This study has two primary goals. First, we seek to identify common demographic characteristics and risk factors among adolescent methamphetamine (MA) users, and second, to determine factors that predict MA use among adolescents. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed on data gathered from a 2010 Midwestern state survey administered to 33,364 middle and high school students. Results indicate that typical adolescent MA users are male, identify racially as “Other,” and are high school upperclassmen. Individual and community risk factors were found to be statistically significant in predicting MA use among adolescents. Specifically, high individual risk level increased the odds of MA use by roughly 9%, and higher community risk-level scores increased the odds by about 3%. Findings suggest that drug prevention efforts should focus attention on adolescent attitudes regarding health consequences and social acceptability of drug use as well as provide afterschool programs/clubs to adolescents.
AgnewR. (1991). The interaction effects of peer variables on delinquency. Criminology, 29, 47-72.
2.
AkersR. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure, a general theory of crime and deviance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
3.
AkersR. L.LeeG. (1999). Age, social learning, and social learning in adolescent substance use. Deviant Behavior, 19, 1-25.
4.
AkersR. L.SellersC. S. (2001). Criminological theories: Introduction, evaluation, and application. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
Baskin-SommersA.SommersI. (2006). Methamphetamine use and violence among young adults. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 661-674.
6.
BrechtM.O’BrienA.von MaurhauserC.AnglinM. D. (2004). Methamphetamine use behaviors and gender differences. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 89-106.
7.
CallaghanR. C.TavaresJ.TaylorL.VeldhuizenS. (2007). A national survey of primary methamphetamine-related admissions to youth residential substance abuse treatment facilities in Canada, 2005 to 2006. Le revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 52, 684-688.
8.
CartierJ.FarabeeD.PendergastM. L. (2006). Methamphetamine use, self-reported violent crime, and recidivism among offenders in California who abuse drugs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21, 435-445.
9.
ChartierM.AranetaA.DucaL.McGlynnL. M.Gore-FeltonC.GoldblumP.KoopmanC. (2009). Personal values and meaning in the use of methamphetamine among HIV-positive men who have sex with men. Qualitative Health Research, 31, 504-518.
10.
GassmanR.NowickeC. E.JunM. K. (2010). Individual characteristics of adolescent methamphetamine users in relation to self-reported trouble with police. Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 54, 76-92.
11.
HavensJ. R.YoungA. M.HavensC. E. (2011). Nonmedical prescription drug use in a nationally representative sample of adolescents: Evidence of greater use among rural adolescents. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 165, 250-255.
12.
Herman-StahlM. A.KrebsC. P.KroutilL. A.HellerD. C. (2007). Risk and protective factors for methamphetamine use and nonmedical use of prescription stimulants among young adults aged 18 to 25. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 1003-1015.
13.
HerzD. C. (2000). Drugs in the heartland: Methamphetamine use in rural Nebraska. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
14.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkley: University of California Press.
15.
HopferC.MendelsonB.Van LeeuwenJ. M.KellyS.HooksS. (2006). Club drug use among youths in treatment for substance abuse. The American Journal on Addictions, 15, 94-99.
16.
IritaniB. J.HallforsD.BauerD. J. (2007). Crystal methamphetamine use among young adults in the USA. Addiction, 102, 1102-1113.
17.
JacobyL. S. (2012). Huffers and huffing: A study of inhalant use among Nebraska youth (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Nebraska, Omaha.
18.
JensenK. L. R.TheronL. (2006). Ecstasy (MDMA), methamphetamine, and date rape (drug-facilitated sexual assault): A consideration of issues. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 38(1), 1-12.
19.
JohnstonL. D.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.SchulenbergJ. E. (2010). Monitoring the Future: National survey results on drug use, 1975–2009—Volume I, Secondary school students (NIH Publication No. 10-7584). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
20.
JohnstonL. D.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.SchulenbergJ. E. (2012). Monitoring the Future: National survey results on drug use, 1975–2011—Volume I, Secondary school students. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
21.
KierkusC. A.BaerD. (2002). A social control explanation of the relationship between family structure and delinquent behaviour. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 44, 425-458.
22.
LiangL.HuangD.BrechtM.HserY. (2009). Differences in mortality among heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamine users: A hierarchical and Bayesian approach. Journal of Drug Issues, 22, 121-140.
