Drug use and treatment frequently are investigated from an individual perspective. In this paper, we focus on the perceptions of drug treatment among women in 48 mother/adult daughter dyads. Two-thirds of the women were crack cocaine users and they all were part of a larger study on intergenerational drug use. The women were recruited using targeted sampling, followed by theoretical sampling. In the tradition of feminist research, data collection primarily involved open-ended interviews, following a life course perspective. Data analyses involved the constant comparison method of the grounded theory process. A popular assumption is that women enter drug treatment because they are ordered by the court to do so. Overall, the mothers emphasized internal factors as most salient. Another theme in the women's stories was the perceived barriers to entering drug treatment. A better understanding of the internal and external factors regarding drug treatment decisions will assist us in clarifying treatment readiness. The women also made suggestions for more holistic and women-focused drug treatment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BelenkoS.FaganJ.ChinK.1991Criminal justice response to crack. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28(1), 55–74.
2.
BiemackiP.1986Pathways from heroin: Addiction without treatment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
3.
BoothR.KiatkowskiC.IguchiM.PintoF.1998Facilitating treatment entry among out-of-treatment injection drug users. Public Health Reports, 113(S1), 116–128.
4.
BourgoisP.1989In search of Horatio Alger: Culture and ideology in the crack economy. Contemporary Drug Problems, 16(4), 619–649.
5.
CampbellJ.BuntingS.1991Voices and paradigms: Perspectives on critical and feminist theory in nursing. Advancement in Nursing Science, 13(3), 1–5.
6.
CarrollK.RounsavilleB.KellerD.1991Relapse prevention strategies for the treatment of cocaine abuse. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 17(3), 249–265.
7.
CoyleS.1998Women's drug use and HIV risk: Findings from NIDA's cooperative agreement for community-based outreach/intervention research program. Women & Health, 27(1–2), 1–18.
8.
DeLeonG.MelnickG.HawkeJ.2000The motivation-readiness factor in drug treatment: Implications for research and policy. Advances in Medical Sociology, 7, 103–129.
9.
EttoreB.1992Women and substance abuse. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University Press.
10.
FlorentineR.NakashimaJ.AnglinD.1999Client engagement in drug treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 17(3), 199–206.
11.
GlaserB.StraussA.1967The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
12.
GoldsteinP.1979Prostitution and drugs. Lexington (MA): Lexington Books.
13.
HenwoodK.1997Adult mother-daughter relationships: Two phases in the analysis of a qualitative project. Feminism and Psychology, 7(2), 255–263.
14.
HserY.MaglioneM.PolinskyM.AnglinD.1998Predicting drug treatment entry among treatment seeking individuals. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 15(3), 213–220.
15.
HubbardR.MarsdenM.RachalJ.HarwoodH.CavanaighE.GinzbergH.1989Drug abuse treatment: A national study of effectiveness. Chapel Hill (NC): University of North Carolina Press.
16.
InciardiJ.LockwoodD.PottiegerA., 1993Women and crack cocaine. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
17.
KearneyM.MurphyS.RosenbaumM.1994Mothering on crack cocaine: A grounded theory analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 2, 351–61.
18.
LeibJ.Sterk-ElifsonC.1995Crack in the cradle: Reproductive decision making among crack cocaine users. Journal of Contemporary Drug Problems, 12(4), 687–706.
19.
MoenP.EricksonM.Dempster-McCainD.1997Their mother's daughters? The intergenerational transmission of gender attitudes in a world of changing roles. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59(2), 281–293.
20.
MurphyS.RosenbaumM.1999Pregnant women on drugs: Combating stereotypes and stigma. New Brunswick (NJ): Rutgers University Press.
21.
NeedleR.FisherD.WeatherbyN.ChitwoodD.BrownB.CesariH.BoothR.WilliamsM.WattersJ.AndersenM.BraunsteinM.1995Reliability of self-reported HIV risk behaviors of drug users. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 9(4), 242–250.
22.
Nelson-ZlupkoL.MorrisonM.KauffmanE.KaltenbachK.1996Women in recovery: Their perceptions of treatment effectiveness. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 13, 51–59.
23.
PapeP.1993Issues in the assessment and intervention with alcohol and drug abusing women. In StraussnerS. (Ed.), Clinical work with substance abusing clients. New York: Guilford Press.
24.
RatnerM.1993Crack pipe as a pimp: An ethnographic investigation of sex-for-crack exchanges. New York: Lexington Books.
25.
ReedB.1987Developing women-sensitive drug dependence treatment services: Why so difficult?International Journal of the Addictions, 20(1), 13–62.
26.
RosenbaumM.1981Women on heroin. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
27.
SimpsonD.SellsS.1982Effectiveness of treatment for drug abuse: An overview of the DARP research program. Advances in Alcohol and Substance Abuse, 2(1), 7–29.
28.
SkollG.1992Walk the walk and talk the talk: An ethnography of a drug abuse treatment facility. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
29.
SterkC.1999Fast lives: Women who use crack cocaine. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
30.
SterkC.2000Tricking and tripping: Prostitution in the era of AIDS. Putnam Valley (NY): Social Change Press.
31.
Sterk-ElifsonC.1993Outreach among drug users: Ethnography and health education. Human Organization, 52(2), 162–68.
32.
Sterk-ElifsonC.1995Women and drug use: The application of qualitative research methods. In LambertE.AsheryR. (Eds.), Qualitative methods in drug abuse and HIV research, NIDA Monograph, 65–83. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.
33.
SterkC.DolanK.HatchS.1999Epidemiological indicators and ethnographic realities of female cocaine use. Journal of Substance Abuse and Use, 34(14), 2055–2070.
34.
StraussA.1987Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
35.
StraussA.CorbinJ.1998Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
36.
StevensS.PattonT.1998Residential treatment for drug addicted women and their children: Effective treatment strategies. Drugs and Society, 13(1–2), 235–249.
37.
United States Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute on Drug Abuse2000Treatment Episode Data Set. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office.
38.
WaldorfD.ReinarmanC.MurphyS.1991Cocaine changes: The experience of using and quitting. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
39.
WallenJ.1992A comparison of male and female clients in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9, 243–248.
40.
WaterstonA.1991Street addicts in the political economy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
41.
WattersJ.BiernackiP.1989Targeted sampling: Options for the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 36, 416–30.
42.
WeatherbyN.NeedleR.CesariH.BoothR.1994Validity of self-reported drug use among injection drug users and crack cocaine users recruited through street outreach. Evaluation & Program Planning, 17(4), 347–355.
43.
WechsbergW.CraddockS.HubbardR.1998How are women who enter substance abuse treatment different than men? A gender comparison from the drug abuse treatment outcome study (DATOS). Drugs and Society, 13(1–2), 97–115.
44.
WeeksM.SingerM.HimmelgreenD.RichmondP.GrierM.RaddaK.1998Drug use patterns of substance abusing women: Gender and ethnic differences in an AIDS prevention program. Drugs and Society, 13(1–2), 35–61.
