This study investigates the combination of several psychological factors related to tobacco smoking to identify smokers’ psychological profiles among French university students. A cluster analysis was performed on smoking motives, psychosocial variables, and the smoker identity (N = 909). Five profiles were identified and then compared regarding tobacco dependence and motivations to quit. “Normative” and “sociohedonist smokers” are characterized by two distinct social factors (normative influences and social motives) and moderate dependence. “Dependent identified smokers” have higher levels of dependence motives, smoker identity and tobacco dependence associated with low motivations to quit. “Inconsistent smokers” have weak smoker identity and weak smoking motives, a strong perceived control over resisting smoking, low dependence and motivations to quit. “Coping smokers” have strong sedative and addictive motives and exhibit moderate dependence and motivations to quit. This research encourages prevention programs to consider the diversity of student smokers with strategies adapted to their psychological profiles.
AjzenI. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
BergC. J.LustK. A.SanemJ. R.KirchM. A.RudieM.EhlingerE.AhluwaliaJ. S.AnL. C. (2009). Smoker self-identification versus recent smoking among college students. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(4), 333–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.11.010
5.
BergC. J.ParelkarP. P.LessardL.EscofferyC.KeglerM. C.SterlingK. L.AhluwaliaJ. S. (2010). Defining “smoker”: College student attitudes and related smoking characteristics. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 12(9), 963–969. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq123
6.
BerlinI.SingletonE. G.PedarriosseA. M.LancrenonS.RamesA.AubinH. J.NiauraR. (2003). The modified reasons for smoking scale: Factorial structure, gender effects and relationship with nicotine dependence and smoking cessation in French smokers. Addiction, 98(11), 1575–1583. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00523.x
BizeR.BurnandB.MuellerY.Rège WaltherM.CornuzJ. (2009). Biomedical risk assessment as an aid for smoking cessation. In BizeR. (Ed.), Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Issue 2). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004705.pub3
9.
BlondéJ.Falomir-PichastorJ.-M. (2021). Tobacco dependence and motivation to quit smoking: An identity-based framework (Adicción al tabaco y motivación para dejar de fumar: Una perspectiva identitaria). International Journal of Social Psychology, 36(2), 215–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2021.1882224
10.
BrownA. E.CarpenterM. J.SutfinE. L. (2011). Occasional smoking in college: Who, what, when and why?Addictive Behaviors, 36(12), 1199–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.07.024
11.
ButlerA. C.ChapmanJ. E.FormanE. M.BeckA. T. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003
12.
CengelliS.O’LoughlinJ.LauzonB.CornuzJ. (2012). A systematic review of longitudinal population-based studies on the predictors of smoking cessation in adolescent and young adult smokers. Tobacco Control, 21(3), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2011.044149
13.
ChamberlainS. R.OdlaugB. L.SchreiberL. R. N.GrantJ. E. (2012). Association between tobacco smoking and cognitive functioning in young adults. American Journal on Addictions, 21(Suppl 1), S14–S19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-0391.2012.00290.x
14.
ChoiY.ChoiS. M.RifonN. (2010). I smoke but i am not a smoker”: Phantom smokers and the discrepancy between self-identity and behavior. Journal of American College Health, 59(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.483704
ComeauN.StewartS. H.LobaP. (2001). The relations of trait anxiety, anxiety sensitivity, and sensation seeking to adolescents’ motivations for alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use. Addictive Behaviors, 26(6), 803–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(01)00238-6
DiClementeC. C.ProchaskaJ. O. (1982). Self-change and therapy change of smoking behavior: A comparison of processes of change in cessation and maintenance. Addictive Behaviors, 7(2), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(82)90038-7
19.
DupontP.TackV.BlechaL.ReynaudM.BenyaminaA.AmiroucheA.AubinH. J. (2015). Smoker’s identity scale: Measuring identity in tobacco dependence and its relationship with confidence in quitting. American Journal on Addictions, 24(7), 607–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajad.12272
20.
