Since the 1990s, marijuana has been the drug of choice among American youths, especially those that tend to sustain arrests. Previous birth cohorts had greater use of crack, powder cocaine, or heroin. This paper summarizes prior research that strongly suggests drug eras tend to follow a regular course. These insights then serve as the basis for projecting trends in marijuana use both for the general population nationwide and for Manhattan arrestees. To the extent that current trends persist, the prospects for the “Marijuana/Blunts Generation” (born 1970 and later) may be relatively good. These young persons may successfully avoid “hard drugs” as well as the attendant health, social, and legal problems for their entire life, but they may experience higher levels of smoking-related ailments. The conclusion presents issues for continued drug surveillance and ethnographic research to more accurately understand the Marijuana/Blunts Era and to provide an indicator of future changes as they occur.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM)20032000 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring: Annual report. NCJ 193013. Washington, D.C.: National Institutes of Justice. Retrieved April 8, 2004, from www.adam-nij.net
2.
AlwinD.F.McCammonR.J.2003Generations, cohorts and social change. In MortimerJ.T.ShanahanM.J. (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 23–49). New York: Kluwer
3.
ArnettJ.J.2000Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist,55 (5), 469–480
4.
BachmanJ.G.WadsworthK.N.O'MalleyP.M.JohnstonL.D.SchulenbergJ.E.1997Smoking, drinking and drug use in young adulthood: The impacts of new freedoms and new responsibilities.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
5.
BeckerH.S.1963Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance.Free Press, New York
6.
BeckerH.S.1967History, culture, and subjective experience: An exploration of the social bases of drug-induced experience. Journal of Health and Social Behavior,8, 163–176
7.
BlumsteinA.WallmanJ. (Eds.). 2000The crime drop in America.New York: Cambridge
8.
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)1999Youth use of cigars: Patterns of use and perceptions of risk.Washington, DC: DHHS
9.
DuncanG.J.Brooks-GunnJ. (Eds.) 1997Consequences of growing up poor.New York: Russell Sage
10.
ElderG.H.1999Children of the great depression: Social change in life experience, 25th anniversary edition. Boulder, CO: Westview
11.
12.
FeldmanA.L.SullivanJ.T.PasseroM.A.LewisD.C.1993Pneumothorax in polysubstance-abusing marijuana and tobacco smokers: Three cases. Journal of Substance Abuse,5, 183–86
13.
FeuchtT.E.KyleG.M.1996Methamphetamine use among adult arrestees: findings from the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) Program. National Institute of Justice Research in brief, NCJ 161842. Retrieved April 8, 2004, from www.adam-nij.net
14.
FiliegelS.E.RothM.D.KleerupE.C.BarskyS.H.SimmonsM.S.TashkinD.P.1997Tracheobronchial histopathology in habitual smokers of cocaine, marijuana, and/or tobacco. Chest, 112, 319–26
15.
General Accounting Office (GAO)1998Emerging drug problems: Despite changes in detection and response capability, concerns remain. GAO/HEHS-98–130
16.
GfroererJ.C.EpsteinJ.F.1999Marijuana initiates and their impact on future drug abuse treatment need. Drug and Alcohol Dependence,54, 229–237
17.
GfroererJ.C.WuL.T.PenneM.A.2002Initiation of marijuana use: Trends, patterns, and implications. (Analytic Series: A-17, DHHS Publication No. SMA 02–2711). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies
18.
GolubA.JohnsonB.D.1994Cohort differences in drug use pathways to crack among current crack abusers in New York City. Criminal Justice and Behavior,21 (4), 403–422
19.
GolubA.JohnsonB.D.1996The crack epidemic: Empirical findings support a hypothesized diffusion of innovation process. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,30 (3), 221–231
20.
GolubA.JohnsonB.D.1997Crack's decline: Some surprises across U.S. cities. National Institute of Justice Research in brief, NCJ 165707. Retrieved April 8, 2004, from www.adam-nij.net
21.
GolubA.JohnsonB.D.1999Cohort changes in illegal drug use among arrestees in Manhattan: From the heroin injection generation to the blunts generation. Substance Use and Misuse,34 (13), 1733–1763
22.
