Graphic warning labels (GWLs) on cigarette packs have been tested among diverse groups at high risk for tobacco use. However, little is known about the effectiveness of GWL interventions for persons with substance use disorders, whose smoking prevalence is 3 to 4 times that of the general population. After a experimental study which exposed clients in residential addiction treatment to GWLs for 30 days, we conducted five focus groups with trial participants (N = 33) to explore how exposure to the labels may have impacted their readiness to quit smoking. Focus group interviews were analyzed thematically. Interviewees reported that GWLs were more effective than text-based warnings for increasing quit intentions due to greater cognitive and emotional impact. Male and female interviewees expressed gender-specific reactions to the labels. Addiction treatment programs are a strategic site for GWL and other tobacco interventions due to the tobacco-vulnerable populations they serve.
AzagbaS.SharafM. F. (2013). The effect of graphic cigarette warning labels on smoking behavior: Evidence from the Canadian experience. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 15, 708-717.
2.
BandieraF. C.AntenehB.LeT.DelucchiK.GuydishJ. (2015). Tobacco-related mortality among persons with mental health and substance abuse problems. PLoS ONE, 10(3), Article e0120581.
3.
BellK.DennisS.RobinsonJ.MooreR. (2015). Does the hand that controls the cigarette packet rule the smoker? Findings from ethnographic interviews with smokers in Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom and the USA. Social Science & Medicine, 142, 136-144.
4.
BigmanC. A.NaglerR. H.ViswanathK. (2016). Representation, exemplification, and risk: Resonance of tobacco graphic health warnings across diverse populations. Health Communication, 31, 974-987.
5.
BorlandR.YongH. H.WilsonN.FongG. T.HammondD.CummingsK. M.. . . McNeillA. (2009). How reactions to cigarette packet health warnings influence quitting: Findings from the ITC Four-Country Survey. Addiction, 104, 669-675.
6.
BrewerN. T.HallM. G.NoarS. M.ParadaH.Stein-SeroussiA.BachL. E.. . . RibislK. M. (2016). Effect of pictorial cigarette pack warnings on changes in smoking behavior: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176, 905-912.
CataldoJ. K.HunterM.PetersenA. B.SheonN. (2015). Positive and instructive anti-smoking messages speak to older smokers: A focus group study. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 13, Article 2.
9.
ChanY.-F.DennisM. L.FunkR. R. (2008). Prevalence and comorbidity of major internalizing and externalizing problems among adolescents and adults presenting to substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 34, 14-24.
10.
ColettiD. J.BrunetteM.JohnM.KaneJ. M.MalhotraA. K.RobinsonD. G. (2015). Responses to tobacco smoking-related health messages in young people with recent-onset schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 41, 1256-1265.
11.
CookB.WayneG.KafaliE.LiuZ.ShuC.FloresM. (2014). Trends in smoking among adults with mental illness and association between mental health treatment and smoking cessation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 311, 172-182.
12.
EmeryL. F.RomerD.SheerinK. M.JamiesonK. H.PetersE. (2014). Affective and cognitive mediators of the impact of cigarette warning labels. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 16, 263-269.
13.
Erceg-HurnD. M.SteedL. G. (2011). Does exposure to cigarette health warnings elicit psychological reactance in smokers?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41, 219-237.
14.
FongG. T.HammondD.HitchmanS. C. (2009). The impact of pictures on the effectiveness of tobacco warnings. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87, 640-643.
15.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
16.
GuillaumierA.BonevskiB.PaulC. (2014). Tobacco health warning messages on plain cigarette packs and in television campaigns: A qualitative study with Australian socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers. Health Education Research, 30, 57-66.
17.
GuydishJ.PassalacquaE.TajimaB.ChanM.ChunJ.BostromA. (2011). Smoking prevalence in addiction treatment: A review. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 13, 401-411.
18.
GuydishJ.TajimaB.LeT.HendersonC.YipD.GruberV.. . . DelucchiK. L. (2016). Do cigarette graphic warnings encourage smokers to attend a smoking cessation programme: A quasi-experimental study. Tobacco Control. Advance online publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053207.
19.
HallM. G.PeeblesK.BachL. E.NoarS. M.RibislK. M.BrewerN. T. (2015). Social interactions sparked by pictorial warnings on cigarette packs. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12, 13195-13208.
20.
HammondD.FongG. T.McDonaldP. W.BrownK. S.CameronR. (2004). Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes: Evidence from Canadian smokers. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 1442-1445.
21.
HammondD.FongG. T.McDonaldP. W.CameronR.BrownK. S. (2003). Impact of the graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behaviour. Tobacco Control, 12, 391-395.
22.
HoekJ.Hoek-SimsA.GendallP. (2013). A qualitative exploration of young adult smokers’ responses to novel tobacco warnings. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 609.
23.
HurtR. D.OffordK. P.CroghanI. T.Gomez-DahlL.KottkeT. E.MorseR. M.MeltonL. J.III. (1996). Mortality following inpatient addictions treatment. Role of tobacco use in a community-based cohort. Journal of the American Medical Association, 275, 1097-1103.
