GeissG.1969“Purchase of conformity: Ex-narcotic addicts among the burgeoisie.”Social Problems16: 276–286
9.
ChambersC. D.BabstD. V.WarnerA.1973“Characteristics of patient retention/attrition,” in ChambersC. D.BrillL. (eds.), Methadone: Experiences and Issues. New York: Behavioral Publications
10.
CostelloR. M.1975“Alcoholism treatment and education: In search of methods.”International Journal of Addictions10: 251–275
11.
DavisF.1956“Definitions of time and recovery in paralytic polio convalescence.”American Journal of Sociology61: 582–587
12.
DelamaterJ.1968“On the nature of deviance.”Social Forces46: 445–455
EysenckH. J.1961“The effects of psychotherapy,” in EysenckH. J. (ed.), Handbook of Abnormal Psychology. New York: Basic Books
15.
GiesbrechtN. A.1980“Changes in the drinking patterns of skid row alcoholics: A study of the sociology of the normalization of deviants.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Toronto
16.
GiffenP. J., (Chairman) 1969Report of the Task Force on Detoxication Planning. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation of Ontario
17.
GlaserD.1969The Effectiveness of a Prison and Parole System (Revised Edition). Indianapolis, Indiana: Bobbs-Merrill
18.
GoffmanE.1963Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall
19.
GoodwinD. W.CraneJ. B.GuzeB.1971“Felons who drink: An 8-year follow-up,”Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol32: 136–147
20.
HaslamP.1964“The maturation process in addiction,”Canadian Journal of Corrections6: 28–30
21.
HoodR.SparksR.1970Key Issues in Criminology. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Book Co
22.
KleckaW. R.1975“Discriminant Analysis,” in NieN. H.HullC. H.JenkinsJ. G.SteinbrennerK.BentD. H.SPSS—Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill
23.
LabovitzS.1972“Statistical usage in sociology: Sacred cows and ritual.”Sociological Methods and Research1: 13–37
24.
LoflandJ.1969Deviance and Identity. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall
25.
LuborskyL.ChandlerM.AuerbachA. H.CohenJ.BachrachH. M.1971“Factors influencing the outcome of psychotherapy: A review of quantitative research.”Psychological Bulletin75: 145–185
26.
MartinsonR.1971The Treatment Evaluation Survey. New York: Office of Criminal Control Planning of the State of New York
27.
MatzaD.1964Delinquency and Drift. New York: John Wiley and Sons
28.
MeltzoffJ.KornreichM.1970Research in Psychotherapy. New York: Atherton Press, Inc
29.
O'DonnellJ. A.1969Narcotic Addicts in Kentucky. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare
30.
OgborneA. C.1978“Patient characteristics as predictors of treatment outcomes for alcohol and drug abusers,” in IsraelY.GlaserF. B.KalantH.PophamR. E.SchmidtW.SmartR. G. (eds.), Research Advances in Alcohol and Drug Problems, Volume 4. New York: Plenum Press
31.
OkiG.1970“Chronic Drunkenness offender: Drinking history.”Addiction Research Foundation of Ontario, Substudy
32.
PattisonE. M.CoeR.DoerrH. O.“Population variation among alcoholism treatment facilities.”International Journal of Addictions8: 199–229
33.
RayM. B.1961“The cycle of abstinence and relapse among heroin addicts.”Social Problems9: 132–140
34.
ReedJ. P.ReedR. S.1973“Status, images and consequences: Once a criminal always a criminal.”Sociology and Social Research57: 460–472
35.
RobinsonJ.SmithG.1971“The effectiveness of correctional programs,”Crime and Delinquency17: 67–80
36.
RogersJ. W.BuffaloM. D.1974“Fighting back: Nine modes of adaptation to a deviant label.”Social Problems22: 101–118
37.
RoweA. R.TittleC. R.1977“Life cycle changes and criminal propensity.”Sociological Quarterly18: 223–236
38.
RubingtonE.1968“The bottle gang.”Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol29: 943–955
39.
RubingtonE.1971“The changing skid row scene.”Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol32: 123–135
40.
RushingW. A.1971Deviant Behavior and Social Process. Santa Monica, California: Rand Corporation
41.
SobellM. B.SobellL. C.1975“The need for realism, relevance and operational assumptions in the study of substance dependence,” in CappellH. D.LeblancA. E. (eds.) Biological and Behavioural Approaches to Drug Dependence. Toronto: Alcoholism and Drug Addiction Research Foundation of Ontario
42.
StebbinsR. A.1971Commitment to Deviance. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood
43.
SykesG. M.MatzaD.1957“Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency.”American Sociological Review22: 664–670
44.
TobyM.EdwardsR. V.1957“Social disorganization and stakes in conformity: Complementary factors in the predatory behavior of young hoodlums.”Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science48: 12–17
45.
VaillantG. E.1966“A twelve-year follow-up of New York narcotic addicts: IV. Some characteristics and determinants of abstinence.”American Journal of Psychiatry23: 573–585
46.
WaldorfD.1970“Life without heroin: Some social adjustments during long-term periods of voluntary abstention.”Social Problems18: 228–243
47.
WaldorfD.1973Careers in Dope. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall
48.
WaldorfD.1981“Natural recovery from opiate addiction: Some social-psychological processes of untreated recovery.”Berkeley California: Social Networks Project, Pacific Institute for Research Education
49.
WallerI.1974Men Released from Prison. Toronto: University of Toronto Press
50.
WarrenC. A. B.1974“The use of stigmatizing social labels in conventionalizing deviant behavior.”Sociology and Social Research58: 303–311
51.
WinickC.1962“Maturing out of narcotic addiction.”Bulletin on Narcotics14: 1–7
52.
WisemanJ. P.1970Stations of the Lost: The Treatment of Skid Row Alcoholics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall
