Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Moral psychology research has often overlooked the perspectives of individuals grappling with addiction due to social and methodological biases. To address this, we developed a research tool exploring their moral reasoning across different stages of use and recovery. Phase 1 involved exploratory interviews with three men, shaping our study protocol, including the Population Adapted Moral Dilemma Interview and a semi-structured interview. Phase 2 included 31 men with diverse educational backgrounds and addiction types, spanning active use to 44 years of abstinence. Findings reveal maladaptive moral reasoning frameworks, shaped by deterministic, rigid deontological, and termed “Candidian” tendencies during active addiction. In long-term recovery, participants employ various adaptive strategies to foster autonomous moral decision-making. The study suggests that an unalienating, tailored, and holistic methodological approach is productive in pursuing recovery-oriented knowledge on marginalized populations. Along with recovery, the authoritative and obligative approach is neglected, while moral development is achieved through self-compassionate practicality.

Keywords

addiction recovery moral psychology self-compassion moral judgment moral reasoning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

L. S.

(2010). Sampling “hard to reach” populations in qualitative research: The case of incarcerated youth. Qualitative Social Work, 9(4), 536–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010367821

Ackerman

Thompson

V. A.

(2017). Meta-reasoning: Monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(8), 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.05.004

Alterman

A. I.

Druley

K. A.

Connolly

Bush

(1978). A comparison of moral reasoning in drug addicts and nonaddicts. Journal of Clinical Psychology , 34(3), 790–794. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(197807)34:3<790::AID-JCLP2270340346>3.0.CO;2-P

Asch

S. E.

(1956). Studies of Independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718

Bailey

C. D.

Scott

Thoma

S. J.

(2010). Revitalizing accounting ethics research in the neo-kohlbergian framework: Putting the DIT into perspective. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 22(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2010.22.2.1

Batson

C. D.

(2010). Empathy-induced altruistic motivation. In Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 15–34). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12061-001

Bergman

(2002). Why be moral? A conceptual model from developmental psychology. In Human Development, 45(2), 104, 124. https://doi.org/10.1159/000048157. https://www.karger.com/journals/hde

Bjornestad

Svendsen

T. S.

Slyngstad

T. E.

Erga

A. H.

McKay

J. R.

Nesvåg

Moltu

(2019). “A life more ordinary” processes of 5-year recovery from substance abuse. Experiences of 30 recovered service users. Frontiers in psychiatry, 10(689). DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00689

Brugman

Beerthuizen

M. G. C. J.

Helmond

Basinger

K. S.

Gibbs

J. C.

(2023). Assessing moral judgment maturity using the sociomoral reflection measure-short form objective. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 39(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000680

10.

Burdman

(2024). Two problems about moral responsibility in the context of addiction. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy, 20(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.31820/EJAP.20.1.4

11.

Colby

Kohlberg

(1987) The measurement of moral judgement: Volume 2, Standard issue scoring manual (2). Cambridge University Press.

12.

Colby

Kohlberg

(2011). The measurement of Moral Judgment (Issue 1). Cambridge University Press.

13.

Corriveau

K. H.

Harris

P. L.

(2010). Preschoolers (Sometimes) defer to the majority in making simple perceptual judgments. Developmental Psychology, 46(2), 437–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017553

14.

Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In: Handbook of qualitative research. Sage.

15.

Earp

B. D.

Skorburg

J. A.

Everett

J. A. C.

Savulescu

(2019). Addiction, identity, morality. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 10(2), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2019.1590480

16.

Eisenberg-Berg

(1979). Development of children’s prosocial moral judgment. Developmental Psychology, IB(Issue 2), 101377. DOI:10.1037/0012-1649.15.2.128

17.

Elbaz

Gueta

Ronel

(2024). “I will fight tooth and nail for my recovery”: A typology of individuals in long-term recovery from addiction. Journal of Drug Issues, 50(3), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4468880/v1

18.

