The nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NMUPS) is becoming more common among college students. Identifying the variables associated with NMUPS is important for educational efforts and to promote wellness in vulnerable students. The present study examined the relationships between self-reported invincibility, alcohol problems, and NMUPS in 175 college students. Path analysis tested the hypotheses that males would report higher invincibility that would be related to alcohol use and alcohol problems. Using structural equation modeling, significant relationships were found between invincibility and alcohol-related problems. Alcohol problems may be related to NMUPS. A total effect of invincibility, mediated by alcohol use, may be a path whereby invincibility positively influences NMUPS. Students reporting high levels of invincibility may be at risk for the NMUPS and might benefit from efforts regarding the potential harmful consequences of taking these substances without a prescription.
BensonK.FloryK.HumphreysK. L.LeeS. S. (2015). Misuse of stimulant medication among college students: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 18, 50-76.
2.
BrownN. (2016). Creation and validation of a perceived invincibility survey instrument. Unpublished manuscript, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel HIll, NC. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/210605632.pdf
3.
EganK. L.ReboussinB. A.BlockerJ. N.WolfsonM.SutfinE. L. (2013). Simultaneous use of non-medical ADHD prescription stimulants and alcohol among undergraduate students. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 131, 71-77. DOI:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.12.004.
4.
ElkindD. (1978). Understanding the young adolescent. Adolescence, 13(49), 127–134.
5.
EngsR. C.HansonD. J. (1994). The student alcohol questionnaire: An updated reliability of the drinking patterns, problems, knowledge, and attitude subscales. Psychological Reports, 74, 12-14.
6.
Herman-StahlM. A.KrebsC. P.KroutilL. A.HellerD. C. (2007). Risk and protective factors for methamphetamine use and nonmedical use of prescription stimulants among young adults aged 18 to 25. Addictive Behaviors32, 1003–1015.
KelleyK.PornprasertmanitS.. (2016). Confidence intervals for population reliability coefficients: Evaluation of methods, recommendations, and software for composite measures. Psychological Methods, 21, 69-92.
9.
KennedyS.AllenM.KennedyG.J. (2019). Using latent profile analysis to assess students’ attitudes about underage drinking and prescription stimulant misuse. North American Journal of Psychology, 21, 831-842.
10.
LapsleyD. K. (1993). Toward an integrative theory of adolescent ego development: The “new look” at adolescent egocentrism. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 63, 562-571.
11.
LapsleyD. K (2003). The two faces of adolescent invulnerability. In RomerD (Ed.), Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach (pp. 25-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
McCabeS. E.TeterC. J. (2007). Drug use related problems among nonmedical users of prescription stimulants: A web-based survey of college students from a midwestern University. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 91, 69-76.
13.
McCabeS. E.WestB. T.TeterC. J.BoydC. J. (2014). Trends in medical use, diversion, and nonmedical use of prescription medications among college students from 2003 to 2013: Connecting the dots. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 1176-1182.
14.
MessinaB. G.SilvestriM. M.DiulioA. R.MurphyJ. G.GarzaK. B.CorreiaC. J. (2014). Alcohol use, impulsivity, and the non-medical use of prescription stimulants among college students. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 1798–1803.
15.
MillsteinS.G.Halpern-FelsherB.L. (2002). Judgments about Risk and Perceived Invulnerability in Adolescents and Young Adults. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12(4), 399–422.
Nolan-HoeksemaS. (2004). Gender differences in risk factors and consequences for alcohol use and problems. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 981-1010.
18.
ParkM. J.Paul MulyeT.AdamsS. H.BrindisC. D.IrwinC. E. (2006). The health status of young adults in the United States. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 305–317.
19.
R Core Team. (2017). A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org./.
20.
RavertR. D.SchwartzS. J.ZamboangaB. L.KimS. Y.WeisskirchR. S.BersaminM. (2009). Sensation seeking and danger invulnerability: paths to college student risk-taking. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 763-768.
21.
RavertR. D.ZimetG. D. (2009). College student invulnerability beliefs and HIV vaccine acceptability. American Journal of Health Behavior, 33, 391-9.
22.
RevelleW. (2017). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. Evanston, IL, USA: Northwestern University. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psychVersion= 1.7.8.
23.
RosseelY. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1-36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
24.
SteinbergL. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78-106. DOI:10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002.
25.
WickmanM.GreenbergC.BorenD. (2010). The relationship of perception of invincibility, demographics, and risk behaviors in adolescents of military parents. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 24, 25-33.
26.
WickmanM. E.Koniak-GriffinD. (2013). Invincibility fable: tool development to measure invincibility. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 28, 575-584.
27.
ZulligK. J.DivinA. L. (2012). The association between non-medical prescription drug use, depressive symptoms, and suicidality among college students. Addictive Behaviors, 37, 890-899.
