This paper explores the vital role of unions in job-based alcoholism programs, pointing out the inevitable involvement of unions where they are duly authorized as legitimate representatives of employees. Consequently it is essential that unions be realistically involved in job-based policies and programs. This, however, has typically not been the case. On the other hand, this state of affairs is rapidly changing, and the present paper examines the problems and payoffs involved in union-management cooperation and joint effort. Specific attention is paid to the concern of labor unions about the strategy of constructive confrontation, indicating how this strategy must be adapted to the legitimate concerns of unions.
In addition union initiated and collectively bargained programs are examined, and the role of arbitration and the labor arbitrator is analyzed, pointing out the possibility that the psychodynamics of alcoholism may lead to the employee playing his grievance rights against management. In this connection some of the concerns of numerous members of the labor movement about the “broadbrush” pro grams are listed; and the relationship between unions and the treatment community is described. Finally a review of extant data about the involvement of labor unions is presented, pointing out its scarcity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Airline and Aerospace Workers of America — Machinists1974Manual for Supervisors and Foremen for Using Alcohol Policy.
2.
American Federation of Postal Workers1975“Alcoholism as Treatable.”The American Postal Work5(No. 1): 14–21.
3.
BartoshJack1967American Unions: Structure, Government and Politics. New York: Random House.
4.
BelascoJamesHarrisonM. TriceRitzerGeorge1969“Role of Unions in Industrial Alcoholism Programs.”Addictions16:13–30.
5.
BokDerekDunlopJohn1970Labor and the American Community. New York: Simon Schuster.
6.
CarneyJohn1976Personal Correspondence.
7.
CoserLewis1956The Social Functions of Conflict. New York: Free Press.
8.
DaleErnest1949“Increasing Productivity through Labor-Management Cooperation.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review3:33–44.
9.
HabbeSteven1968Company Controls for Drinking Problems. New York: National Industrial Conference Board.
10.
HolmesDouglas1962New York City Alcoholism Study: A Report. New York: National Council on Alcoholism.
11.
HolmesDouglas1963Report of New York City Alcoholism Project. Mimeographed. New York: National Council on Alcoholism.
12.
HuntRichardHarrisonM. TriceJaniceM. Beyer1976“Impact of Federal Unions on Supervisory Decisions to Use an Alcoholism Policy.”Working Paper No. 3, Program on Alcoholism and Occupational Health, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University.
13.
JonesDallasL.1970“Ramifications of Back-Pay Awards in Suspension and Discharge Cases.”Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Meeting, National Academy of Arbitrators. Washington: Bureau of National Affairs, p. 167.
14.
McKermottThomasNewhanesThomas1971“Discharge-Reinstatement: What Happens Thereafter?”Industrial and Labor Relations Review24:526–531.
15.
MinerJohnMinerMary1973Personnel and Industrial Relations, Second Edition. New York: The MacMillan Company.
16.
MorrisJoseph1972“The Unions Look at Alcohol and Drug Dependency.”International Labor Review106:355–346.
17.
National Council on Alcoholism1973Labor-Management Approach to Employee Alcoholism Programs. New York: Private Printing.
18.
PerlisLeo1972Labor and Alcoholism. New York: National Council on Alcoholism and AFL-CIO Community Services Branch.
19.
PerlisLeo1973a“The Human Equation: An Interview with Leo Perlis.”AFL-CIO Department of Community Services. Alcohol Health and Research World, Fall, pp. 17–21.
20.
PerlisLeo1973b“Labor's Role in the Prevention and Treatment of Alcoholism.”Address given at Fourth Annual Alcohol Conference, sponsored by N.I.A.A.A., June 13, 1974. Mimeographed.
21.
PerlmanSelig1949A Theory of the Labor Movement. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.
22.
RomanPaulHarrisonM. Trice1976“Alcohol Abuse and Work Organizations,” in KissinBenjaminBegleiterHenri (Eds.), The Social Aspects of Alcoholism. New York: Plenum Press, 473–498.
23.
RossArthus1957“The Arbitration of Discharge Cases: What Happens After Reinstatement?”Critical Issues in Labor Arbitration, Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting, National Academy of Arbitrators. Washington: Bureau of National Affairs, p. 23.
24.
SchrammCarl1974“The Development of Language Pertaining to Alcoholism.”Report No. 9, Employee Health Program Working Papers. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University. Mimeographed.
25.
SlichterSumnerH.JamesJ. HealthLivernashE. R.1960The Impact of Collective Bargaining on Management. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
26.
SlotkinElizabethLevyLeoWetmoreEdwinRunkFerdinand1971Mental Health Related Activities of Companies and Unions. New York: Behavioral Publications.
27.
Smithers Foundation1970The Key Role of Labor in Employee Alcoholism Programs. New York: Plenum Press.
28.
SommersGerald1975“Alcohol and Just Cause for Discharge.”Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Meeting, National Academy of Arbitrators. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs, p. 131.
29.
SutermeisterMarvin1963People and Productivity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
30.
TriceHarrisonM.1962Alcoholism in Industry: Modern Procedures. New York: Christopher D. Smithers Foundation.
31.
TriceHarrisonM.1965a“Alcoholic Employees: A Comparison of Psychotic, Neurotic and ‘Normal’ Personnel.”Journal of Occupational Medicine7:94–99.
32.
TriceHarrisonM.1965b“Reaction of Supervisors to Emotionally Disturbed Employees.”Journal of Occupational Medicine7:177–183.
33.
TriceHarrisonM.1966“The Alcoholic Employee and His Supervisor.” in PophamR. E. (Ed.), Alcohol and Alcoholism, Papers presented at the International Symposium in Memory of E. M. Jellinek.Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 338–346.
34.
TriceHarrisonM.BelascoJames1966“Emotional Health and Employer Responsibility.”Bulletin No. 57. Ithaca, New York: New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, 40 pages.
35.
TriceHarrisonM.JancieM. Beyer1977“Differential Use of an Alcoholism Policy in Federal Organizations by Skill Level of Employees,” in SchrammCarl (Ed.), Employee Assistance and Alcoholism Programs in American Industry. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press: Forthcoming.
36.
TriceHarrisonM.RomanPaul1972Spirits and Demons at Work: Alcohol and Other Drugs on the Job. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
37.
TuckerJerry1974“A Worker-Oriented Alcoholism and Troubled Employee's Program: A Union Approach.”Industrial Gerontology, Fall, pp. 20–23.
38.
U.S. Civil Service Commission1974Union Recognition in the Federal Goverment. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
39.
U.S. Civil Service Commission1975Internal Evaluation of Agency Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Programs. Bulletin No. 792-15. Washington, D.C.
40.
U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare1973“Occupational Alcoholism: Some Problems and Some Solutions.”Publication No. (hsm) 73–9060, pp. 10–14.
41.
WarkovSeymourBaconSeldonArthurC. Hawkins1965“Social Correlates of Industrial Problem Drinking.”Journal of Studies on Problem Drinking26:58–81.
42.
WeinerHuman1967“Labor-Management Relations and Mental Health.” in McLeanAlan (Ed.), To Work Is Human. New York: MacMillan, pp. 193–202.
43.
WnorowskiA. K.1970“Once You Have an Agreement (How to Avoid Grievances).”Personnel Journal49:843–846.
44.
WrichJames1974The Employee Assistance Program. Center City, Minnesota: The Hazelden Foundation.