EtterJ. F.Le HouezecJ.PernegerT. V. (2003). A self-administered questionnaire to measure dependence on cigarettes: The cigarette dependence scale. Neuropsychopharmacology, 28(2), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300030
21.
EtterJ.-F. (2005). A comparison of the content-construct- and predictive validity of the cigarette dependence scale and the Fagerström test for nicotine dependence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 77(3), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.08.015
22.
Falomir-PichastorJ. M.BlondéJ.DesrichardO.FelderM.RiedoG.FollyL. (2020). Tobacco dependence and smoking cessation: The mediating role of smoker and ex-smoker self-concepts. Addictive Behaviors, 102(2020), 106200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106200
23.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
24.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (2011). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis.
25.
FointiatV.GirandolaF.GoslingP. (2013). La dissonance cognitive: Quand les actes changent les idées. Armand Colin.
26.
GallagherK. M.UpdegraffJ. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7
27.
GilpinE. A.WhiteV. M.PierceJ. P. (2005). What fraction of young adults are at risk for future smoking, and who are they?Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 7(5), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200500259796
28.
HairJ. F.,JrBlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
29.
HayesE. R.PlowfieldL. A. (2007). Smoking too young: Students’ decisions about tobacco use. MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 32(2), 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NMC.0000264292.72221.ef
30.
HertelA. W.MermelsteinR. J. (2012). Smoker identity and smoking escalation among adolescents. Health Psychology, 31(4), 467–475. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028923
31.
HertelA. W.MermelsteinR. J. (2016). Smoker identity development among adolescents who smoke. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30(4), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000171
32.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
33.
HughesJ. R.OlivetoA. H.RiggsR.KennyM.LiguoriA.PillitteriJ. L.MacLaughlinM. A. (2004). Concordance of different measures of nicotine dependence: Two pilot studies. Addictive Behaviors, 29(8), 1527–1539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.02.031
34.
HummelK.NagelhoutG. E.FongG. T.VardavasC. I.PapadakisS.HerbećA.MonsU.van den PutteB.BorlandR.FernándezE.de VriesH.McNeillA.GravelyS.PrzewoźniakK.KovacsP.TroforA. C.WillemsenM. C.The EUREST-PLUS Consortium (2018). Quitting activity and use of cessation assistance reported by smokers in eight European countries: Findings from the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe surveys. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 16(Suppl 2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/98912
35.
IkardF. F.GreenD. E.HornD. (1969). A scale to differentiate between types of smoking as related to the management of affect. Substance Use & Misuse, 4(4), 649–659. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826086909062040
36.
JalilianF.JoulaeiH.Mirzaei-AlavijehM.SamannezhadB.BerimvandiP.MatinB. K.MahboubiM. (2016). Cognitive factors related to cigarettes smoking among college students: An application of theory of planned. Social Sciences (Pakistan), 11(7), 1189–1193. https://doi.org/10.3923/sscience.2016.1189.1193
37.
JarvisM. J. (2003). Prevalence of hardcore smoking in England, and associated attitudes and beliefs: Cross sectional study. British Medical Journal, 326(7398), 1061. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7398.1061
38.
KangS. K.BodenhausenG. V. (2015). Multiple identities in social perception and interaction: Challenges and opportunities. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 547–574. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015025
39.
KendzierskiD.WhitakerD. J. (1997). The role of self-schema in linking intentions with behavior. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297232003
40.
KenfordS. L.WetterD. W.WelschS. K.SmithS. S.FioreM. C.BakerT. B. (2005). Progression of college-age cigarette samplers: What influences outcome. Addictive Behaviors, 30(2), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.05.017
KotzD.BrownJ.WestR. (2013). Predictive validity of the motivation to stop scale (MTSS): A single-item measure of motivation to stop smoking. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 128(1–2), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.07.012
43.