24.
KalmanD.MorissetteS. B.GeorgeT. P. (2005). Co-morbidity of smoking in patients with psychiatric and substance use disorders. The American Journal on Addictions, 14, 106-123.
25.
KatzE.LazarsfeldP. F. (1966). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
26.
KeesJ.BurtonS.AndrewsJ. C.KozupJ. (2010). Understanding how graphic pictorial warnings work on cigarette packaging. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 29, 265-276.
27.
LevisD. M.Stone-WigginsB.O’HegartyM.TongV. T.PolenK. N. D.CassellC. H.CouncilM. (2014). Women’s perspectives on smoking and pregnancy and graphic warning labels. American Journal of Health Behavior, 38, 755-764.
28.
MalouffJ. M.SchutteN. S.RookeS. E.MacDonellG. (2012). Effects on smokers of exposure to graphic warning images. The American Journal on Addictions, 21, 555-557.
29.
McCoolJ.WebbL.CameronL. D.HoekJ. (2012). Graphic warning labels on plain cigarette packs: Will they make a difference to adolescents?Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1269-1273.
30.
McQueenA.KreuterM. W.BoyumS.ThompsonV. S.CaburnayC. A.WatersE. A.. . . FuQ. (2015). Reactions to FDA-proposed graphic warning labels affixed to U.S. smokers’ cigarette packs. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 17, 784-795.
31.
MeadE. L.CohenJ. E.KennedyC. E.GalloJ.LatkinC. A. (2015). The role of theory-driven graphic warning labels in motivation to quit: A qualitative study on perceptions from low-income, urban smokers. BMC Public Health, 15(1), Article 92.
32.
MillerC. L.HillD. J.QuesterP. G.HillerJ. E. (2009). Impact on the Australian Quitline of new graphic cigarette pack warnings including the Quitline number. Tobacco Control, 18, 235-237.
O’HegartyM.PedersonL. L.YenokyanG.NelsonD.WortleyP. (2007). Young adults’ perceptions of cigarette warning labels in the United States and Canada. Preventing Chronic Disease, 4(2), Article 27.
35.
OsmanA.ThrasherJ. F.CayirE.HardinJ. W.Perez-HernandezR.FroeligerB. (2016). Depressive symptoms and responses to cigarette pack warning labels among Mexican smokers. Health Psychology, 35, 442-453.
36.
PartosT. R.BorlandR.YongH.-H.ThrasherJ.HammondD. (2013). Cigarette packet warning labels can prevent relapse: Findings from the International Tobacco Control 4-Country policy evaluation cohort study. Tobacco Control, 22(e1), e43-e50.
37.
PopovaL. (2016). Can we resolve the disconnect between how communication interventions work and how we evaluate them?Health Education & Behavior, 43, 121-124.
38.
ProchaskaJ. O.VelicerW. F. (1997). The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 12, 38-48.
ReiterP. L.Broder-OldachB.WewersM. E.KleinE. G.PaskettE. D.KatzM. L. (2012). Appalachian Residents’ Perspectives on New U.S. Cigarette Warning Labels. Journal of Community Health, 37(6), 1269-1278.
41.
RuiterR. A. C.KesselsL. T. E.PetersG.-J. G. Y.KokG. (2014). Sixty years of fear appeal research: Current state of the evidence. International Journal of Psychology, 49, 63-70.
42.
Secades-VillaR.OlfsonM.OkudaM.VelasquezN.Pérez-FuentesG.LiuS.-M.BlancoC. (2013). Trends in the prevalence of tobacco use in the United States, 1991–1992 to 2004–2005. Psychiatric Services, 64, 458-465.
43.
SinghA.Owusu-DaboE.BrittonJ.MunafòM. R.JonesL. L. (2014). “Pictures don’t lie, seeing is believing”: Exploring attitudes to the introduction of pictorial warnings on cigarette packs in Ghana. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 16, 1613-1619.
44.
ThrasherJ. F.Abad-ViveroE. N.HuangL.O’ConnorR. J.HammondD.Bansal-TraversM.. . . HardinJ. (2016). Interpersonal communication about pictorial health warnings on cigarette packages: Policy-related influences and relationships with smoking cessation attempts. Social Science & Medicine, 164, 141-149.
45.
ThrasherJ. F.HammondD.FongG. T.Arillo-SantillánE. (2007). Smokers’ reactions to cigarette package warnings with graphic imagery and with only text: A comparison between Mexico and Canada. Salud Publica de Mexico, 49, s233-s240.
46.
WeinbergerA. H.PilverC. E.HoffR. A.MazureC. M.McKeeS. A. (2013). Changes in smoking for adults with and without alcohol and drug use disorders: Longitudinal evaluation in the US population. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 39, 186-193.
47.
WilliamsJ. M.SteinbergM. L.GriffithsK. G.CoopermanN. (2013). Smokers with behavioral health comorbidity should be designated a tobacco use disparity group. American Journal of Public Health, 103, 1549-1555.