GolubA.JohnsonB.D.2001aVariation in youthful risk of progression from alcohol/tobacco to marijuana and hard drugs across generations. American Journal of Public Health,91 (2), 225–232
23.
GolubA.JohnsonB.D.2001bThe rise of marijuana as the drug of choice among youthful arrestees. National Institute of Justice Research in Brief, NCJ 187490. Retrieved April 8, 2004, from www.adam-nij.net
24.
GolubA.JohnsonB.D.2002The misuse of the ‘gateway theory’ in U.S. policy on drug abuse control: A secondary analysis of the muddled deduction. International Journal of Drug Policy,13 (1), 5–19
25.
GolubA.JohnsonB.D.2004The new heroin users among Manhattan arrestees: Variations by race/ethnicity and mode of consumption. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, forthcoming
26.
GolubA.JohnsonB.D.LabouvieE.2000On correcting biases in self-reports of age at first substance use with repeated cross-section analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology,16 (1), 45–68
27.
GolubA.JohnsonB.D.SifaneckS.J.CheslukB.ParkerH.2001Is the U.S. experiencing an incipient epidemic of hallucinogen use?Substance Use and Misuse,36 (12), 1699–1729
28.
GolubA.JohnsonB.D.TaylorA.LibertyH.2002The validity of arrestees' self-reports: Variations across questions and persons. Justice Quarterly,19 (3), 101–126
29.
GongH.Jr.FiliegelS.TashkinD.P.BarbersR.G.1987Tracheobronchial changes in habitual, heavy smokers of marijuana with and without tobacco. American Review of Respiratory Disease,136, 142–9
30.
GrinspoonL.BakalarJ.B.1997Marihuana. In LowinsonJ.H.RuizP.MillmanR.B.LangrodJ.G. (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook (4th ed., pp. 199–206). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins
31.
HamidA.1992The developmental cycle of a drug epidemic: The cocaine-smoking epidemic of 1981–1991. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs,24 (4), 337–348
32.
HamidA.CurtisR.McCoyK.McGuireJ.CondeA.BushellW.LindenmayerR.BrimbergK.MaiaS.Abdur-RashidS.SettembrinoJ.1997The heroin epidemic in New York City: Current status and prognoses. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs,29 (4), 375–391
33.
HarrisonL.1997The validity of self-reported drug use in survey research: An overview and critique of research methods. In HarrisonL.HughesA. (Eds.), The validity of self reported drug use: Improving the accuracy of survey estimates. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph 167 (pp. 17–36). Washington, DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse
34.
HartmanD.GolubA.L.1999The social construction of the crack epidemic in the print media. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs,31 (4), 423–433
35.
HuntD.RhodesW.2001Methodology guide for ADAM.Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved April 8, 2004, from www.adam-nij.net
36.
HuntL.G.ChambersC.D.1976The heroin epidemics: A study of heroin use in the U.S., part 2, 1965–75.Holliswood, NY: Spectrum
37.
Institute of Medicine (IOM).1999Marijuana and medicine: Assessing the science base.Washington, DC: National Academy Press
38.
JohnsonB.D.GolubA.2002Generational trends in heroin use and injection among arrestees in New York City. In MustoD.F. (Ed.), One hundred years of heroin (pp. 91–128). Westport, CT: Auburn House
39.
JohnsonB.D.GolubA.DunlapE.2000The rise and decline of hard drugs, drug markets and violence in New York City. In BlumsteinA.WallmanJ. (Eds.), The crime drop in America (pp. 164–206). New York: Cambridge
40.
JohnsonB.D.MufflerJ.1997Sociocultural. In LowinsonJ.RuizP.MillmanR.LangrodJ. (Eds.), Substance abuse: A comprehensive textbook (3rd ed., pp. 107–117). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins
41.
JohnsonL.D.O'MalleyP.M.BachmanJ.G.2002Monitoring the future: National survey results on drug use, 1975–2001, Vol. 1: Secondary school students. NIH Publication No. 02–5106. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes on Drug Abuse
42.
JohnstonL.D.1991Toward a theory of drug epidemics. In DonohewD.H.SypherH.BukoskiW. (Eds.), Persuasive communication and drug abuse prevention (pp. 93–132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
43.