LannoyS.BillieuxJ.PoncinM.MaurageP. (2017). Binging at the campus: Motivations and impulsivity influence binge drinking profiles in university students. Psychiatry Research, 250(2017), 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2017.01.068
44.
LeeH. S.CatleyD.HarrisK. J. (2014). Improving understanding of the quitting process: Psychological predictors of quit attempts versus smoking cessation maintenance among college students. Substance Use & Misuse, 49(10), 1332–1339. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2014.901386
45.
LevinsonA. H.CampoS.GascoigneJ.JollyO.ZakharyanA.TranZ. V. (2007). Smoking, but not smokers: Identity among college students who smoke cigarettes. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 9(8), 845–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200701484987
46.
MaJ.BettsN. M.HamplJ. S. (2000). Clustering of lifestyle behaviors: The relationship between cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and dietary intake. American Journal of Health Promotion, 15(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-15.2.107
47.
MaoR.LiX.StantonB.WangJ.HongY.ZhangH.ChenX. (2009). Psychosocial correlates of cigarette smoking among college students in China. Health Education Research, 24(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyn002
48.
MartinelliA. M. (1999). An explanatory model of variables influencing health promotion behaviors in smoking and nonsmoking college students. Public Health Nursing, 16(4), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1446.1999.00263.x
49.
MauduyM.MaunyN.BeaunieuxH.MangeJ. (2022). Vers une sortie efficace du tabac en identifiant les leviers et obstacles psychologiques à l’arrêt [poster]. 17th GREPACO Congress, Lausanne, Switzerland, 26–30 June 2022.
50.
MauduyM. (2022). Rôle des normes sociales dans la production et compréhension de l’effet d’hypocrisie induite: Application à la prévention des discriminations. Université de Caen Normandie.
51.
MontañoD. E.KasprzykD. (2015). Reasoned action, planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research and Pratice, 70(4), 67–96.
OksuzE.MutluE. T.MalhanS. (2007). Characteristics of daily and occasional smoking among youths. Public Health, 121(5), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2006.12.007
54.
PancaniL.D’addarioM.CappellettiE. R.GrecoA.MonzaniD.StecaP. (2015). Smoking behavior: A cross-sectional study to assess the dimensionality of the brief wisconsin inventory of smoking dependence motives and identify different typologies among young daily smokers. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 17(1), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu143
55.
Pardavila-BelioM. I.Ruiz-CanelaM.Canga-ArmayorN. (2019). Predictors of smoking cessation among college students in a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Prevention Science, 20(5), 765–775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01004-6
56.
PasquereauA.GautierA.AndlerR.GuignardR.RichardJ. B.Nguyen-ThanhV. (2017). Tobacco and e-cigarette in France: Levels of consumption according to the preliminary results from the 2016. Health Barometer.
57.
PearsonM. R.BravoA. J.ConnerB. T. (2017). Distinguishing subpopulations of marijuana users with latent profile analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 172(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.043
58.
PerkinsJ. M.PerkinsH. W.JurinskyJ.CraigD. W. (2019). Adolescent tobacco use and misperceptions of social norms across schools in the United States. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 80(6), 659–668. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2019.80.659
59.
PerskiO.HerdN.BrownJ.WestR. (2018). Does consistent motivation to stop smoking improve the explanation of recent quit attempts beyond current motivation? A cross-sectional study. Addictive Behaviors, 81(2018), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.01.037
60.
PiaseckiT. M.RichardsonA. E.SmithS. M. (2007). Self-monitored motives for smoking among college students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 21(3), 328–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.21.3.328
61.
PiperM. E.PiaseckiT. M.FedermanE. B.BoltD. M.SmithS. S.FioreM. C.BakerT. B. (2004). A multiple motives approach to tobacco dependence: The wisconsin inventory of smoking dependence motives (WISDM-68). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.2.139
62.
PrioloD.PeltA.BauzelR. S.RubensL.VoisinD.FointiatV. (2019). Three decades of research on induced hypocrisy: A meta-analysis. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(12), 1681–1701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219841621
63.
