Research suggests that fast life history strategy (LHS) may be a primary driver of substance use among young adults. However, a recent study reported that (a) young adult fast LHS did not subsume all theorized indicators of LHS during this period and (b) fast LHS among parents did not predict young adult fast LHS or liability for use of common substances. In this study, we used structural equations and national data to test whether these findings generalized to adolescence. In addition, given that LHS and substance use share genetic and neuropsychological bases, we examined whether fast LHS could explain the developmental stability of substance use. Overall, our results extend the findings discussed above and suggest that fast LHS fully explains the developmental stability of substance use among youth. We discuss implications for life history models, research applying life history theory and substance use, and substance abuse prevention and treatment.
AgnewR.WhiteH. (1992). An empirical test of general strain theory. Criminology, 30, 475-500.
2.
AndersenS. L. (2003). Trajectories of brain development: Point of vulnerability or window of opportunity?Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 27, 3-18. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(03)00005-8
3.
AndersenS. L.TeicherM. H. (2009). Desperately driven and no brakes: Developmental stress exposure and subsequent risk for substance abuse. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 516-524. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.009
4.
BarnesJ. C.BoutwellB. B.BeaverK. M.GibsonC. L.WrightJ. P. (2014). On the consequences of ignoring genetic influences in criminological research. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 471-482. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.08.003
BernheimA.HalfonO.BoutrelB. (2013). Controversies about the enhanced vulnerability of the adolescent brain to develop addiction. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 4, Article 118. doi:10.3389/fphar.2013.00118
7.
BerridgeK. C. (2007). The debate over dopamine’s role in reward: The case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology, 191, 391-431. doi:10.1007/s00213-006-0578-x
8.
BoisvertD.BoutwellB. B.BarnesJ. C.VaskeJ. (2013). Genetic and environmental influences underlying the relationship between low self-control and substance use. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 262-272. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.05.007
9.
BollenK. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
10.
BrowneM. W.CudeckR. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In BollenK. A.LongJ. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
BrumbachB. H.FigueredoA. J.EllisB. J. (2009). Effects of harsh and unpredictable environments in adolescence on the development of life history strategies: A longitudinal test of an evolutionary model. Human Nature, 20, 25-51. doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9059-3
12.
Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor. (2012). National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 cohort, 1997-2010 (rounds 1-14) [computer file] (Produced by the National Opinion Research Center, the University of Chicago and distributed by the Center for Human Resource Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus). Washington, DC: Author.
13.
BussD. M. (2007). The evolution of human mating. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 502-512.
14.
ByrneB. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
CaldwellB.BradleyR. (1984). Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME)–Revised edition. Little Rock: University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
16.
Cavazos-RehgP. A.KraussM. J.SpitznagelE. L.SchootmanM.CottlerL. B.BierutL. J. (2011). Number of sexual partners and associations with initiation and intensity of substance use. AIDS Behavior, 15, 869-874. doi:10.1007/s10461-010-9669-0
17.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries, 61(4), 1-162. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/ss/ss6104.pdf
18.
ChassinL.ForaD. B.KingK. M. (2004). Trajectories of alcohol and drug use and dependence from adolescence to adulthood: The effects of familial alcoholism and personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 113, 483-498. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.113.4.483
19.
ChassinL.SherK. J.HussongA.CurranP. (2013). The developmental psychopathology of alcohol use and alcohol disorders: Research achievements and future directions. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 1567-1584. doi:10.1017/S0954579413000771
20.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
21.
ChisholmJ. (1993). Death, hope, and sex: Life-history theory and the development of reproductive strategies. Current Anthropology, 34, 1-24. doi:10.1086/204131
22.
CloningerC. R.SigvardssonS.BohmanM. (1996). Type I and type II alcoholism: An update. Alcohol Health and Research World, 20, 18-23.
23.
CoppingL. T.CampbellA.MuncerS. (2014). Psychometrics and life history strategy: The structure and validity of the high K strategy scale. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 200-222.
24.
Del GiudiceM. (2009). Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 32, 1-21. doi:10.1017/S0140525X09000016
25.
Del GiudiceM. (2014). An evolutionary life history framework for psychopathology. Psychological Inquiry, 25, 261-300. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2014.884918
26.