23.
MiuraH.FujikiM.ShibataA.IshikawaK. (2006). Prevalence and profile of methamphetamine users in adolescents at a juvenile classification home. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 60, 352-357.
24.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2002). Research report series: Marijuana abuse (National Institute of Health Publication No. 10-3859). Bethesda, MD.
25.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2013). Research report series: Methamphetamine abuse and addiction (National Institute of Health Publication No. 13-4210). Bethesda, MD .
26.
NisbettR. E.RossL. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings in social judgment. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
27.
OettingE. R.DeffensbacherJ. L.TaylorM. J.LutherN.BeauvaisF.EdwardsR. W. (2000). Methamphetamine use by high school students: Recent trends, gender and ethnicity differences, and use of other drugs. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 10, 33-50.
28.
Office of National Drug Control Policy. (1999). Methamphetamine. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
29.
Office of National Drug Control Policy. (2009). ADAM II: 2008 annual report. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
30.
Office of National Drug Control Policy. (2010). Methamphetamine trends in the United States. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
31.
PayneA. A.SolottiS. (2007). A comparative analysis of social learning and social control theories in the prediction of college crime. Deviant Behavior, 28, 553-573.
32.
PennellS.EllettJ.RienickC.GrimesJ. (1999). Meth matters: Report on methamphetamine users in five western cities. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
33.
PrattT. C.CullenF. T.SellersC. S.WinfreeL. T.Jr.MadensenT. D.DaigleL.. . .GauJ. M. (2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27, 765-802.
34.
PruittL. R. (2009). The forgotten fifth: Rural youth and substance abuse. Stanford Law and Policy Review, 20, 259-304.
35.
RhewI. C.HawkinsJ. D.OesterleS. (2011). Drug use and risk among youth in different rural contexts. Health Place, 17, 775-783.
36.
RoehrichL.MeilW.SimanskyJ.DavisW.Jr.DunneR. (2007). Substance abuse in rural Pennsylvania: Present and future. Harrisburg: Center for Rural Pennsylvania.
37.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1994). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
SattahM. V.SupawitkulS.DonderoT. J.KilmarxP. H.YoungN. L.MastroT. D.. . .van GriensvenF. (2002). Prevalence of and risk factors for methamphetamine use in northern Thai youth: Results of an audio-computer-assisted self-interviewing survey with urine testing. Addiction, 97, 801-808.
39.
SchepisT. S.DesaiR. A.CavalloD. A.SmithA. E.McFetridgeA.LissT. B.. . .Krishnan-SarinS. (2011). Gender differences in adolescent marijuana use and associated psychosocial characteristics. Journal of Addiction Medicine, 5, 65-73.
40.
SchulteM. T.RamoD.BrownS. A. (2009). Gender differences in factors influencing alcohol use and drinking progression among adolescents. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 535-547.
41.
SmangsM. (2010). Delinquency, social skills, and peer relations. Social Forces, 89, 609-632.
42.
SommersI.BaskinD.Baskin-SommersA. (2006). Methamphetamine use among young adults: Health and social consequences. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 1469-1476.
43.
SpothR. L.ClairS.ShinC.RedmondC. (2006). Long-term effects of universal preventive interventions on methamphetamine use among adolescents. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 160, 876-882.
44.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2010). Results from the 2009 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Volume I. Summary of national findings. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA]. (2010). A day in the life of American adolescents: Substance use facts update. Retrieved from http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/2k10/185/185TypicalDayHTML.pdf
47.
WallaceJ. M.Jr.BachmanJ. G.O’MalleyP. M.JohnstonL. D.SchulenbergJ. E.CooperS. M. (2002). Tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use: Racial and ethnic differences among US high school seniors, 1976–2000. Public Health Reports, 117(Suppl. 1), S67-S75.
48.
WoodE.StoltzJ.ZhangR.StrathdeeS. A.MontanerJ. S. G.KerrT. (2008). Circumstances of first crystal methamphetamine use and initiation of injection drug use among high-risk youth. Drug and Alcohol Review, 27, 270-276.
49.
WrightS.KleeH. (2001). Violent crime, aggression and amphetamine: What are the implications for drug treatment services?Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 8, 73-89.