Elbaz

Ronel

Gueta

(2025). Like a steak at a vegan village”: adaptability as a cornerstone in stable recovery from substance and/or gambling addiction. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 1–16. DOI:10.1080/09687637.2025.2520513

19.

Ellemers

van der Toorn

Paunov

van Leeuwen

(2019). The psychology of morality: A review and analysis of empirical studies published from 1940 through 2017. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 23(4), 332–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318811759

20.

Faugier

Sargeant

(1997). Sampling hard to reach populations. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(4), 790–797. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00371.x

21.

Fisher

C. B.

(2011). Addiction research ethics and the belmont principles: Do drug users have a different moral voice? Substance Use & Misuse, 46(6), 728–741. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2010.528125

22.

FitzPatrick

(2019). Validity in qualitative health education research. Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning, 11(2), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.11.014

23.

Frank

L. E.

Nagel

S. K.

(2017). Addiction and moralization: The role of the underlying model of addiction. Neuroethics, 10(1), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-017-9307-x

24.

Gibbs

J. C.

(2019). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of kohlberg, hoffman, and Haidt. Oxford University Press.

25.

Gibbs

J. C.

Basinger

K. S.

Fuller

R. L.

(2013). Moral maturity: Measuring the development of sociomoral reflection. Routledge.

26.

Gilligan

(1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.

27.

Gilligan

Kohlberg

Lerner

Belenky

(1971). Moral reasoning. Technical Report of the Commission on Obscenity and Pornography: Preliminary Studies, 1(3), 141.

28.

Graham

(2014). Morality beyond the lab: Much of moral life involves attending to our own good deeds and to the bad deeds of others. Science (New York, N.Y.), 345(6202), 1242. DOI:10.1126/science.1259500

29.

Greene

Haidt

(2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work? In Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517, 523. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1364-6613(02)02011-9. https://tics.trends.com1364-6613/02/$-seefrontmatter

30.

Griffin

B. J.

Purcell

Burkman

Litz

B. T.

Bryan

C. J.

Schmitz

Villierme

Walsh

Maguen

(2019). Moral injury: An integrative review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 32(3), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22362

31.

Haidt

(2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X

32.

Hardy

S. A.

Carlo

(2011). Moral identity. In Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 495–513): Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_19

33.

Heather

(2016). Addiction as a form of akrasia. In Addiction and choice (pp. 133–150). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198727224.003.0008

34.

Heinonen

(2015). Van Manen’s method and reduction in a phenomenological hermeneutic study. Nurse Researcher, 22(4), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.4.35.e1326

35.

Husak

D. N.

(2004). The moral relevance of addiction. Substance Use & Misuse, 39(3), 399–436. https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-120029984

36.

Kesebir

Haidt

(2010). Morality (in handbook of social psychology). In Fiske

Gilbert

Lindzey

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed.). Springer Nature Link.

37.

Kohlberg

(1987). The development of moral judgment and moral action. Child Psychology and Childhood Education: A Cognitive-Developmental View, 259(49), 328.

38.

Kuhn

T. S.

(2009). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

39.

Kurtz

(1981) Shame and guilt: Characteristics of the dependency cycle: An historical perspective for professionals (7). Hazelden Publishing & Educational Services.

40.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

Pilotta

J. J.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9(4), 438–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

41.

Lyvers

(2000). “Loss of control” in alcoholism and drug addiction: A neuroscientific interpretation. https://doi.org/10.1037F1064-1297.8.2.225

42.

Maeda

Thoma

S. J.

Bebeau

M. J.

(2009). Understanding the relationship between moral judgment development and individual characteristics: The role of educational contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013381

43.

Malle

B. F.

(2021). Moral judgments. Annual Review of psychology, 72(1), 293-318. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-072220

44.

Marcovitz

D. E.

Maruti

Kast

K. A.

Suzuki

(2021). The use of therapeutic metaphor on an addiction consult service. Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry, 62(1), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psym.2020.09.003

45.

