Data on 23 halfway houses for alcoholics are analyzed to explore the relationships of years of program operation and average staff tenure (or average length of employment at the halfway house) with each other and with: (1) the sex-composition of the halfway house clientele; (2) the employment rate of halfway house clients; and (3) the average length of time clients remain in the halfway house. Results indicate that older halfway houses tend to restrict admissions to “males only”; that a more senior staff influences clients to remain in the facility for lengthier terms of residence; and that clients in houses with a larger proportion of males remain in the facility for shorter terms of residence. The discussion focuses on implications of the findings for organizational stability and survival and identifies directions for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmorDavidJ.PolichJ. MichaelHarrietB. Stambul1978Alcoholism and Treatment. New York: Wiley–Interscience.
2.
BakerTimothyB.1972“Halfway houses for alcoholics: Shelters or shackles.”International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 18 (Autumn): 201–211.
3.
BakerTimothyB.MarkB. SobellSobellL.C.DaleS. Cannon1976“Halfway houses for alcoholics: A review, analysis, and comparison with other halfway house facilities.”International Journal of Social Psychiatry22 (Summer): 130–139.
4.
BrometE.MoosR.BlissF.WuthmannC.1977“Posttreatment functioning of alcoholic patients: Its relation to program participation.”Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology45: 829–842.
5.
BuckleyWalter1967Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice–Hall.
6.
CahnSidney1969“Alcoholism in halfway houses: Relationships to other programs and facilities.”Social Work14: 50–60.
7.
1970The Treatment of Alcoholics: An Evaluative Study. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
ClarkPeter1979“Events and structures: Towards an explanation of time–reckoning in organizations.”Paper presented at the Work Group on Organizational Structure and Time, sponsored by the Social Science Research Council and European Group of Organizational Studies, University of Aston Management Centre, Birmingham, England (April).
9.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L.1966The Discovery of Grounded Theory, Chicago: Adline.
10.
GlissonCharlesA.PatriciaY. Martin1980“Productivity and efficiency as related to size, age, and structure in human service organizations.”Academy of Management Journal23 (March): 21–37.
11.
HeydebrandWolf1973Hospital Bureaucracy: A Comparative Study of Organizations. New York: Dunellen.
12.
KimberlyJohnR.1975“Classification and organizational analysis: The case of rehabilitation organizations.”Western Sociological Review6: 27–60.
13.
1976“Issues in the design of longitudinal organizational research.”Sociological Methods and Research4 (February): 321–47.
14.
MartinPatriciaY.1979“Clients' characteristics and the expectations of staff in halfway houses for alcoholics.”Journal of Studies on Alcohol40 (March): 211–21.
15.
1981“Program characteristics and residents' length of stay in alcoholism halfway houses.”International Journal of the Addictions16 (April): Forthcoming.
16.
MartinPatriciaY.SegalBrian1977“Bureaucracy, size, and staff expectations for client independence in halfway houses.”Journal of Health and Social Behavior18 (December): 376–90.
17.
National Institute of Mental Health1975Halfway Houses Serving the Mentally Ill and Alcoholics, United States, 1973. DHEW Publ. No. ADM-76-264. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
18.
OgborneA. C.CookG. M.1977“Discharge patterns of residents from halfway houses for male alcoholics.”Drug and Alcohol Dependence2: 73–79.
19.
OgborneA. C.WigginsT.R.I.1978Factors associated with retention and successful discharge from alcoholism halfway houses. Addiction Research Foundation Substudy No. 939 (Ontario, Canada).
20.
OgborneA. C.AnnisH. M.Sanchez–CraigM.1978Report of the Task Force on Halfway Houses. Addiction Research Foundation (Toronto, Ontario, Canada).
21.
OttS.OrfordJ.1978Not Quite Like Home: Small Hostels for Alcoholics and Others. New York and London: Wiley–Interscience.
RochteF. C.1977“An organizational typology of treatment facilities of the physically handicapped.”The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation58 (March): 207–13.
24.
RubingtonEarl1979“Halfway houses and treatment outcomes: A relationship between institutional atmosphere and therapeutic effectiveness.”Journal of Studies on Alcohol40: 419–27.
25.
SchmidtStuartA.1977“Client–oriented evaluation of public agency effectiveness.”Administration and Society8 (February): 403–22.
26.
SegalBrian1971A Passage to Health: A Comparative Study of Psychiatric Halfway Houses. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pittsburgh.
27.
StarbuckWilliam1965“Organizational growth and development.” Pp. 451–533 In JamesG. March ed., Handbook of Organizations. Chicago: Rand–McNally.
28.
WielandGeorgeF.1974“The contributions of organizational sociology to the practice of management: A book review essay.”Academy of Management Journal17 (2): 318–33.
29.
WilmotR.OgborneA. C.1977“Conflicts and contradictions in a halfway house for alcoholics: Inside the black box.”Journal of Drug Issues7: 151–62.
