AquilinoW.Lo SciutoL.1990Interview mode effects in drug use surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 54, 362–95.
2.
BachmanJ.JohnstonL.O'MalleyP.1996The Monitoring the Future Project after twenty-two years: Design and procedures. Monitoring the Future Occasional Paper 38. Ann Arbor, ML: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
3.
BeckerG.BakalD.1970Subject anonymity and motivational distortion in self-report data. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 207–209.
4.
Bradburn, N., Sudman, S. & Associates1979Improving interview method and questionnaire design. San Francisco, CA.: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention1998Youth risk behavior surveillance – United States, 1997. CDC Surveillance Summaries, 47, -3.
6.
FullerC.1974Effect of anonymity on return rate and response bias in a mail survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 292–306.
7.
GfroererJ.WrightD.KopsteinA.1997Prevalence of youth substance use: The impact of methodological differences between two national surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 47, 19–30.
8.
HorvitzD.ShahB.SimmonsW.1967The unrelated question randomized response model. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association. Washington, D.C.: American Statistical Association.
9.
JohnstonL.O'MalleyP.BachmanJ.1998National survey results on drug use from The Monitoring the Future Study, 1975–1997, Volume 1. Secondary School Students. Rockville, MD.: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
10.
JohnstonL.O'MalleyP.1985Issues of validity and population coverage in student surveys of drug use. In RouseB.A.KozelN.J.RichardsL.G. (Eds.), Self-report methods of estimating drug-use: Meeting current challenges to validity. NIDA Research Monograph, 57. Rockville, MD.: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
11.
KandelD.1975Reaching the hard to reach: Illicit drug use among high school absentees. Addictive Diseases, 1, 465–80.
12.
KingF.1970Anonymous versus identifiable questionnaires in drug usage surveys. American Psychologist, 25, 982–985.
13.
NeedleR.McCubbinH.LorenceJ.HochhauserM.1983Reliability and validity of adolescent self-reported drug use in a family based study: A methodological report. International Journal of Addiction18, 901–12.
14.
Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration1999National Household Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings 1997. Rockville MD: Substance Abuse And Mental Health Services Administration.
15.
SudmanS.BradburnN.1974Response effects in surveys: A review and synthesis. Chicago, IL.: Aldine.
16.
TurnerC.LesslerJ.DevoreJ.1992Effects of mode of administration and wording on reporting of drug use. In TurnerC.LesslerJ.GfroererJ. (Eds.), Survey measurement of drug use: Methodological studies. Washington, D.C.: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
17.
WarnerS.1965Randomized response: A survey technique for eliminating error answer bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, 63–69.
18.
WildmanR.1977Effects of anonymity and social setting on survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 41, 74–79.
19.
ZanesA.MatsoukasE.1979Different settings, different results? A comparison of school and home responses, Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 550–557.