Treating Drug and Alcohol Abusers in the Same Facilities: Process and Implications

Abstract

This paper describes the characteristics of separate and consolidated drug/alcohol clinics and evaluates the treatment of their clients. Consolidation refers to the existence of an explicit policy of treating alcoholics in drug abuse clinics; treatment refers both to the treatments made available to the clients and to the outcome of these treatments. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in client level treatment process between separate and consolidated clinic level drug/alcohol treatment strategies. A total of 31,964 subjects from 267 drug abuse treatment facilities are studied by means of two way analysis of variance. The primary difference between separate and consolidated clinics is in the availability of services—clinics espousing a policy of treating both drug and alcohol subjects tend to offer a wider range of services than do clinics without such a policy. The data confirm the null hypothesis. Initial differences between the two types of clinics are explained by differences in characteristics—especially variations in the availability of services. The implications of these findings for administration and treatment are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews

F. M.

1973 “Multiple Classification Analysis: A report on a Computer Program for Multiple Regression Using Categorical Predictors,” Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Cohen

Sidney

1978 “The Effects of Combined Alcohol-Drug Abuse on Human Behavior.” A report prepared for Joint Drug-Alcohol Collaborative Project, Services Research Branch, Division of Resource Development, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland.

Greene

Bradford T.

1977 “Dimensions of Drug Abuse Treatment Clinics in United States.” Unpublished paper, February.

Greene

Bradford T.

1978a “A Comparison of Separate and Combined Drug/Alcohol Treatment Strategies.” Unpublished paper, May.

Greene

Bradford T.

1978b “Drug-Alcohol Abuse Patterns as Affected by Employment Experience,” A report prepared for Joint Drug-Alcohol Collaborative Project, Services Research Branch, Division of Resource Development, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland.

Greene

Bradford T.

1978

“Effects of Client Characteristics on Admission Activity in U.S. Federally Funded Drug Abuse Treatment Programs.”

International Journal of the Addictions, Vol. 13, No. 5.

Greene

Bradford T.

Jay

Volkert J.

Ryser

Paul E.

1977 “The Impact of Combined Drug-Alcohol Treatment on the Administration of Federal Drug Abuse Programs.” A paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the National Capital Area Political Science Association, March.

Kissen

1973 “Which Addicts and Alcoholics Should be Treated Together and Which Separately”? Proceedings of the Sixth American Eagleville Conference, 1973, Eagleville, Pennsylvania, Eagleville Conference.

National Association of State Drug Abuse Coordinators 1978 A telephone conversation with Gail Simmons, May 15.

10.

National Institute on Drug Abuse 1975 Client Oriented Acquisition Process: Historical Client File. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse, Division of Scientific and Program Information.

11.

National Institute on Drug Abuse 1978 Final Report, Joint Drug Abuse Alcohol Collaborative Project. Rockville, Maryland: Richard Katon Associates, March 1.

12.

National Institute on Drug Abuse 1977 National Drug/Alcohol Collaborative Project (NDACP), January, 1977. Carroll

Jerome

. ed. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

13.

National Institute on Drug Abuse 1976a The National Drug Abuse Treatment Utilization Survey: Period Prevalence, March 1, 1976 to March 31, 1976. A report prepared for Division of Scientific and Program Information. Rockville, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse, August 16.

14.

National Institute on Drug Abuse 1976b Statistical Series: Quarterly Report, January-March, 1976. Series 4. DHEW Publication No. (ADM) 76–370. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

15.

Ottenberg

D. J.

Rosen

1971

“Merging the Treatment of Drug Addicts into an Existing Program for Alcoholism.”

Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 32: 94–103.

16.

Sells

S. B.

1977 “Summary Charts for Briefing of NIDA Staff on Cohort 1–2: Follow-up Study, DARP Research Program on Effectiveness of Drug Abuse Treatment, Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University, Ft. Worth, Texas.

17.

Stimmel

Barry

1978 “Methadone Maintenance and Alcohol Use.” A report prepared for Joint Drug-Alcohol Collaborative Project, Services Research Branch, Division of Resource Development, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland.

18.

Volkert

J. Jay

1977 “Policy Issues in the Merger of Drug and Alcohol Administrations.” Unpublished paper prepared for Richard Katon and Associates, Rockville, Maryland.