JonnesJ.2002Hip to be high: Heroin and popular culture in the twentieth century. In MustoD.F. (Ed.), One hundred years of heroin (pp. 227–236). Westport, CT: Auburn House
44.
KandelD.B.1978Convergence in prospective longitudinal surveys of drug use in normal populations. In KandelD.B. (Ed.), Longitudinal research on drug use: Empirical findings and methodological issues (pp. 3–38). Washington: Hemisphere
45.
KandelD.B. (Ed.). 2002Stages and pathways of drug involvement: Examining the gateway hypothesis.New York: Cambridge
46.
KorperS.P.CouncilC. L. (Eds.) 2002Substance use by older adults: Estimates of future impact on the treatment system. DHHS Publication No. SMA −3–3763, Analytic Series A-21. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services
47.
MaguraS.KangS.Y.1996Validity of self-reported drug use in high risk populations: A meta-analytical review. Substance Use and Misuse,31 (9), 1131–1153
48.
MorralA.R.McCaffreyD.F.PaddockS.M.2002Reassessing the marijuana gateway effect. Addiction,97, 1493–1504
49.
MustoD.F.1987The American disease: Origins of narcotic control.New York, Oxford
50.
MustoD.F.1993The rise and fall of epidemics: Learning from history. In,EdwardsG.StrangJ.JaffeJ.H. (Eds.), Drugs, alcohol, and tobacco: Making the science and policy connections.New York: Oxford
51.
National Institute of Justice (NIJ)1997Drug Use Forecasting: Annual report on adult and juvenile arrestees, 1996.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice
52.
NewmanK.1996Ethnography, biography, and cultural history: Generational paradigms in human development. In JessorR.ColbyA.ShwederR.A. (Eds.), Ethnography and human development: Context and meaning in social inquiry (pp. 371–393). Chicago: Chicago
53.
OettingE.R.DonnermeyerJ.F.1998Primary socialization theory: The etiology of drug use and deviance. I. Substance Use and Misuse,33 (4), 995–1026
54.
OrcuttJ. D.TurnerJ. B.1993Shocking numbers and graphic accounts: Quantified images of drug problems in the print media. Social Problems,40, 190–206
55.
ReinarmanC.LevineH.G.1997Crack in context: America's latest demon drug. In ReinarmanC.LevineH.G. (Eds.), Crack in America: Demon drugs and social justice (pp. 1–17). Berkeley: California
56.
RogersE.M.1995Diffusion of innovations, fourth edition.New York: Free Press
57.
ShermanM.P.CampbellL.A.GongH. Jr.RothM.D.TashkinD.P.1991Antimicrobial and respiratory burst characteristics of pulmonary alveolar macrophages recovered from smokers of marijuana alone, smokers of tobacco alone, smokers of marijuana and tobacco, and nonsmokers. American Review of Respiratory Disease,144, 1351–6
58.
ShryockH.S.SiegelJ.S.Associates.1976The methods and materials of demography. Condensed edition by StockwellE.G.. San Diego: Academic
59.
SifaneckS.J.KaplanC.D.DunlapE.JohnsonB.D.2004Blunts and blowtjes: Cannabis use practices in two cultural settings and their implications for secondary prevention. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology,31 (1), 1–11
60.
SilvermanE.B.1999NYPD battles crime: Innovative strategies in policing.Northeastern: Boston
61.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA)1996The development and implementation of a new data collection instrument for the 1994 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse.Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 96–3084. Retrieved April 8, 2004, from www.samhsa.gov
62.
SAMHSA2002a2000 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Public use file codebook, main study. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 01–3514. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved April 8, 2004, from www.icpsr.umich.edu
63.
SAMHSA2002bResults from the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Vol. 1: Summary of national findings. DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 02–3758. Rockville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved April 8, 2004, from www.samhsa.gov
64.
WrightD.GfroererJ.EpsteinJ.1997The use of external data sources and ratio estimation to improve estimates of hardcore drug use from the NHSDA. In HarrisonL.HughesA. (Eds.), The validity of self-reported drug use: Improving the accuracy of survey estimates, NIDA Research Monograph 167, NIH Publication No. 97–4147 (pp. 477–497). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse
65.
ZimmerL.MorganJ.P.1997Marijuana myths marijuana facts: A review of the scientific evidence.New York: The Lindesmith Center
