Despite the hypothesized link between the stability of drug markets and violence, drug market stability has yet to be operationally defined. Our aim in this paper is to demonstrate the need for reliable and valid measures of drug market stability and to test preliminary measures of market stability using existing data. Using calendar year 2000 data from interviews with 1,440 respondents from the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) program in four cities (Manhattan, Chicago, Portland, and San Diego), we illustrate that it is possible to operationally define the relative stability of these illegal markets. Capitalizing on the existence of comparable data collected from arrestee respondents in the same four cities in 1995, we illustrate how researchers might measure change in market stability over time and space. Our illustrations using these data suggest that drug market stability is not a simple and singular phenomenon, but rather a complex concept requiring multiple measures to elucidate.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AttingerJ.1990The decline of New York. Time, September 17, 1990, pp. 36–52.
2.
BellC.NewbyH.1972Community studies–An introduction to the sociology of the local community. New York: Praeger.
3.
BlumsteinA.1995Youth violence, guns, and the illicit-drug industry. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. NCJ 162687.
4.
BlumsteinA.WallmanJ.2000The crime drop in America. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BrownsteinH.H.2000Drug distribution and sales as a work system. In FaupelC.RomanP.M. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and deviant behavior–-Volume four: Self destructive behavior and disvalued identity (pp. 224–227). Philadelphia and London: Taylor and Francis.
6.
BrownsteinH.H.1996The rise and fall of a violent crime wave–-Crack cocaine and the social construction of a crime problem. Guilderland, NY: Harrow and Heston.
7.
BrownsteinH.H.1991The media and the construction of random drug violence. Social Justice, 18, 85–103.
8.
BrownsteinH.H.CrimminsS.M.SpuntB.J.2000A conceptual framework for operationalizing the relationship between violence and drug market stability. Contemporary Drug Problems, 27, 867–890.
9.
BrownsteinH.H.BaxiH.R.S.GoldsteinP.J.RyanP.J.1992The relationship of drugs, drug trafficking, and drug traffickers to homicide. Journal of Crime and Justice, 15, 25–44.
10.
ButterfieldF.1997Number of victims of crime fell again in ‘96, study says: Lowest level since reports began in 1973. The New York Times, Nov. 16, 1997, at I18.
11.
ChaikenJ.M.ChaikenM.R.1993Understanding the Drug Use Forecasting (DUF) sample of adult arrestees. Prepared for the National Institute of Justice.
12.
CurtisR.1998The improbable transformation of inner-city neighborhoods: Crime, violence, drugs and youth in the 1990s. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 1233–1276.
13.
CurtisR.SviridoffM.1994The social organization of street-level drug markets and its impact on the displacement effect. In McNamaraR.P. (Ed.), Crime displacement: The other side of prevention. East Rockaway, NY: Cummings and Hathaway.
14.
DemboR.WilliamsL.WothkeW.SchmeidlerJ.GetreuA.BerryE.WishE.D.ChristensenC.1990The relationship between cocaine use, drug sales, and other delinquency among a cohort of high risk youth. In de la RosaM.LambertE.Y.GropperB. (Eds.), Drugs and violence: Causes, correlates, and consequences (pp. 112–135). NIDA Research Monograph No. 103. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
15.
FaganJ.ChinK.L.1990Violence as regulation and social control in the distribution of crack. In de la RosaM.LambertE.Y.GropperB. (Eds.), Drugs and violence: Causes, correlates, and consequences (pp. 8–34). NIDA Research Monograph No. 103. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
16.
FaganJ.WexlerS.1987Family origins of violent delinquents. Criminology, 25, 643–69.
17.
GoldsteinP.J.BrownsteinH.H.RyanP.J.1992Drug-related homicide in New York: 1984 and 1988. Crime and Delinquency, 38, 459–476.
18.
GoldsteinP.J.BrownsteinH.H.RyanP.J.BellucciP.A.1989Crack and homicide in New York City: A conceptually based event analysis. Contemporary Drug Problems, 4, 651–87.