Del GiudiceM.EllisB. J.ShirtcliffE. A. (2011). The adaptive calibration model of stress responsivity. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 1562-1592. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.11.007
27.
DurrantR.AdamsonS.ToddF.SellmanD. (2009). Drug use and addiction: Evolutionary perspective. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 1049-1056. doi:10.3109/00048670903270449
28.
DurrantR.ThakkerJ. (2003). Substance use and abuse: Cultural and historical perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
EllisB. J.FigueredoA. J.BrumbachB. H.SchlomerG. L. (2009). Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk: The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Human Nature, 20, 204-268. doi:10.1007/s12110-009-9063-7
30.
FigueredoA. J.GladdenP. R.BeckC. J. A. (2012). Intimate partner violence and life history strategy. In ShakelfordT. K.GoetzA. T. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of sexual conflict in humans (pp. 72-99). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
FigueredoA. J.VásquezG.BrumbachB. H.SchneiderS. M. R. (2004). The heritability of life history strategy: The K-factor, covitality, and personality. Social Biology, 51, 121-143.
32.
FigueredoA. J.VásquezG.BrumbachB.JacobsS. M.SefcekJ. A.TalI. R.. . . JacobsW. J. (2006). Consilience and life history theory: From genes to brain to reproductive strategy. Developmental Review, 26, 243-275. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.02.002
33.
FloryK.LynamD.MilichR.LeukefeldC.ClaytonR. (2004). Early adolescent through young adult alcohol and marijuana use trajectories: Early predictors, young adult outcomes, and predictive utility. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 193-213. doi:10.1017/S0954579404044475
34.
FreedC. R. (2012). Historical perspectives on addiction. In ShafferH. J.LaPlanteD. A.NelsonS. E. (Eds.), APA addiction syndrome handbook, Vol. 1: Foundations, influences, and expressions of addiction. APA handbooks in psychology (pp. 27-47). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13751-002
35.
FriedmanN. P.MiyakeA.CorleyR. P.YoungS. E.DeFriesJ. C.HewittJ. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17, 172-179. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01681.x
36.
GilbertP. (1998). The evolved basis and adaptive functions of cognitive distortions. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 71, 447-463. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1998.tb01002.x
37.
GoldmanM. S.DarkesJ.ReichR. R.BrandonK. O. (2006). From DNA to conscious thought: The influence of anticipatory mechanisms on alcohol consumption. In MunafòM.AlberyI. P. (Eds.), Cognition + addiction (pp. 31-72). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38.
GoldsteinM. A. (2011). Adolescent substance abuse. In The mass general hospital for children adolescent medicine handbook (Vol. 3, pp. 155-165). doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6845-6_19
39.
GoldsteinR. Z.VolkowN. D. (2002). Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: Neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1642-1652. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.10.1642
40.
GrantJ. E.SchreiberL.HarvankoA. M. (2012). Neurobiology of addiction: Support for a syndrome model of addiction. In ShafferH. J.LaPlanteD. A.NelsonS. E. (Eds.), APA addiction syndrome handbook, Vol. 1: Foundations, influences, and expressions of addiction. APA handbooks in psychology (pp. 121-146). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13751-006
41.
GriskeviciusV.TyburJ. M.DeltonA. W.RobertsonT. E. (2011). The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1015-1026. doi:10.1037/a0022403
42.
HerskindA. M.McGueM.HolmN. V.SörensenT. I.HarvaldB.VaupelJ. W. (1996). The heritability of human longevity: A population-based study of 2872 Danish twin pairs born 1870–1900. Human Genetics, 97, 319-323.
43.
HeymanG. M. (2013). Addiction and choice: Theory and new data. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 4, Article 31. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00031
44.
HillE. M.ChowK. (2002). Life-history theory and risky drinking. Addiction, 97, 401-413. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00020.x
45.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
46.
HummelA.SheltonK. H.HeronJ.MooreL.van den BreeM. (2013). A systematic review of the relationships between family functioning, pubertal timing and adolescent substance use. Addiction, 108, 487-496. doi:10.1111/add.12055
47.
JacobusJ.BavaS.Cohen-ZionM.MahmoodO.TapertS. F. (2009). Functional consequences of marijuana use in adolescents. Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior, 92, 559-565. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2009.04.001
48.