Riou FrançaL.DautzenbergB.FalissardB.ReynaudM. (2009). Are social norms associated with smoking in French university students? A survey report on smoking correlates. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 4(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-4-4
64.
RosaJ. D.Aloise-YoungP. (2015). A qualitative study of smoker identity among college student smokers. Substance Use & Misuse, 50(12), 1510–1517. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2015.1018549
65.
SchulenbergJ.JohnstonL. D.O’MalleyP.BachmanJ.MiechR. A.PatrickM. E. (2019). Monitoring the future national survey results on drug use, 1975–2018: Volume II, college students and adults ages 19-60. The University of Michigan. http://monitoringthefuture.org/pubs.html#monographs
66.
ShadelW. G.MermelsteinR. (1996). Individual differences in self-concept among smokers attempting to quit: Validation and predictive utility of measures of the smoker self-concept and abstainer self-concept. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 18(3), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02883391
67.
ShiffmanS.KasselJ. D.PatyJ.GnysM.Zettler-SegalM. (1994). Smoking typology profiles of chippers and regular smokers. Journal of Substance Abuse, 6(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3289(94)90052-3
68.
SmithB. W.ShelleyB. M.DalenJ.WigginsK.TooleyE.BernardJ. (2008). A pilot study comparing the effects of mindfulness-based and cognitive-behavioral stress reduction. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 14(3), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2007.0641
69.
SmithS. S.PiperM. E.BoltD. M.FioreM. C.WetterD. W.CinciripiniP. M.BakerT. B. (2010). Development of the brief wisconsin inventory of smoking dependence motives. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 12(5), 489–499. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq032
70.
SteinbergM. L.ZiedonisD. M.KrejciJ. A.BrandonT. H. (2004). Motivational interviewing with personalized feedback: A brief intervention for motivating smokers with schizophrenia to seek treatment for tobacco dependence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(4), 723–728. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.4.723
71.
SteinmetzH.KnappsteinM.AjzenI.SchmidtP.KabstR. (2016). How effective are behavior change interventions based on the theory of planned behavior?: A three-level meta analysis. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 224(3), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000255
TalipT.MurangZ.KifliN.NaingL. (2016). Systematic review of smoking initiation among Asian adolescents, 2005–2015: Utilizing the frameworks of triadic influence and planned behavior. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 17(7), 3341–3355.
74.
ThompsonB.CoronadoG.ChenL.ThompsonL. A.HalperinA.JaffeR.McAfeeT.ZbikowskiS. M. (2007). Prevalence and characteristics of smokers at 30 Pacific Northwest colleges and universities. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 9(3), 429–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200701188844
75.
ThrulJ.BühlerA.FergusonS. G. (2014). Situational and mood factors associated with smoking in young adult light and heavy smokers. Drug and Alcohol Review, 33(4), 420–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.12164
76.
TomborI.ShahabL.BrownJ.WestR. (2013). Positive smoker identity as a barrier to quitting smoking: Findings from a national survey of smokers in England. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 133(2), 740–745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.09.001
77.
Vallentin-HolbechL.RasmussenB. M.StockC. (2018). Effects of the social norms intervention the GOOD life on norm perceptions, binge drinking and alcohol-related harms: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. Preventive Medicine Reports, 12(2018), 304–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.10.019
78.
VillantiA. C.WestJ. C.KlempererE. M.GrahamA. L.MaysD.MermelsteinR. J.HigginsS. T. (2020). Smoking-cessation interventions for US young adults: Updated systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 59(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.021
79.
WebbT. L.SheeranP. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249
80.
WestR.HardyA. (2007). The PRIME theory of motivation as a possible foundation for addiction treatment in the 21st century. In WestR.HenningfieldJ.SantoraP. (Eds.), Drug addiction treatment in the 21st century: Science and policy issues. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