Maxwell

M. A.

(1984). The alcoholics Anonymous experience: A close-up view for professionals. McGraw-Hill.

46.

McGaffin

B. J.

Lyons

G. C. B.

Deane

F. P.

(2013). Self-forgiveness, shame, and guilt in recovery from drug and alcohol problems. Substance Abuse, 34(4), 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2013.781564

47.

Mcmahan

(2013). LaFollette-The blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory O Moral Intuition. Wiley.

48.

McNair

Okan

Hadjichristidis

de Bruin

W. B.

(2019). Age differences in moral judgment: Older adults are more deontological than younger adults. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 32(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2086

49.

Mooijman

Van Dijk

W. W.

(2015). The self in moral judgement: How self-affirmation affects the moral condemnation of harmless sexual taboo violations. Cognition & Emotion, 29(7), 1326–1334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.985187

50.

Ohayon

Ronel

(2024). A Kantian perspective on agency in addiction: Cultivating freedom. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 42(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347324.2024.2310270

51.

Ohayon

Ronel

(2025). The moral voice in addiction and the self. Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment, 170(4), 209624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.josat.2025.209624

52.

Piaget

(2013). The moral judgment of the child. Routledge.

53.

Pickard

(2017). Responsibility without blame for addiction. Neuroethics, 10(1), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9295-2

54.

Post

S. G.

(2005). Altruism, happiness, and health: It’s good to be good. Int J Behav Med, 12(2), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm1202_4

55.

Quednow

B. B.

(2020). Social cognition in addiction. In Cognition and addiction: A researcher’s guide from mechanisms towards interventions (pp. 63–78). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815298-0.00005-8

56.

Reeve

(2013). The morality of the “Immoral”: The case of homeless, drug-using street prostitutes. Deviant Behavior, 34(10), 824–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2013.781442

57.

Rest

J. R.

Narvaez

Thoma

S. J.

Bebeau

M. J.

(2000). A Neo-kohlbergian approach to morality research. Journal of Moral Education, 29(4), 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/713679390

58.

Robles

J. S.

(2022). Managing moral category implications of former drug addiction. Discourse & Society, 33(4), 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/09579265221088130

59.

Ronel

(1993). Narcotics Anonymous in Israel: Self help processes and religious faith among drug addicts. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Jerusalem. The Hebrew University (in Hebrew, English Summary).

60.

Ronel

(1997). The universality of a self-help program of American origin: Narcotics Anonymous in Israel. Social Work in Health Care, 25(3), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1300/J010v25n03_08

61.

Ronel

(1998). Twelve-Step self-help groups: The spontaneous emergence of grace communities. Social Development Issues, 20(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01609513.2022.2057393

62.

Ronel

Teichman

(2003). Moral judgment among alcohol-other drug dependent persons in recovery. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 21(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1300/J020v21n01_04

63.

Sedat

Ö. Ğ. Ü. T.

Sönmezkale

İ.

Işıktaş

(2022). Examination of teachers opinions on the importance of mnemonic strategies. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 12(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2017.1294879

64.

Shay

(2012). Moral injury. Intertexts, 16(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1353/itx.2012.0000

65.

Suddick

K. M.

Cross

Vuoskoski

Galvin

K. T.

Stew

(2020). The work of hermeneutic phenomenology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19(1609406920947600), 1609406920947600. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920947600

66.

Van Manen

(2017). But is it phenomenology? Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 775–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317699570

67.

Viens

A. M.

(2007). Addiction, responsibility and moral psychology. The American Journal of Bioethics: AJOB, 7(1), 17–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160601064033

68.

White

Kurtz

(2006). The varieties of recovery experience. International Journal of Self Help and Self Care, 3(Issue 2), 1316. DOI:10.2190/911R-MTQ5-VJ1H-75CU

69.

Zhang

Gong

(2020). A latent profile analysis of nurses’ moral sensitivity. Nursing Ethics, 27(3), 855–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733019876298

Moral Judgment and Reasoning in Addiction and Recovery

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References