JonesD. N.FigueredoA. J. (2007). Mating effort as a predictor of smoking in a college sample. Current Research in Social Psychology, 12, 186-195.
49.
KirkK. M.BlombergS. P.DuffyD. L.HeathA.OwensI. P.MartinN. G. (2001). Natural selection and quantitative genetics of life-history traits in Western women: A twin study. Evolution, 55, 423-435.
50.
KlineR. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
51.
LiebermanM. D. (2007). The X- and C-systems: The neural basis of automatic and controlled social cognition. In Harmon-JonesE.WinkielmanP. (Eds.), Social neuroscience: Integrating biological and psychological explanations of social behavior (pp. 290-315). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
52.
LittleR.RubinD. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York, NY: John Wiley.
53.
MargaronH. (2004). Pleasure: From onthogenesis to addiction. Substance Use & Misuse, 39, 1423-1434. doi:10.1081/JA-120039399
54.
MerikangasK. R.McClairV. L. (2012). Epidemiology of substance use disorders. Human Genetics, 131, 779-789. doi:10.1007/s00439-012-1168-0
55.
MillerJ. W.NaimiT. S.BrewerR. D.JonesS. E. (2007). Binge drinking and associated health risk behaviors among high school students. Pediatrics, 119, 76-85. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1517
56.
MinkovM.BondM. H. (2015). Genetic polymorphisms predict national differences in life history strategy and time orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 204-215.
57.
MoosR. H. (2006). Social contexts and substance use. In MillerW. R.CarrollK. M. (Eds.), Rethinking substance abuse: What the science shows, and what we should do about it (pp. 182-200). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
58.
MunafòM. E.AlberyI. P. (2006). Cognition + addiction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
59.
MuthénB. O.du ToitS. H. C.SpisicD. (1997). Robust inference using weighted least squares and quadratic estimating equations in latent variable modeling with categorical and continuous outcomes. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/muthen/articles/Article_075.pdf
NedelecJ. L.BeaverK. M. (2014). The relationship between self-control in adolescence and social consequences in adulthood: Assessing the influence of genetic confounds. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 288-298. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.02.002
62.
NesseR. M. (1994). An evolutionary perspective on substance abuse. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 339-348. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(94)90007-8
63.
NesseR. M. (2002). Evolution and addiction. Addiction, 97, 470-471. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00086.x
64.
OlderbakS.GladdenP.WolfP. S. A.FigueredoA. J. (2014). Comparison of life history strategy measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 82-88. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.012
65.
OrlandoM.TuckerJ. S.EllicksonP. L.KleinD. J. (2004). Developmental trajectories of cigarette smoking and their correlates from early adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 400-410.
66.
PatrickM. E.WightmanP.SchoeniR. F.SchulenbergJ. E. (2012). Socioeconomic status and substance use among young adults: A comparison across constructs and drugs. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 772-782.
67.
PearlJ. (2009). Causality. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
PeeleS. (1990). A values approach to addiction: Drug policy that is moral rather than moralistic. Journal of Drug Issues, 20, 639-646. doi:10.1177/002204269002000413
69.
PohlmannJ. T. (2004). Use and interpretation of factor analysis in The Journal of Educational Research: 1992-2002. The Journal of Educational Research, 98, 14-23. doi:10.3200/JOER.98.1.14-23
70.
PompiliM.SerafiniG.InnamoratiM.BiondiM.SiracusanoA.Di GiannantonioM.. . . Möller-LeimkühlerA. M. (2012). Substance abuse and suicide risk among adolescents. European Archives of Psychiatry & Clinical Neuroscience, 262, 469-485. doi:10.1007/s00406-012-0292-0
71.
RedishA. D.JensenS.JohnsonA. (2008). A unified framework for addiction: Vulnerabilities in the decision process. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 31, 415-437. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0800472X
72.
RichardsonG. B.ChenC. C.DaiC. L.HardestyP. H.SwobodaC. M. (2014). Life history strategy and young adult substance use. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 932-957. doi:10.1177/147470491401200506
73.
RichardsonG. B.FreedlanderJ. M.KatzE. C.DaiC. L.ChenC. C. (2014). Impulsivity links reward and threat sensitivities to substance use: A functional model. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1194. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01194
74.
