Recovery identity – the degree to which someone identifies as “in recovery” from a substance use disorder – has been shown to be associated with a host of positive health outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to test the association between recovery identity, quality of life, spiritual well-being, and relational health in a sample of individuals in remission from moderate or severe SUDs recruited from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk crowdsourcing platform (n = 494). Results indicated that the presence of a recovery identity was significantly associated with greater spiritual health, but not significantly associated with psychological, social, or environmental quality of life, nor with family functioning. Results have important implications for understanding paths to recovery and important correlates of health outcomes.
American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
2.
AshfordR. D.BrownA.BrownT.CallisJ.ClevelandH. H.EisenhartE.GrooverH.HayesN.JohnstonT.KimballT.ManteuffelB.McDanielJ.MontgomeryL.PhillipsS.PolacekM.StatmanM.WhitneyJ. (2019). Defining and operationalizing the phenomena of recovery: A working definition from the recovery science research collaborative. Addiction Research & Theory, 27(3), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2018.1515352
3.
AustF.DiedenhofenB.UlrichS.MuschJ. (2013). Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research. Behavior Research Methods, 45(2), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0265-2
4.
BeckwithM.BestD.SavicM.HaslamC.BathishR.DingleG.MackenzieJ.StaigerP. K.LubmanD. I. (2019). Social identity mapping in addiction recovery (SIM-AR): Extension and application of a visual method. Addiction Research & Theory, 27(6), 462–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/16066359.2018.1544623
5.
BestD.AnderssonC.IrvingJ.EdwardsM. (2017). Recovery identity and wellbeing: Is it better to be ‘recovered’ or ‘in recovery. Journal of Groups in Addiction and Recovery, 12(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1556035X.2016.1272071
6.
BestD.BeckwithM.HaslamC.HaslamS. A.JettenJ.MawsonE.LubmanD. I. (2015). Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition: The social identity model of recovery (SIMOR). Addiction Research & Theory, 24(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2015.1075980
7.
BestD.GowJ.KnoxT.TaylorA.GroshkovaT.WhiteW. (2012). Mapping the recovery stories of drinkers and drug users in Glasgow: Quality of life and its associations with measures of recovery capital. Drug and Alcohol Review, 31(3), 334–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00321.x
8.
Betty Ford Consensus Panel. (2007). What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(3), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2007.06.001
9.
BraamA. W.KoenigH. G. (2019). Religion, spirituality and depression in prospective studies: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 257, 428–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.063
10.
BredleJ. M.SalsmanJ. M.DebbS. M.ArnoldB. J.CellaD. F. (2011). Spiritual wellbeing as a component of health-related quality of life: The functional assessment of chronic illness Therapy – spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp). Religions, 2(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel2010077
11.
BuckinghamS. A.FringsD.AlberyI. P. (2013). Group membership and social identity in addiction recovery. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 27(4), 1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032480
12.
BuhrmesterM. D.TalaifarS.GoslingS. D. (2018). An evaluation of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, its rapid rise, and its effective use. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617706516
13.
DermatisH.GalanterM. (2016). The role of twelve-step-related spirituality in addiction recovery. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(2), 510–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-015-0019-4
14.
DingleG. A.StarkC.CruwysT.BestD. (2015). Breaking good: Breaking ties with social groups may be good for recovery from substance misuse. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(2), 236–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12081
Faces and Voices of Recovery. (2013). Life in recovery: Report on the survey findings. Author.
17.
FleuryM.-J.DjouiniA.HuỳnhC.TremblayJ.FerlandF.MénardJ.-M.BellevilleG. (2016). Remission from substance use disorders: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 168(1), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.625
18.
FringsD.AlberyI. P. (2015). The social identity model of cessation maintenance: Formulation and initial evidence. Addictive Behaviours, 44, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.10.023
19.
GrantB. F.DawsonD. A.StinsonF. S.ChouP. S.KayW.PickeringR. (2003). The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-IV (AUDADIS- IV): Reliability of alcohol consumption, tobacco use, family history of depression and psychiatric diagnostic modules in a general population sample. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 71(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-8716(03)00070-x
20.
JamesA.WellsA. (2003). Religion and mental health: Towards a cognitive-behavioural framework. British Journal of Health Psychology, 8(3), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910703322370905
21.
KellyJ. F.GreeneM. C.BergmanB. G. (2018). Beyond abstinence: Changes in indices of quality of life with time in recovery in a nationally representative sample of U. S. adults. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 42(4), 770–780. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.13604
22.
LaudetA. B. (2007). What does recovery mean to you? Lessons from the recovery experience for research and practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(3), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2007.04.014
23.
Lev-RanS.Le StratY.ImtiazS.RehmJ.Le FollB. (2013). Gender differences in prevalence of substance use disorders among individuals with lifetime exposure to substances: Results from a large representative sample. The American Journal on Addictions, 22(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-0391.2013.00321.x
24.
McIntoshJ.McKeganeyN. (2000). Addicts’ narratives of recovery from drug use: Constructing a non-addict identity. Social Science & Medicine, 50(10), 1501–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00409-8
25.
MellisA. M.BickelW. K. (2020). Mechanical Turk data collection in addiction research: Utility, concerns and best practices. Addiction, 115(10), 1960–1968. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15032
26.
NicholsL. M.HuntB. (2011). The significance of spirituality for individuals with chronic illness: Implications for mental health counseling. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 33(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.33.1.025544189523j738
27.
SalsmanJ. M.PustejovskyJ. E.JimH. S. L.MunozA. R.MerluzziT. V.GeorgeL.ParkC. L.DanhauerS. C.ShermanA. C.SnyderM. A.FitchettG. (2015). A meta-analytic approach to examining the correlation between religion/spirituality and mental health in cancer. Cancer, 121(21), 3769–3778. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29350
28.
SobellL. C.EllingstadT. P.SobellM. B. (2000). Natural recovery from alcohol and drug problems: Methodological review of the research with suggestions for future directions. Addiction, 95(5), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.95574911.x
29.
StricklandJ. C.StoopsW. W. (2019). The use of crowdsourcing in addiction science research: Amazon Mechanical Turk. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 27(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000235
30.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinQ. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–48). Brooks/Cole.
31.
The WHOQOL Group. (1998). Development of the World health organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28(3), 551–558. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291798006667
32.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell.
33.
Uwland-SikkemaN. F.VisserA.WesterhofG. J.GarssenB. (2018). How is spirituality part of people’s meaning system?Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 10(2), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000172
34.
von GreiffN.SkogensL. (2021). Recovery and identity: A five-year follow-up of persons treated in 12-step-related programs. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy, 28(5), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687637.2021.1909535
35.
Walton-MossB.RayE. M.WoodruffK. (2013). Relationship of spirituality or religion to recovery from substance abuse: A systematic review. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 24(4), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000001
36.
WesslingK. S.HuberJ.NetzerO. (2017). MTurk character misrepresentation: Assessment and Solutions. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(1), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx053
37.
WhiteW. (2005). Recovery: Its history and renaissance as an organizing construct. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 23(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1300/J020v23n01_02
38.
WhiteW. (2007). Addiction recovery: Its definition and conceptual boundaries. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 33(3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2007.04.015
39.
WhiteW. (2014). Slaying the dragon: The history of addiction treatment and recovery in America (2nd ed.). Chestnut Health Systems.
WitkiewitzK.MontesK. S.SchwebelF. J.TuckerJ. A. (2020). What is recovery?Alcohol Research: Current Reviews, 40(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.35946/arcr.v40.3.01
