Drug Smuggling Seizures: The Effects of Reporting Consistency and Quality on the Observed Transnational Structure

Abstract

If it is possible to overcome significant data challenges, social network analytics could be used to expose structural vulnerabilities in transnational drug smuggling operations, offering clear targets for crime control efforts that aim to disrupt transhipment. This study explores the extent to which data inclusion decisions might distort the emergent structure of nation-to-nation smuggling networks mapped with aggregate intelligence using United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) incident level seizure data (2010–2016). Bivariate exponential random graph models (ERGM) show that relaxing data inclusion standards exposes illicit backchannels (reciprocity) and a more complete picture of major transhipment activity (activity and popularity spread) than would be otherwise undetected. Relaxed data inclusion standards may help to adjust for the data limitations associated with the detection of rare events and inconsistent reporting practices, if usage rules are followed.

Keywords

data filters drug seizures drug smuggling transnational crime network analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aziani

Berlusconi

Giommoni

(2021). A quantitative application of enterprise and social embeddedness theories to the transnational trafficking of cocaine in Europe. Deviant Behavior, 42(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2019.1666606

Belli

(2012). Where political extremists and greedy criminals meet: A comparative study of financial crimes and criminal networks in the United States. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, BiblioGov.

Bichler

(2019). Understanding criminal networks: A research guide. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Fathurrohman Bichler

(2021). Explaining the positional importance of actors involved in trafficking methamphetamine into Indonesia. Global Crime, 22(2), 93–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2020.1819249

Bichler

Malm

Cooper

(2017). Drug supply networks: A systematic review of the organizational structure of illicit drug trade. Crime Science, 6, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-017-0063-3

Boivin

(2014a). Risks, prices, and positions: A social network analysis of illegal drug trafficking in the world-economy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(2), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2013.12.004

Boivin

(2014b). Macrosocial network analysis: The case of transnational drug trafficking. In Masys

(Eds.), Networks and network analysis for defence and security. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04147-6_3

Bright

Brewer

Morselli

(2021). Using social network analysis to study crime: Navigating the challenges of criminal justice records. Social Networks, 66, 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2021.01.006

Bright

D. A.

Delaney

J. J.

(2013). Evolution of a drug trafficking network: Mapping changes in network structure and function across time. Global Crime, 14(2-3), 238–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2013.787927

10.

Bright

D. A.

Greenhill

Reynolds

Ritter

Morselli

(2014). The use of actor-level attributes and centrality measures to identify key actors: A case study of an Australian drug trafficking network. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 31(3), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986214553378

11.

Broséus

Rhumorbarbe

Morelato

Staehli

Rossy

(2017). A geographical analysis of trafficking on a popular darknet market. Forensic Science International, 277, 88–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.05.021

12.

Calderoni

(2012). The structure of drug trafficking mafias: The ‘Ndrangheta and cocaine. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 58(3), 321–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-012-9387-9

13.

Calderoni

(2015). Network analysis of organized crime meetings as a tool for the identification of leadership positions. In Bichler

Malm

(Eds.), Disrupting criminal networks: Network analysis in crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, (Vol. 28, pp. 89–110). Boulder, CO: First Forum Press.

14.

Campana

Varese

(2012). Listening to the wire: Criteria and techniques for the quantitative analysis of phone intercepts. Trends in Organized Crime, 15(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-011-9131-3

15.

Caulkins

J. P.

Burnett

Leslie

(2009). How illegal drugs enter an island country: Insights from interviews with incarcerated smugglers. Global Crime 10(1-2), 66–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440570902782477

16.

Cornell

S. E.

(2005). The interaction of narcotics and conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 42(6), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343305057895

17.

Décary-Hétu

Paquet-Clouston

Aldridge

(2016). Going international? Risk taking by cryptomarket drug vendors. International Journal of Drug Policy, 35, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.06.003

18.

Diviák

(2019). Key aspects of covert networks data collection: Problems, challenges, and opportunities. Social Networks, 69, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.10.002

19.

