This research presents the results of the evaluation of the Breaking the Cycle (BTC) demonstration project in Jacksonville, FL and Tacoma, WA. The BTC demonstration project tested the feasibility and impact of system-wide intervention designed to reduce drug use among offenders. Specifically, the BTC model was designed to identify drug using felony defendants and then apply a combination of drug testing linked to graduated sanctions and drug treatment to promote abstinence among these defendants. The evaluation of BTC revealed that certain elements of the intervention might not be feasible. However, the results of the quasi-experimental impact evaluation discovered that, in spite of partial program implementation, participation in BTC was associated with reductions in criminal behavior.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnglinD. M.LongshoreD.TurnerS.1999Treatment alternatives to street crime: An evaluation of five programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior,26, 168–195
2.
BiglanA.HoodD.BrozovskyP.OchsL.AryD.BlackC.1991Subject attrition in prevention research. In LeukefeldC. G.BukoskiW. J. (Eds.), Drug abuse prevention intervention research methodological issues. NIDA Research Monograph 107. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse
3.
BrittC. L.IIIGottfredsonM. R.GoldkampJ.1992Drug testing and pre-trial misconduct: An experiment on the specific deterrent effects of drug monitoring defendants on pretrial release. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency,29, 62–78
4.
FalkinG. P.1993Coordinating drug treatment for offenders: A case study.New York: National Develop and Research Institutes, Inc.
5.
GoldkampJ.JonesP. R.WeilandD.GottfredsonM. R.1990Measuring the impact of drug testing at the pretrial release stage: Experimental findings from Prince George's County and Milwaukee County.Philadelphia, PA: Crime and Justice Research Institute
6.
HarrellA.AdamsW.GouvisC.1994Evaluation of the impact of system-wide drug testing in Multnomah County, Oregon.Cambridge, MA: Botec Analysis Corporation
7.
HarrellA.CavanaghS.RomanJ.1999Final report: Findings from the evaluation of the D.C. Superior Court Drug Intervention Program.Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute
8.
HarrellA.HirstA. M.MitchellO.2000Implementing system-wide interventions for drug-involved offenders in Jacksonville, Florida: Evaluation of the Breaking the Cycle demonstration.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute
9.
HarrellA.MitchellO.HirstA. M.2000Implementing system-wide interventions for drug-involved offenders in Pierce County, Washington: Evaluation of the Breaking the Cycle demonstration.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute
10.
HarrellA.MitchellO.HirstA.MarloweD.MerrillJ.2002Breaking of cycle of drugs and crime: Findings from the Birmingham BTC demonstration. Criminology & Public Policy,1, 187–216
11.
HarrellA.MitchellO.MerrillJ.MarloweD.2002Evaluation of Breaking the Cycle.Washington, DC: The Urban Institute
12.
HarrellA.RomanJ.2001Reducing drug use and crime among offenders: The impact of graduated sanctions. Journal of Drug Issues,31, 207–232
13.
HeckmanJ. J.1978Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica,46, 931–959
14.
McLellanA. T.KushnerH.MetzgerD.PetersR.SmithI.GrissomG.1992The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment,9, 199–213
15.
MitchellO.MacKenzieD. L.WilsonD. B. (Forthcoming) The effectiveness of incarceration-based drug treatment on offending and drug use. In FarringtonD. P.WelshB. C. (Editors), Preventing crime: What works for children, offenders, victims, and places.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
16.
RomanJ.TownsendW.BhatiA. S.2003Recidivism rates for drug court graduates: Nationally based estimates, final report.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice
17.
SmithD. A.PaternosterR.1990Formal processing and future delinquency: Deviance amplification as selection artifact. Law & Society Review,24, 1109–1131
18.
19.
WinshipC.MareR. D.1992Models for sample selection bias. Annual Review of Sociology,18, 327–50
20.
WinshipC.MorganS. L.1999The estimation of causal effects from observational data. Annual Review of Sociology,25, 659–707
