A primary threat to the operative effectiveness of drug courts is high failure rates. Empirically supported screening devices could aid drug court administrators in maximizing resources, either through client selection or by helping to target problem clients in need of specialized assistance. Drawing from South Carolina county-level drug court records, success rates for participants with particular background characteristics were examined to identify correlations contributing to drug court success. Risk factors for drug court members were identified using chi-square and discriminant function analysis. Recidivism, crack as drug of choice, existence of criminality before drug use, and prior drug treatment were significantly related to drug court failure. These variables, as well as social stability variables, are argued to be vital elements in screening mechanisms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonD.ShumackerR.AndersonS.1991Releasee characteristics and parole success. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 17(1/2), 133–145.
2.
BelenkoS.1998Research on drug courts: A critical review. National Drug Court Institute Review, 1(1).
3.
BelenkoS.FaganJ.DumanovskyT.1993New York City's special drug courts: Recidivism patters and processing costs. New York, N.Y.: New York City Criminal Justice Agency.
4.
CopasJ.1986Prediction equations, statistical analysis, and shrinkage. In BlumsteinA. (Ed.), Criminal Careers and “Career Criminals” (pp. 232–255). Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
5.
DeschenesE.P.TurnerS.GreenwoodP.W.1996An experimental evaluation of drug testing and treatment interventions for probationers in Maricopa County, Arizona. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
6.
Drug Court Programs Office, U.S. Department of Justice1996Summary assessment of the drug court experience. Washington, D.C.: American University. Fetros, C.M.
7.
Drug Court Programs Office, U.S. Department of Justice1998The Los Angeles County drug courts: Correlates of success. Dissertation, California State University at Long Beach.
8.
General Accounting Office1997Drug courts: Overview of growth, characteristics, and results. Washington, D.C.
9.
GottfredsonS.GottfredsonD.1985Accuracy of prediction models. In FarringtonD.TarlingR. (Eds.), Prediction in Criminology (pp. 212–290). Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York.
10.
GranfieldR.EbyC.BrewsterT.1998An examination of the Denver Drug Court: The impact of a treatment-oriented drug-offender system. Law and Policy, 20(2), 183–202.
11.
Major City Chief Administrators1994Maintaining integrity in law enforcement organizations: Selected readings. Washington, D.C.: FBI Academy.
12.
MorganK.1995Variables associated with successful probation completion. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 22(3/4), 141–153.
13.
MorganK.1994Factors associated with probation outcome. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22(4), 341–53.
14.
PetersR.H.HaasA.L.MurrinM.R.1999Predictors of retention and arrest in drug courts. National Drug Court Institute Review, 2(1), 33–60.
15.
PetersR.H.MurrinM.R.2000Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27(1), 72–96.
16.
PetersR.H.MurrinM.R.De La ParteL.1998Evaluation of treatment-based drug courts in Florida's First Judicial Circuit. Tallahassee, FL: Florida Office of the State Courts Administrator.
17.
PetersR.H.PeytonE.1998Guidelines for drug courts on screening and assessment. Washington, D.C.: Drug Courts Program Office, U.S. Office of Justice Programs.
18.
PresserL.LowenkampC.T.1999Restorative justice and offender screening. Journal of Criminal Justice, 27(4), 333–43.
19.
ReeseE.N.1999Examining specialized drug courts: An evaluation of the Las Vegas Drug Court Treatment program (Nevada). Dissertation, UNLV.
20.
RiversJ.E.DemboR.AnwylR.S.1998The Hillsborough County, Florida Juvenile Assessment Center: A prototype. Prison Journal, 78(4), 439–450.
21.
SchumackerR.AndersonD.AndersonS.1990Vocational and academic indicators of parole success. Journal of Correctional Education, 41(1), 8–13.
22.
ShawM.RobinsonK.1998Summary and analysis of the first juvenile drug court evaluations. National Drug Court Institute Review, 1(1), 73–85.
23.
ShearerR.A.CarterC.R.1999Screening and assessing substance-abusing offenders: Quantity and quality. Federal Probation, 63(1), 30–34.
24.
SimsB.JonesM.1997Predicting success or failure on probation: Factors associated with felony probation outcomes. Crime & Delinquency, 43(3), 314–327.
25.
SmithW.AloisiM.1999Prediction of recidivism among ‘second timers’ in the juvenile justice system: Efficiency in screening chronic offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23(2), 201–222.
26.
SmithW.AloisiM.1999Prediction of recidivism among ‘second timers’ in the juvenile justice system: Efficiency in screening chronic offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23(2), 201–222.
27.
TorresS.DeschenesE.P.1997Changing the system and making it work: The process of implementing drug courts in Los Angeles County. Justice System Journal, 19(3), 267–290.
28.
VitoG.TewksburyR.A.1999The impact of treatment: The Jefferson County (Kentucky) drug court program. Federal Probation, 62(2), 46–51.
29.
WaltersG.D.1998The lifestyle criminality screening form: Psychometric properties and practical utility. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 27(3/4), 9–23.
30.
WaltersG.McDonoughJ.R.1998The Lifestyle Criminality Screening Form as a predictor of federal parole/probation/supervised release outcome: A 3-year followup. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3(2), 173–181.
31.
WebbT.1996Reconviction predictors for probationers. Probation Journal, 43, 8–12.
32.
WilbanksW.1985Predicting failure on parole. In FarringtonD.TarlingR. (Eds.), Prediction in Criminology. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York.
33.
WishE.JohnsonB.1985The impact of substance abuse on criminal careers. In BlumsteinA. (Ed.), Criminal Careers and “Career Criminals” (pp. 52–88). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