Diviák

Dijkstra

J. K.

Snijders

T. A. B.

(2020). Poisonous connections: a case study on a Czech counterfeit alcohol distribution network. Global Crime, 21(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440572.2019.1645653

20.

Duijn

P. A. C.

Kashirin

Sloot

P. M. A.

(2014). The relative ineffectiveness of criminal network disruption. Scientific Reports, 4(4238), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04238

21.

Duxbury

S. W.

Haynie

D. L.

(2018) The network structure of opioid distribution on a darknet cryptomarket. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34(4), 921–941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-017-9359-4

22.

Faust

Tita

G. E.

(2019). Social networks and crime: Pitfalls and promises for advancing the field. Annual Review of Criminology, 2(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024701

23.

Giommoni

Berlusconi

Aziani

(2021). Interdicting international drug trafficking: A Network approach for coordinated and targeted interventions. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-020-09473-0

24.

Gleditsch

N. P.

Wallensteen

Eriksson

Sollenberg

Strand

, (2002). Armed conflict 1946-2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 39(5), 615–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343302039005007

25.

Graif

Lungeanu

Yetter

, (2017). Neighborhood isolation in Chicago: Violent crime effects on increasing structural isolation and homophily in inter- neighborhood commuting networks. Social Networks, 51, 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2017.01.007

26.

Knoke

Yang

(2008). Social networks analysis. (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series, No. 154), (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

27.

Koskinen

J. H.

Robins

G. L.

Wang

Pattison

P. E.

(2013). Bayesian analysis for partially observed network data, missing ties, attributes and actors. Social networks, 35(4), 514–527.

28.

Kukhianidze

(2006). Smuggling through conflict zones in Georgia and security in the Caucasus. NATO Security through Science Series E, Human and Societal Dynamics, 10, 117.

29.

Lewis

Papachristos

A. V.

(2020). Rules of the game: Exponential random graph models of a gang homicide network. Social Forces, 98(4), 1829–1858. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soz106

30.

Lusher

Koskinen

Robins

(2013). Exponential random graph models for social networks . In Theory, methods, and applications (35). Cambridge University Press.

31.

Lusher

Robins

(2013). Example exponential random graph model analysis. Exponential random graph models for social networks, 37–46.

32.

Malm

Bichler

(2011). Networks of collaborating criminals: Assessing the structural vulnerability of drug markets. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48(2), 271–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427810391535

33.

Malm

Bichler

Van De Walle

(2010). Comparing ties that bind criminal networks: Is blood thicker than water? Security Journal, 23(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2009.18

34.

Morselli

(2001). Structuring Mr. Nice: Entrepreneurial opportunities and brokerage positioning in the cannabis trade. Crime, Law and Social Change, 35(3), 203–244. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011272411727

35.

Morselli

(2009). Hells angels in the Springtime. Trends in Organized Crime, 12(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-009-9065-1

36.

Morselli

Petit

(2007). Law enforcement disruption of a drug importation network. Global Crime, 8(2), 109–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17440570701362208

37.

Norbutas

(2018). Offline constraints in online drug marketplaces: An exploratory analysis of a cryptomarket trade network. International Journal of Drug Policy, 56, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.03.016

38.

Oldenburg

Van Duijn

Veenstra

(2018). Defending one’s friends, not one’s enemies: A social network analysis of children’s defending, friendship, and dislike relationships using XPNet. Plos One, 13(5), Article e0194323. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194323

39.

Pettersson

Davis

Deniz

Engström

Hawach

Högbladh

Sollenberg

Öberg

(2021). Organized violence 1989-2020, with a special emphasis on Syria. Journal of Peace Research, 58(4), 809–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/00223433211026126

40.

Robins

Pattison

Kalish

Lusher

(2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social networks, 29(2), 173–191.

41.

Schaefer

D. R.

(2012). Youth co-offending networks: An investigation of social and spatial effects. Social Networks, 34, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.02.001

42.

Wang

Robins

Pattison

Koskinen

(2009). PNet: Program for the simulation and estimation of exponential random graph models. Parkville: Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne.

43.

Wasserman

Faust

(1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.16 MB