19.
GolubA.JohnsonB.1997Crack's decline: Some surprises across U.S. cities. Research in Brief. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice. NCJ 165707.
20.
GoodeE.1999Drugs in American society (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Hindelang Criminal Justice Research Center2001Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics, 2000. NCJ190251. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
23.
HuntD.RhodesW.2001Methodology guide for ADAM. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
24.
InciardiJ.A.2002The war on drugs III. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
25.
InciardiJ.A.HorowitzR.PottiegerA.E.1993Street kids, street drugs, street crime: An examination of drug use and serious delinquency in Miami. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
26.
JacobsB.A.1999Dealing crack – The social world of streetcorner selling. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
27.
JohnsonB.GoldsteinP.PrebleE.SchmeidlerJ.LiptonD.SpuntB.MillerT.1985Taking care of business: The economics of crime by heroin abusers. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.
28.
JohnsonB.D.HamidA.SanbriaH.1992Emerging models of crack distribution. In MieczkowskiT.. (Ed.), Drugs, crime, and social policy research, issues, and concerns (pp. 56–78). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
29.
KaplanA.1964The conduct of inquiry – Methodology for behavioral science. San Francisco: Chandler.
30.
LattimoreP.K.TrudeauJ.RileyK.J.LeiterJ.EdwardsS.1997Homicide in eight cities: Trends, context, and policy implications. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.
31.
LazarsfeldP.F.RosenbergM.1955The language of social research – A reader in the methodology of social research. New York: Free Press.
32.
MassingM.1989Crack's destructive sprint across America. New York Times Magazine. October 1, 38, 40–1, 58, 60, 62.
33.
MaxfieldM. G.BabbieE.1998Research methods for criminal justice and criminology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
34.
National Institute of Justice20001999 annual report on drug use among adult and juvenile arrestees. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
35.
ReuterP.MacCounR.MurphyP.1990Money from crime – A Study of the economics of drug dealing in Washington, D.C. Santa Monica: Rand Drug Policy Research Center.
36.
RileyK.J.1997Crack, powder cocaine and heroin: drug purchases and use patterns in six U.S. Cities. National Institute of Justice, Office of National Drug Control Policy, Washington, DC.
37.
ReuterP.MacCounR.MurphyP.1990Money from crime – A study of the economics of drug dealing in Washington, D.C. Santa Monica: RAND Drug Policy Research Center.
38.
ShawC.R.McKayH.D.1942Juvenile Delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
SkolnickJ.H.CorrelT.NavarroE.RabbR.1990The social structure of street drug dealing. American Journal of Police, 9, 1–42.
40.
SmithM.E.SviridoffM.SaddS.CurtisR.GrincR.1992The neighborhood effects of street-level drug enforcement-tactical narcotics teams in New York - An evaluation of TNT. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
41.
SviridoffM.HillsmanS.T.1994Assessing the community effects of tactical narcotics teams. In MacKenzieD.L.UchidaC.D. (Eds.), Drugs and crime: Evaluating public policy initiatives (pp. 114–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
TaylorB.T.FitzgeraldN.HuntD.ReardonJ.A.BrownsteinH.H.2001ADAM preliminary 2000 findings on drug use and drug markets – Adult male arrestees. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
43.
TonniesF.1957Community and Society. Tr. and ed. by LoomisC.P.. New York: Harper & Row. (Originally published in German as Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, 1887.).
44.
Webster's1997Webster's II new collegiate dictionary. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.
45.
WendelT.CurtisR.2000The heraldry of heroin: Dope stamps and the dynamics of drug markets in New York City. Journal of Drug Issues, 30, 225–260.
46.
WilliamsT.1992Crackhouse: Notes from the end of the line. New York: Penguin Books.
47.
WitkinG.1991The men who created crack. U.S. News and World Report. August: 44–53.