RichardsonG. B.HardestyP. (2012). Immediate survival focus: Synthesizing life history theory and dual process models to explain substance use. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 731-749. doi:10.1177/147470491201000408
75.
RobinsonM. J.RobinsonT. E.BerridgeK. C. (2013). Incentive salience and the transition to addiction. Biological Research on Addiction, 2, 391-399. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-398335-0.00039-x
76.
RushtonJ. P. (1985). Differential K theory: The sociobiology of individual and group differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 441-452. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90137-0
77.
RushtonJ. P.JensenA. R. (2005). Thirty years of research on race differences in cognitive ability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 235-294. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.235
78.
SchaferJ. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London, England: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
79.
SchafferH. J.LaPlanteD. A.LaBrieR. A.KidmanR. C.DonatoA. N.StantonM. V. (2004). Toward a syndrome model of addiction: Multiple expressions, common etiology. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 12, 367-374. doi:10.1080/10673220490905705
80.
StaigerP. K.KambouropoulosN.DaweS. (2007). Should personality traits be considered when refining substance misuse treatment programs?Drug and Alcohol Review, 26, 17-23. doi:10.1080/09595230601036952
81.
SteinJ. A.NewcombM. D.BentlerP. M. (1987). Personality and drug use: Reciprocal effects across four years. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 419-430. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(87)90043-2
82.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). Results from the 2011 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of national findings (NSDUH Series H-48, HHS Publication No. [SMA] 14-4863). Rockville, MD: Author.
TarterR. E.HornerM.RidenourT. (2012). Developmental perspective of substance use disorder etiology. In APA addiction syndrome handbook, Vol. 1: Foundations, influences, and expressions of addiction. APA handbooks in psychology (pp. 261-287). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/13751-014
85.
TeicherM. H.AndersenS. L.PolcariA.AndersonC. M.NavaltaC. P.KimD. M. (2003). The neurobiological consequences of early stress and childhood maltreatment. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 27, 33-44. doi:10.1016/S0149-7634(03)00007-1
86.
TerraccianoA.LöckenhoffC. E.CrumR. M.BienvenuO. J.CostaP. T. (2008). Five-Factor Model personality profiles of drug users. BMC Psychiatry, 8(1), Article 22. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-8-22
87.
ThornberryT. P.KrohnM. D.Freeman-GallantA. (2006). International roots of early onset substance use. Journal of Drug Issues, 36, 1-27. doi:10.1177/002204260603600101
88.
TriversR. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In CampbellB. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136-179). Chicago, IL: Aldine.
89.
van HonkJ.SchutterD. (2007). Vigilant and avoidant responses to angry facial expressions: Dominance and submission motives. In Harmon-JonesE.WinkielmanP. (Eds.), Social neuroscience: Integrating biological and psychological explanations of social behavior (pp. 197-223). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
90.
VanyukovM. M.KirisciL.TarterR. E.SimkevitzH. F.KirillovaG. P.MaherB. S.ClarkD. B. (2003). Liability to substance use disorders: 2. A measurement approach. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 27, 517-526. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.08.003
91.
VanyukovM. M.TarterR. E.KirillovaG. P.KirisciL.ReynoldsM. D.KreekM. J.. . . RidenourT. A. (2012). Common liability to addiction and “gateway hypothesis”: Theoretical, empirical and evolutionary perspective. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 123, S3-S17. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.12.018
92.
VanyukovM. M.TarterR. E.KirisciL.KirillovaG. P.MaherB. S.ClarkD. B. (2003). Liability to substance use disorders: 1. Common mechanisms and manifestations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 27, 507-515. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.08.002
93.
VolkowN. D.FowlerJ. S.WangG. J.SwansonJ. M. (2004). Dopamine in drug abuse and addiction: Results from imaging studies and treatment implications. Molecular Psychiatry, 9, 557-569. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001507
94.
VolkowN. D.FowlerJ. S.WangG.SwansonJ. M.TelangF. (2007). Dopamine in drug abuse and addiction: Results of imaging studies and treatment implications. Archives of Neurology, 64, 1575-1579. doi:10.1001/archneur.64.11.1575
95.
YucelM.LubmanD. I.SolowijN.BrewerW. J. (2007). Understanding drug addiction: A neuropsychological perspective. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 41, 957-968. doi:10.1080/00048670701689444
